Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

FirePro D300 vs GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

CPUCPUGPUGPU

FirePro D300

2014Core: 850 MHz
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

2020Core: 1410 MHzBoost: 1665 MHz
RTX family
·······
Buy on Amazon

FirePro D300 vs GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Performance Spectrum

FirePro D300
4 GB 150
5,722
0.0%
brand logoRadeon R7 260X
brand logoRadeon 840M
brand logoRadeon R9 270
brand logoRadeon RX 5300M
brand logoRadeon RX 7600M
brand logoRadeon RX 6600M
brand logoRadeon RX 7650 GRE
brand logoRadeon RX 7700
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
8 GB 200
20,312
+255.0%
brand logoGeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile)
brand logoGeForce RTX 2080 Super with Max-Q Design
brand logoGeForce GTX 1080 (móvel)
brand logoGeForce GTX 1070 SLI
brand logoGeForce RTX 5060 Ti
brand logoGeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile
brand logoGeForce RTX 5090 Mobile
brand logoRTX 5000 Ada Generation

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FirePro D300 vs GeForce RTX 3060 Ti: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FirePro D300

2014

Why buy it

  • ✅Draws 150W instead of 200W, a 50W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (5,722 vs 20,312).
  • ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
  • ❌2014 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • ❌
    25.3% HIGHER MSRP
    $500 MSRPvs$399 MSRP

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

2020

Why buy it

  • ✅+255% higher PassMark G3D performance.
  • ✅Costs $101 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
  • ✅Delivers 344.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 11.4 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
  • ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
  • ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).

Trade-offs

  • ❌33.3% higher power demand at 200W vs 150W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 255% in PassMark G3D (20,312 vs 5,722), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 8 GB vs 4 GB of VRAM, the newer upscaling stack, DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 8nm process instead of 28nm, and 38 vs 0 ray-tracing units. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti makes the most sense to buy today. It is $101 cheaper on MSRP at $399 vs $500, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 344.8% (50.9 vs 11.4), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

FirePro D300 vs GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

FirePro D300

The FirePro D300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 18 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,722 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1410 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 4864 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 38 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,312 points. Launch price was $399.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the FirePro D300 scores 5,722 versus the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti's 20,312 — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti leads by 255%. The FirePro D300 is built on GCN 1.0 while the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti uses Ampere, both on 28 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (FirePro D300) vs 4,864 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti). Raw compute: 2.176 TFLOPS (FirePro D300) vs 16.2 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti).

FeatureFirePro D300GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
G3D Mark Score
5,722
20,312+255%
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Ampere
Process Node
28 nm
8 nm
Shading Units
1280
4864+280%
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.176 TFLOPS
16.2 TFLOPS+644%
ROPs
32
80+150%
TMUs
80
152+90%
L1 Cache
0.31 MB
4.8 MB+1448%
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
4 MB+700%
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The FirePro D300 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureFirePro D300GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
DLSS 2 Super Resolution
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro D300 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti carries 8 GB. GeForce RTX 3060 Ti gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the FirePro D300 and 256-bit on the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (FirePro D300) vs 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureFirePro D300GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
8 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Bus Width
128-bit
256-bit+100%
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
4 MB+700%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (FirePro D300) vs 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 4.

FeatureFirePro D300GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
DirectX
12
12 Ultimate (12_2)
Vulkan
1.2
1.3+8%
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
6+50%
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (FirePro D300) vs NVENC (Ampere) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti). Decoder: UVD 4.0 vs NVDEC (Ampere). Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-4,MPEG-2,VC-1 (FirePro D300) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti).

FeatureFirePro D300GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Encoder
VCE 1.0
NVENC (Ampere)
Decoder
UVD 4.0
NVDEC (Ampere)
Codecs
H.264,MPEG-4,MPEG-2,VC-1
H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro D300 draws 150W versus the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti's 200W — a 28.6% difference. The FirePro D300 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro D300) vs 600W (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 242mm vs 242mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75.

FeatureFirePro D300GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
TDP
150W-25%
200W
Recommended PSU
350W-42%
600W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
8-pin
Length
242mm
242mm
Height
111mm
112mm
Slots
1-50%
2
Temp (Load)
80°C
75-6%
Perf/Watt
38.1
101.6+167%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the FirePro D300 came in at $500, while the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti launched at $399. On MSRP, GeForce RTX 3060 Ti was 20.2% cheaper ($101 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 11.4 (FirePro D300) vs 50.9 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 346.5% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 3060 Ti (2020 vs 2014).

FeatureFirePro D300GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
MSRP
$500
$399-20%
Performance per Dollar
11.4
50.9+346%
Codename
Pitcairn
GA104
Release
January 18 2014
December 1 2020
Ranking
#506
#73
Search FirePro D300 on AmazonSearch GeForce RTX 3060 Ti on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.