CPU
GPU
FirePro D300
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 3070
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The FirePro D300 is positioned at rank #130 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar FirePro D300
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3070
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce RTX 3070 is significantly newer (2020 vs 2014). The GeForce RTX 3070 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The FirePro D300 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 3070 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 287.5% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (8 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the FirePro D300.
| Insight | FirePro D300 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-287.5%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+287.5%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | 🔮Strong Longevity (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The FirePro D300 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $20 versus $200 for the GeForce RTX 3070, it costs 90% less. While it maintains significantly lower raw performance, this results in a 158.1% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | FirePro D300 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+158.1%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($20) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($200) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of FirePro D300 and GeForce RTX 3070
FirePro D300
The FirePro D300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 18 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,722 points.
GeForce RTX 3070
The GeForce RTX 3070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1725 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,172 points. Launch price was $499.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the FirePro D300 scores 5,722 versus the GeForce RTX 3070's 22,172 — the GeForce RTX 3070 leads by 287.5%. The FirePro D300 is built on GCN 1.0 while the GeForce RTX 3070 uses Ampere, both on 28 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (FirePro D300) vs 5,888 (GeForce RTX 3070). Raw compute: 2.176 TFLOPS (FirePro D300) vs 20.31 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3070).
| Feature | FirePro D300 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,722 | 22,172+287% |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Ampere |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 1280 | 5888+360% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.176 TFLOPS | 20.31 TFLOPS+833% |
| ROPs | 32 | 96+200% |
| TMUs | 80 | 184+130% |
| L1 Cache | 0.31 MB | 5.8 MB+1771% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 4 MB+700% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro D300 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | DLSS 2.0 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro D300 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3070 has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 3070 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (FirePro D300) vs 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3070) — the GeForce RTX 3070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FirePro D300 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 8 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 4 MB+700% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (FirePro D300) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3070). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 4.
| Feature | FirePro D300 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.4+17% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 6+50% | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (FirePro D300) vs NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3070). Decoder: UVD 4.0 vs NVDEC 5th gen. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-4,MPEG-2,VC-1 (FirePro D300) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3070).
| Feature | FirePro D300 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 1.0 | NVENC 7th gen |
| Decoder | UVD 4.0 | NVDEC 5th gen |
| Codecs | H.264,MPEG-4,MPEG-2,VC-1 | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro D300 draws 150W versus the GeForce RTX 3070's 220W — a 37.8% difference. The FirePro D300 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro D300) vs 650W (GeForce RTX 3070). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 242mm vs 242mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | FirePro D300 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W-32% | 220W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-46% | 650W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | 242mm | 242mm |
| Height | 111mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 75°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 38.1 | 100.8+165% |
Value Analysis
The FirePro D300 launched at $500 MSRP and currently averages $20, while the GeForce RTX 3070 launched at $499 and now averages $200. The FirePro D300 costs 90% less ($180 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 286.1 (FirePro D300) vs 110.9 (GeForce RTX 3070) — the FirePro D300 offers 158% better value. The GeForce RTX 3070 is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2014).
| Feature | FirePro D300 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $500 | $499 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $20-90% | $200 |
| Performance per Dollar | 286.1+158% | 110.9 |
| Codename | Pitcairn | GA104 |
| Release | January 18 2014 | September 1 2020 |
| Ranking | #506 | #63 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on FirePro D300 and GeForce RTX 3070
