FirePro 3D V3750
VS
GeForce GTX 1650

FirePro 3D V3750 vs GeForce GTX 1650

FirePro 3D V3750

2014Core: 850 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650

2019Core: 1485 MHzBoost: 1665 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The FirePro 3D V3750 is positioned at rank #307 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar FirePro 3D V3750

#116
Radeon Pro SSG
MSRP: $6999|Avg: $1500
92%
#292
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
8639%
#307
FirePro 3D V3750
MSRP: $199|Avg: $25
100%
#309
NVS 810
MSRP: $700|Avg: $80
99%
#310
GRID P40-2Q
MSRP: $5699|Avg: $340
98%
#311
Quadro 2000D
MSRP: $599|Avg: $40
96%
#312
FirePro 3D V8800
MSRP: $1499|Avg: $30
95%
#313
Quadro K5000
MSRP: $2499|Avg: $60
94%
#314
Quadro 2000
MSRP: $599|Avg: $25
92%
#315
FirePro S7150
MSRP: $2399|Avg: $459
92%
#317
FirePro W9000
MSRP: $3999|Avg: $150
90%
#318
GRID M60-4Q
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $120
89%
#319
FirePro V8800
MSRP: $1499|Avg: $100
89%
#320
Quadro K6000
MSRP: $5265|Avg: $300
89%
#321
NVS 510
MSRP: $449|Avg: $15
88%
#322
GRID M60-1Q
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $50
87%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The GeForce GTX 1650 uses modern memory architecture. The GeForce GTX 1650 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The FirePro 3D V3750 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 1650 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2207.6% higher G3D Mark score and 1500% more VRAM (4 GB vs 256 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the FirePro 3D V3750.

InsightFirePro 3D V3750GeForce GTX 1650
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-2207.6%)
Leading raw performance (+2207.6%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+1500%)
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 1650 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $75 (vs $25), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 669.2% better value per dollar than the FirePro 3D V3750.

InsightFirePro 3D V3750GeForce GTX 1650
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+669.2%)
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($25)
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($75)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of FirePro 3D V3750 and GeForce GTX 1650

AMD

FirePro 3D V3750

The FirePro 3D V3750 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 18 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 274W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 341 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the FirePro 3D V3750 scores 341 versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 7,869 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 2207.6%. The FirePro 3D V3750 is built on GCN 1.0 while the GeForce GTX 1650 uses Turing, both on 28 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (FirePro 3D V3750) vs 896 (GeForce GTX 1650). Raw compute: 3.482 TFLOPS (FirePro 3D V3750) vs 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650).

FeatureFirePro 3D V3750GeForce GTX 1650
G3D Mark Score
341
7,869+2208%
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Turing
Process Node
28 nm
12 nm
Shading Units
2048+129%
896
Compute (TFLOPS)
3.482 TFLOPS+17%
2.984 TFLOPS
ROPs
32
32
TMUs
128+129%
56
L1 Cache
512 KB
896 KB+75%
L2 Cache
0.75 MB
1 MB+33%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureFirePro 3D V3750GeForce GTX 1650
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro 3D V3750 comes with 256 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1650 has 4 GB. The GeForce GTX 1650 offers 1500% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.75 MB (FirePro 3D V3750) vs 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) — the GeForce GTX 1650 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureFirePro 3D V3750GeForce GTX 1650
VRAM Capacity
0.25 GB
4 GB+1500%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
0.75 MB
1 MB+33%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 10.1 (FirePro 3D V3750) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 1650). Vulkan: None vs 1.4. OpenGL: 3.3 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 3.

FeatureFirePro 3D V3750GeForce GTX 1650
DirectX
10.1
12+19%
Vulkan
None
1.4
OpenGL
3.3
4.6+39%
Max Displays
2
3+50%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: UVD 2.2 (FirePro 3D V3750) vs NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650). Decoder: UVD 2.2 vs NVDEC 4th gen. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (FirePro 3D V3750) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650).

FeatureFirePro 3D V3750GeForce GTX 1650
Encoder
UVD 2.2
NVENC 5th gen (Volta)
Decoder
UVD 2.2
NVDEC 4th gen
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1
H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro 3D V3750 draws 274W versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 75W — a 114% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro 3D V3750) vs 300W (GeForce GTX 1650). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Card length: 168mm vs 229mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 70°C.

FeatureFirePro 3D V3750GeForce GTX 1650
TDP
274W
75W-73%
Recommended PSU
350W
300W-14%
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
None
Length
168mm
229mm
Height
111mm
111mm
Slots
1-50%
2
Temp (Load)
70°C
70°C
Perf/Watt
1.2
104.9+8642%
💰

Value Analysis

The FirePro 3D V3750 launched at $199 MSRP and currently averages $25, while the GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 and now averages $75. The FirePro 3D V3750 costs 66.7% less ($50 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 13.6 (FirePro 3D V3750) vs 104.9 (GeForce GTX 1650) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 671.3% better value. The GeForce GTX 1650 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2014).

FeatureFirePro 3D V3750GeForce GTX 1650
MSRP
$199
$149-25%
Avg Price (30d)
$25-67%
$75
Performance per Dollar
13.6
104.9+671%
Codename
Tahiti
TU117
Release
January 18 2014
April 23 2019
Ranking
#423
#323