FirePro 3D V4800 vs Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U
FirePro 3D V4800
Popular choices:
Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The FirePro 3D V4800 is positioned at rank #227 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar FirePro 3D V4800
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U is significantly newer (2017 vs 2010). The Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The FirePro 3D V4800 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The FirePro 3D V4800 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.6% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (1 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U.
| Insight | FirePro 3D V4800 | Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.6%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.6%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Vega (2017−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the FirePro 3D V4800 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of FirePro 3D V4800 and Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U
FirePro 3D V4800
The FirePro 3D V4800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 26 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 690 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 74W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 854 points. Launch price was $479.
Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U
The Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 26 2017. It features the Vega architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1200 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 832 points.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro 3D V4800 scores 854 and the Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U reaches 832 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro 3D V4800 is built on TeraScale 2 while the Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U uses Vega, both on 40 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 800 (FirePro 3D V4800) vs 512 (Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U). Raw compute: 1.104 TFLOPS (FirePro 3D V4800) vs 1.843 TFLOPS (Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U).
| Feature | FirePro 3D V4800 | Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 854+3% | 832 |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Vega |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 800+56% | 512 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.104 TFLOPS | 1.843 TFLOPS+67% |
| ROPs | 16+100% | 8 |
| TMUs | 40+25% | 32 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro 3D V4800 | Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro 3D V4800 comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U has 0 MB. The FirePro 3D V4800 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs System.
| Feature | FirePro 3D V4800 | Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | System |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.2 (FirePro 3D V4800) vs 12 (12_1) (Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U). Vulkan: None vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.4 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 3.
| Feature | FirePro 3D V4800 | Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.2 | 12 (12_1)+7% |
| Vulkan | None | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6+5% |
| Max Displays | 3 | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: UVD 2.3 (FirePro 3D V4800) vs VCE 4.0 (Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U). Decoder: UVD 2.3 vs UVD 7.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (FirePro 3D V4800) vs H.264,H.265 (Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U).
| Feature | FirePro 3D V4800 | Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | UVD 2.3 | VCE 4.0 |
| Decoder | UVD 2.3 | UVD 7.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 | H.264,H.265 |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro 3D V4800 draws 74W versus the Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U's 15W — a 132.6% difference. The Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro 3D V4800) vs 1W (Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated. Card length: 168mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75.
| Feature | FirePro 3D V4800 | Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 74W | 15W-80% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Integrated |
| Length | 168mm | 0mm |
| Height | 69mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 75 |
| Perf/Watt | 11.5 | 55.5+383% |
Value Analysis
The FirePro 3D V4800 launched at $189 MSRP and currently averages $20, while the Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U launched at $0 and now averages $0. The Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U costs 100+% less ($20 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 42.7 (FirePro 3D V4800) vs Infinity (Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U) — the Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U offers Infinity% better value. The Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2010).
| Feature | FirePro 3D V4800 | Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $189 | $0-100% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $20 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 42.7 | Infinity |
| Codename | Juniper | Vega Raven Ridge |
| Release | April 26 2010 | October 26 2017 |
| Ranking | #780 | #721 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on FirePro 3D V4800 and Radeon Vega 3 Ryzen 3 3200U
