FirePro D300
VS
GeForce GTX 1060

FirePro D300 vs GeForce GTX 1060

FirePro D300

2014Core: 850 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1060

2016Core: 1607 MHzBoost: 1733 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The FirePro D300 is positioned at rank #130 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar FirePro D300

#66
Radeon PRO W7800
MSRP: $2499|Avg: $2200
95%
#67
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
MSRP: $1999|Avg: $1450
90%
#115
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
1291%
#130
FirePro D300
MSRP: $500|Avg: $20
100%
#131
Radeon Pro WX 3200
MSRP: $199|Avg: $199
97%
#132
Radeon Pro WX 5100
MSRP: $499|Avg: $120
96%
#134
Quadro P2000 (móvel)
MSRP: $500|Avg: $150
94%
#135
Quadro P3000 (móvel)
MSRP: $600|Avg: $200
93%
#136
Quadro P3000
MSRP: $600|Avg: $80
93%
#139
Quadro T1000 (móvel)
MSRP: $500|Avg: $120
87%
#140
Radeon Pro V520
MSRP: $800|Avg: $300
87%
#141
Quadro M5500
MSRP: $800|Avg: $200
86%
#142
Quadro K1200
MSRP: $300|Avg: $184
86%
#143
Quadro P400
MSRP: $169|Avg: $60
86%
#144
Radeon Pro WX 7100
MSRP: $799|Avg: $180
84%
#145
Quadro M520
MSRP: $200|Avg: $50
84%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 1060 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 75.9% higher G3D Mark score and 50% more VRAM (6 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the FirePro D300.

InsightFirePro D300GeForce GTX 1060
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-75.9%)
Leading raw performance (+75.9%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Pascal (2016−2021))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+50%)
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The FirePro D300 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the FirePro D300 holds the technical lead. Priced at $20 (vs $60), it costs 67% less, resulting in a 70.6% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightFirePro D300GeForce GTX 1060
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+70.6%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($20)
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($60)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of FirePro D300 and GeForce GTX 1060

AMD

FirePro D300

The FirePro D300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 18 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,722 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1060

The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the FirePro D300 scores 5,722 versus the GeForce GTX 1060's 10,064 — the GeForce GTX 1060 leads by 75.9%. The FirePro D300 is built on GCN 1.0 while the GeForce GTX 1060 uses Pascal, both on 28 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (FirePro D300) vs 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060). Raw compute: 2.176 TFLOPS (FirePro D300) vs 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060).

FeatureFirePro D300GeForce GTX 1060
G3D Mark Score
5,722
10,064+76%
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Pascal
Process Node
28 nm
16 nm
Shading Units
1280
2560+100%
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.176 TFLOPS
8.873 TFLOPS+308%
ROPs
32
64+100%
TMUs
80
160+100%
L1 Cache
320 KB
960 KB+200%
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
2 MB+300%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureFirePro D300GeForce GTX 1060
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro D300 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1060 has 6 GB. The GeForce GTX 1060 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (FirePro D300) vs 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1060) — the GeForce GTX 1060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureFirePro D300GeForce GTX 1060
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
6 GB+50%
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit
192-bit+50%
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
2 MB+300%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (FirePro D300) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 1060). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 4.

FeatureFirePro D300GeForce GTX 1060
DirectX
12
12
Vulkan
1.2
1.3+8%
OpenGL
4.6+2%
4.5
Max Displays
6+50%
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (FirePro D300) vs NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060). Decoder: UVD 4.0 vs NVDEC (Pascal). Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-4,MPEG-2,VC-1 (FirePro D300) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060).

FeatureFirePro D300GeForce GTX 1060
Encoder
VCE 1.0
NVENC (Pascal)
Decoder
UVD 4.0
NVDEC (Pascal)
Codecs
H.264,MPEG-4,MPEG-2,VC-1
H.264,H.265/HEVC
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro D300 draws 150W versus the GeForce GTX 1060's 180W — a 18.2% difference. The FirePro D300 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro D300) vs 400W (GeForce GTX 1060). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 6-pin. Card length: 242mm vs 173mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots.

FeatureFirePro D300GeForce GTX 1060
TDP
150W-17%
180W
Recommended PSU
350W-13%
400W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
6-pin
Length
242mm
173mm
Height
111mm
111mm
Slots
1-50%
2
Temp (Load)
80°C
Perf/Watt
38.1
55.9+47%
💰

Value Analysis

The FirePro D300 launched at $500 MSRP and currently averages $20, while the GeForce GTX 1060 launched at $249 and now averages $60. The FirePro D300 costs 66.7% less ($40 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 286.1 (FirePro D300) vs 167.7 (GeForce GTX 1060) — the FirePro D300 offers 70.6% better value. The GeForce GTX 1060 is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2014).

FeatureFirePro D300GeForce GTX 1060
MSRP
$500
$249-50%
Avg Price (30d)
$20-67%
$60
Performance per Dollar
286.1+71%
167.7
Codename
Pitcairn
GP104
Release
January 18 2014
May 27 2016
Ranking
#506
#137