
FirePro M6100 vs FirePro 3D V8800

FirePro M6100
Popular choices:

FirePro 3D V8800
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar FirePro 3D V8800
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The FirePro M6100 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.3% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the FirePro 3D V8800.
| Insight | FirePro M6100 | FirePro 3D V8800 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.3%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The FirePro M6100 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the FirePro M6100 holds the technical lead. Priced at $30 (vs $30), it costs 0% less, resulting in a 2.3% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | FirePro M6100 | FirePro 3D V8800 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+2.3%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of FirePro M6100 and FirePro 3D V8800

FirePro M6100
The FirePro M6100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 27 2014. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 1100 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,495 points.

FirePro 3D V8800
The FirePro 3D V8800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 26 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 690 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 74W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,438 points. Launch price was $479.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro M6100 scores 2,495 and the FirePro 3D V8800 reaches 2,438 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro M6100 is built on GCN 2.0 while the FirePro 3D V8800 uses TeraScale 2, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 896 (FirePro M6100) vs 800 (FirePro 3D V8800). Raw compute: 1.971 TFLOPS (FirePro M6100) vs 1.104 TFLOPS (FirePro 3D V8800).
| Feature | FirePro M6100 | FirePro 3D V8800 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,495+2% | 2,438 |
| Architecture | GCN 2.0 | TeraScale 2 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 896+12% | 800 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.971 TFLOPS+79% | 1.104 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 56+40% | 40 |
| L1 Cache | 224 KB+180% | 80 KB |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro M6100 | FirePro 3D V8800 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | FirePro M6100 | FirePro 3D V8800 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (FirePro M6100) vs 11.2 (FirePro 3D V8800). Vulkan: 1.2 vs None. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.4. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | FirePro M6100 | FirePro 3D V8800 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12+7% | 11.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | None |
| OpenGL | 4.6+5% | 4.4 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 2.0 (FirePro M6100) vs None (FirePro 3D V8800). Decoder: UVD 4.2 vs UVD 2.3. Supported codecs: H.264 (FirePro M6100) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (FirePro 3D V8800).
| Feature | FirePro M6100 | FirePro 3D V8800 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 2.0 | None |
| Decoder | UVD 4.2 | UVD 2.3 |
| Codecs | H.264 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro M6100 draws 150W versus the FirePro 3D V8800's 74W — a 67.9% difference. The FirePro 3D V8800 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro M6100) vs 350W (FirePro 3D V8800). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 267mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85 vs 85.
| Feature | FirePro M6100 | FirePro 3D V8800 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 74W-51% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 267mm |
| Height | 0mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85 | 85 |
| Perf/Watt | 16.6 | 32.9+98% |
Value Analysis
The FirePro M6100 launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $30, while the FirePro 3D V8800 launched at $1499 and now averages $30. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 83.2 (FirePro M6100) vs 81.3 (FirePro 3D V8800) — the FirePro M6100 offers 2.3% better value. The FirePro M6100 is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2010).
| Feature | FirePro M6100 | FirePro 3D V8800 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $1499 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $30 | $30 |
| Performance per Dollar | 83.2+2% | 81.3 |
| Codename | Emerald | Juniper |
| Release | May 27 2014 | April 26 2010 |
| Ranking | #638 | #780 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













