FirePro 3D V3750 vs GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
FirePro 3D V3750
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The FirePro 3D V3750 is positioned at rank #307 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar FirePro 3D V3750
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is significantly newer (2020 vs 2014). The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The FirePro 3D V3750 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 5856.6% higher G3D Mark score and 3100% more VRAM (8 GB vs 256 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the FirePro 3D V3750.
| Insight | FirePro 3D V3750 | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-5856.6%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+5856.6%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | 🔮Strong Longevity (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $280 (vs $25), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 431.8% better value per dollar than the FirePro 3D V3750.
| Insight | FirePro 3D V3750 | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+431.8%) |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($25) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($280) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of FirePro 3D V3750 and GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
FirePro 3D V3750
The FirePro 3D V3750 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 18 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 274W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 341 points.
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1410 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 4864 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 38 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,312 points. Launch price was $399.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the FirePro 3D V3750 scores 341 versus the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti's 20,312 — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti leads by 5856.6%. The FirePro 3D V3750 is built on GCN 1.0 while the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti uses Ampere, both on 28 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (FirePro 3D V3750) vs 4,864 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti). Raw compute: 3.482 TFLOPS (FirePro 3D V3750) vs 16.2 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti).
| Feature | FirePro 3D V3750 | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 341 | 20,312+5857% |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Ampere |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048 | 4864+138% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.482 TFLOPS | 16.2 TFLOPS+365% |
| ROPs | 32 | 80+150% |
| TMUs | 128 | 152+19% |
| L1 Cache | 0.5 MB | 4.8 MB+860% |
| L2 Cache | 0.75 MB | 4 MB+433% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro 3D V3750 | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | DLSS 2.0 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro 3D V3750 comes with 256 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 3100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 0.75 MB (FirePro 3D V3750) vs 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FirePro 3D V3750 | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.25 GB | 8 GB+3100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 256-bit+300% |
| L2 Cache | 0.75 MB | 4 MB+433% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.1 (FirePro 3D V3750) vs 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti). Vulkan: None vs 1.3. OpenGL: 3.3 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 4.
| Feature | FirePro 3D V3750 | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.1 | 12 Ultimate (12_2)+19% |
| Vulkan | None | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6+39% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 4+100% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: UVD 2.2 (FirePro 3D V3750) vs NVENC (Ampere) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti). Decoder: UVD 2.2 vs NVDEC (Ampere). Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (FirePro 3D V3750) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti).
| Feature | FirePro 3D V3750 | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | UVD 2.2 | NVENC (Ampere) |
| Decoder | UVD 2.2 | NVDEC (Ampere) |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro 3D V3750 draws 274W versus the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti's 200W — a 31.2% difference. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro 3D V3750) vs 600W (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 168mm vs 242mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 75.
| Feature | FirePro 3D V3750 | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 274W | 200W-27% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-42% | 600W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | 168mm | 242mm |
| Height | 111mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-7% | 75 |
| Perf/Watt | 1.2 | 101.6+8367% |
Value Analysis
The FirePro 3D V3750 launched at $199 MSRP and currently averages $25, while the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti launched at $399 and now averages $280. The FirePro 3D V3750 costs 91.1% less ($255 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 13.6 (FirePro 3D V3750) vs 72.5 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 433.1% better value. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2014).
| Feature | FirePro 3D V3750 | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $199-50% | $399 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $25-91% | $280 |
| Performance per Dollar | 13.6 | 72.5+433% |
| Codename | Tahiti | GA104 |
| Release | January 18 2014 | December 1 2020 |
| Ranking | #423 | #73 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on FirePro 3D V3750 and GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
