EPYC 9275F vs EPYC 7763
EPYC 9275F
EPYC 7763
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar EPYC 9275F
Performance Per Dollar EPYC 7763
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | EPYC 9275F | EPYC 7763 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($3,439) | ✅ More affordable ($1,513) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Turin (2024) / 4 nm) | ✨ Modern (Milan (2021−2023) / 7 nm+) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | EPYC 9275F | EPYC 7763 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+127%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($3,439) | ✅ More affordable ($1,513) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 9275F and EPYC 7763
EPYC 9275F
The EPYC 9275F is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 4.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 320 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 84,620 points. Launch price was $3,439.
EPYC 7763
The EPYC 7763 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 15 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 2.45 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm+ process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 84,440 points. Launch price was $7,890.
Processing Power
The EPYC 9275F packs 24 cores / 48 threads, while the EPYC 7763 offers 64 cores / 128 threads — the EPYC 7763 has 40 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the EPYC 9275F versus 3.5 GHz on the EPYC 7763 — a 31.3% clock advantage for the EPYC 9275F (base: 4.1 GHz vs 2.45 GHz). The EPYC 9275F uses the Turin (2024) architecture (4 nm), while the EPYC 7763 uses Milan (2021−2023) (7 nm+). In PassMark, the EPYC 9275F scores 84,620 against the EPYC 7763's 84,440 — a 0.2% lead for the EPYC 9275F. Both processors carry 256 MB (total) of L3 cache.
| Feature | EPYC 9275F | EPYC 7763 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 24 / 48 | 64 / 128+167% |
| Boost Clock | 4.8 GHz+37% | 3.5 GHz |
| Base Clock | 4.1 GHz+67% | 2.45 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 256 MB (total) | 256 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core)+100% | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | 4 nm-43% | 7 nm+ |
| Architecture | Turin (2024) | Milan (2021−2023) |
| PassMark | 84,620 | 84,440 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 9275F uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the EPYC 7763 uses SP3 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 6000 on the EPYC 9275F versus 3200 on the EPYC 7763 — the EPYC 9275F supports 60.9% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 9275F supports up to 6144 of RAM compared to 4096 — 40% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9275F) vs 8 (EPYC 7763). Both provide 128 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9275F) and SP3 (EPYC 7763).
| Feature | EPYC 9275F | EPYC 7763 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP5 | SP3 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 6000+88% | 3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 6144+50% | 4096 |
| RAM Channels | 12+50% | 8 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 128 | 128 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the EPYC 9275F supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9275F) vs VT-x, VT-d, SEV (EPYC 7763). Direct competitor: EPYC 9275F rivals Xeon 6980P; EPYC 7763 rivals Xeon Platinum 8380.
| Feature | EPYC 9275F | EPYC 7763 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, SEV-SNP | VT-x, VT-d, SEV |
Value Analysis
The EPYC 9275F launched at $3439 MSRP, while the EPYC 7763 debuted at $7890. At current prices ($3439 vs $1513), the EPYC 7763 is $1926 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9275F delivers 24.6 pts/$ vs 55.8 pts/$ for the EPYC 7763 — making the EPYC 7763 the 77.6% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 9275F | EPYC 7763 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $3439-56% | $7890 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $3439 | $1513-56% |
| Performance per Dollar | 24.6 | 55.8+127% |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2021 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on EPYC 9275F and EPYC 7763
