EPYC 9255 vs EPYC 7C13
EPYC 9255
EPYC 7C13
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar EPYC 9255
Performance Per Dollar EPYC 7C13
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | EPYC 9255 | EPYC 7C13 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($1,934) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($2,000) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Turin (2024) / 4 nm) | ✨ Modern (Milan (2021−2023) / 7 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | EPYC 9255 | EPYC 7C13 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+3%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($1,934) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($2,000) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 9255 and EPYC 7C13
EPYC 9255
The EPYC 9255 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 3.25 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 200 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 75,809 points. Launch price was $2,495.
EPYC 7C13
The EPYC 7C13 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2021-03-01. It is based on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.68 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 225 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 76,363 points. Launch price was $5,000.
Processing Power
The EPYC 9255 packs 24 cores / 48 threads, while the EPYC 7C13 offers 64 cores / 128 threads — the EPYC 7C13 has 40 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the EPYC 9255 versus 3.68 GHz on the EPYC 7C13 — a 26.4% clock advantage for the EPYC 9255 (base: 3.25 GHz vs 2 GHz). The EPYC 9255 uses the Turin (2024) architecture (4 nm), while the EPYC 7C13 uses Milan (2021−2023) (7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9255 scores 75,809 against the EPYC 7C13's 76,363 — a 0.7% lead for the EPYC 7C13. L3 cache: 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 9255 vs 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 7C13.
| Feature | EPYC 9255 | EPYC 7C13 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 24 / 48 | 64 / 128+167% |
| Boost Clock | 4.8 GHz+30% | 3.68 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.25 GHz+63% | 2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 128 MB (total) | 256 MB (total)+100% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core)+100% | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | 4 nm-43% | 7 nm |
| Architecture | Turin (2024) | Milan (2021−2023) |
| PassMark | 75,809 | 76,363 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,538 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 37,000 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 9255 uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the EPYC 7C13 uses SP3 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 4800 on the EPYC 9255 versus DDR4-3200 on the EPYC 7C13 — the EPYC 9255 supports 199.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 9255 supports up to 6144 of RAM compared to 4096 GB — 40% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9255) vs 8 (EPYC 7C13). Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9255) and SP3 (EPYC 7C13).
| Feature | EPYC 9255 | EPYC 7C13 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP5 | SP3 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 4800+119900% | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 6144 | 4096 GB+69904967% |
| RAM Channels | 12+50% | 8 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 128 | 128 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the EPYC 9255 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9255) vs AMD-V (EPYC 7C13). Primary use case: EPYC 7C13 targets Enterprise Server. Direct competitor: EPYC 9255 rivals Xeon Platinum 8480+; EPYC 7C13 rivals Xeon Platinum 8380.
| Feature | EPYC 9255 | EPYC 7C13 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, SEV-SNP | AMD-V |
| Target Use | — | Enterprise Server |
Value Analysis
The EPYC 9255 launched at $2495 MSRP, while the EPYC 7C13 debuted at $2000. At current prices ($1934 vs $2000), the EPYC 9255 is $66 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9255 delivers 39.2 pts/$ vs 38.2 pts/$ for the EPYC 7C13 — making the EPYC 9255 the 2.6% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 9255 | EPYC 7C13 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2495 | $2000-20% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $1934-3% | $2000 |
| Performance per Dollar | 39.2+3% | 38.2 |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2021 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on EPYC 9255 and EPYC 7C13
