EPYC 9275F
Xeon Max 9480
EPYC 9275F vs Xeon Max 9480 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
EPYC 9275F vs Xeon Max 9480 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
EPYC 9275F vs Xeon Max 9480: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
EPYC 9275F
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +24.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+127.6% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 113 MB).
- ✅Costs $9,541 less on MSRP ($3,439 MSRP vs $12,980 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 285.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 24.6 vs 6.4 PassMark/$ ($3,439 MSRP vs $12,980 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 320W instead of 350W, a 30W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Xeon Max 9480
2023Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 9275F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (82,913 vs 84,620).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (113 MB vs 256 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 6.4 vs 24.6 PassMark/$ ($12,980 MSRP vs $3,439 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is EPYC 9275F better than Xeon Max 9480?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 9275F vs Xeon Max 9480 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
EPYC 9275F
The EPYC 9275F is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 4.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 320 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 84,620 points. Launch price was $3,439.
Xeon Max 9480
The Xeon Max 9480 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 10 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids HBM (2023) architecture. It features 56 cores and 112 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 112.5 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 82,913 points. Launch price was $12,980.
Processing Power
The EPYC 9275F packs 24 cores / 48 threads, while the Xeon Max 9480 offers 56 cores / 112 threads — the Xeon Max 9480 has 32 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the EPYC 9275F versus 3.5 GHz on the Xeon Max 9480 — a 31.3% clock advantage for the EPYC 9275F (base: 4.1 GHz vs 1.9 GHz). The EPYC 9275F uses the Turin (2024) architecture (4 nm), while the Xeon Max 9480 uses Sapphire Rapids HBM (2023) (10 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9275F scores 84,620 against the Xeon Max 9480's 82,913 — a 2% lead for the EPYC 9275F. L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 9275F vs 112.5 MB on the Xeon Max 9480.
| Feature | EPYC 9275F | Xeon Max 9480 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 24 / 48 | 56 / 112+133% |
| Boost Clock | 4.8 GHz+37% | 3.5 GHz |
| Base Clock | 4.1 GHz+116% | 1.9 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 256 MB (total)+128% | 112.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 4 nm-60% | 10 nm |
| Architecture | Turin (2024) | Sapphire Rapids HBM (2023) |
| PassMark | 84,620+2% | 82,913 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,900 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 55,000 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 9275F uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon Max 9480 uses LGA4677 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 6000 on the EPYC 9275F versus DDR5-4800 on the Xeon Max 9480 — the EPYC 9275F supports 25% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 9275F supports up to 6144 GB of RAM compared to 4096 GB — 50% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9275F) vs 8 (Xeon Max 9480). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 9275F) vs 80 (Xeon Max 9480) — the EPYC 9275F offers 48 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9275F) and C741 (Xeon Max 9480).
| Feature | EPYC 9275F | Xeon Max 9480 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP5 | LGA4677 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 6000+25% | DDR5-4800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 6144 GB+50% | 4096 GB |
| RAM Channels | 12+50% | 8 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+60% | 80 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, SEV-SNP (EPYC 9275F) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Max 9480). Primary use case: Xeon Max 9480 targets HPC Server. Direct competitor: EPYC 9275F rivals Xeon 6980P; Xeon Max 9480 rivals EPYC 9684X.
| Feature | EPYC 9275F | Xeon Max 9480 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, SEV-SNP | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | — | HPC Server |
Value Analysis
At launch, the EPYC 9275F was priced at $3439, while the Xeon Max 9480 came in at $12980. On launch pricing ($3439 vs $12980), EPYC 9275F was $9541 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9275F delivers 24.6 pts/$ vs 6.4 pts/$ for the Xeon Max 9480 — making the EPYC 9275F the 117.6% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 9275F | Xeon Max 9480 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $3439-74% | $12980 |
| Performance per Dollar | 24.6+284% | 6.4 |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2023 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on EPYC 9275F and Xeon Max 9480
