FirePro 3D V3750 vs Radeon R5 310

FirePro 3D V3750

2014Core: 850 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon R5 310

2017Core: 730 MHzBoost: 1024 MHz
Similar parts
·······

FirePro 3D V3750 vs Radeon R5 310 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FirePro 3D V3750 vs Radeon R5 310: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FirePro 3D V3750

2014

Why buy it

  • Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2014 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 306.1% HIGHER MSRP
    $199 MSRPvs$49 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.7 vs 6.8 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $49 MSRP).
  • 448% higher power demand at 274W vs 50W.

Radeon R5 310

2017

Why buy it

  • Costs $150 less on MSRP ($49 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
  • Delivers 295.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 6.8 vs 1.7 G3D/$ ($49 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 256 MB).
  • Draws 50W instead of 274W, a 224W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • 2017 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
FirePro 3D V3750 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 2.7% in PassMark G3D (341 vs 332), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
FirePro 3D V3750 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon R5 310 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $150 cheaper on MSRP at $49 vs $199, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 295.4% (6.8 vs 1.7), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R5 310 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, FirePro 3D V3750 has the stronger long-term case.

FirePro 3D V3750 vs Radeon R5 310 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

FirePro 3D V3750

The FirePro 3D V3750 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 18 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 274W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 341 points.

AMD

Radeon R5 310

The Radeon R5 310 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 18 2017. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 730 MHz to 1024 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 332 points.

Graphics Performance

The FirePro 3D V3750 scores 341 and the Radeon R5 310 reaches 332 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro 3D V3750 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon R5 310 uses GCN 3.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,048 (FirePro 3D V3750) vs 384 (Radeon R5 310). Raw compute: 3.482 TFLOPS (FirePro 3D V3750) vs 0.7864 TFLOPS (Radeon R5 310).

FeatureFirePro 3D V3750Radeon R5 310
G3D Mark Score
341+3%
332
Architecture
GCN 1.0
GCN 3.0
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
2048+433%
384
Compute (TFLOPS)
3.482 TFLOPS+343%
0.7864 TFLOPS
ROPs
32+300%
8
TMUs
128+433%
24
L1 Cache
512 KB+433%
96 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB+500%
128 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureFirePro 3D V3750Radeon R5 310
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro 3D V3750 has 256 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon R5 310 carries 512 MB. Radeon R5 310 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro 3D V3750 and 128-bit on the Radeon R5 310. L2 Cache: 768 KB (FirePro 3D V3750) vs 128 KB (Radeon R5 310) — the FirePro 3D V3750 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureFirePro 3D V3750Radeon R5 310
VRAM Capacity
0.25 GB
0.5 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
768 KB+500%
128 KB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro 3D V3750 draws 274W versus the Radeon R5 310's 50W — a 138.3% difference. The Radeon R5 310 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro 3D V3750) vs 350W (Radeon R5 310). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureFirePro 3D V3750Radeon R5 310
TDP
274W
50W-82%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
168mm
Height
111mm
Slots
1
Temp (Load)
70°C
Perf/Watt
1.2
6.6+450%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the FirePro 3D V3750 came in at $199, while the Radeon R5 310 launched at $49. On MSRP, Radeon R5 310 was 75.4% cheaper ($150 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.7 (FirePro 3D V3750) vs 6.8 (Radeon R5 310) — the Radeon R5 310 offers 300% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R5 310 (2017 vs 2014).

FeatureFirePro 3D V3750Radeon R5 310
MSRP
$199
$49-75%
Performance per Dollar
1.7
6.8+300%
Codename
Tahiti
Weston
Release
January 18 2014
April 18 2017
Ranking
#423
#873

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.