FirePro M6100 vs Radeon RX 550X

FirePro M6100

2014Core: 1100 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon RX 550X

2018Core: 1100 MHzBoost: 1183 MHz
Similar parts
·······

FirePro M6100 vs Radeon RX 550X Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FirePro M6100 vs Radeon RX 550X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FirePro M6100

2014

Why buy it

  • Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
  • 2014 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 21.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $109 MSRP).
  • 200% higher power demand at 150W vs 50W.

Radeon RX 550X

2018

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 21.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($109 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
  • FirePro M6100 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon RX 550X is the less risky modern option long term.
  • Draws 50W instead of 150W, a 100W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • 2018 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
FirePro M6100 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 4.8% in PassMark G3D (2,495 vs 2,381), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon RX 550X is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs 2 GB of VRAM, the newer feature stack, with FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) and FSR Frame Generation (2023), while FirePro M6100 is limited to no meaningful modern upscaling stack and no comparable frame-generation support, a 14nm process instead of 28nm, and a newer 2018 generation instead of 2014. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon RX 550X makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. FirePro M6100 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

FirePro M6100 vs Radeon RX 550X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

FirePro M6100

The FirePro M6100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 27 2014. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 1100 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,495 points.

AMD

Radeon RX 550X

The Radeon RX 550X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 16 2018. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1100 MHz to 1183 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,381 points.

Graphics Performance

The FirePro M6100 scores 2,495 and the Radeon RX 550X reaches 2,381 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro M6100 is built on GCN 2.0 while the Radeon RX 550X uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 896 (FirePro M6100) vs 512 (Radeon RX 550X). Raw compute: 1.971 TFLOPS (FirePro M6100) vs 1.211 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 550X).

FeatureFirePro M6100Radeon RX 550X
G3D Mark Score
2,495+5%
2,381
Architecture
GCN 2.0
GCN 4.0
Process Node
28 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
896+75%
512
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.971 TFLOPS+63%
1.211 TFLOPS
ROPs
16
16
TMUs
56+75%
32
L1 Cache
224 KB+75%
128 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
512 KB+100%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The clearest feature edge for the Radeon RX 550X is support for FSR Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The FirePro M6100 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.

FeatureFirePro M6100Radeon RX 550X
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
FSR Frame Generation
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro M6100 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 550X carries 4 GB. Radeon RX 550X gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro M6100 and 128-bit on the Radeon RX 550X. L2 Cache: 256 KB (FirePro M6100) vs 512 KB (Radeon RX 550X) — the Radeon RX 550X has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureFirePro M6100Radeon RX 550X
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
4 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
256 KB
512 KB+100%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (FirePro M6100) vs 12 (Radeon RX 550X). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.

FeatureFirePro M6100Radeon RX 550X
DirectX
12
12
Vulkan
1.2
1.3+8%
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4+100%
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 2.0 (FirePro M6100) vs UVD (Radeon RX 550X). Decoder: UVD 4.2 vs VCE. Supported codecs: H.264 (FirePro M6100) vs H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX 550X).

FeatureFirePro M6100Radeon RX 550X
Encoder
VCE 2.0
UVD
Decoder
UVD 4.2
VCE
Codecs
H.264
H.264,HEVC,VP9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro M6100 draws 150W versus the Radeon RX 550X's 50W — a 100% difference. The Radeon RX 550X is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro M6100) vs 300W (Radeon RX 550X). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Card length: 0mm vs 145mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85 vs 85°C.

FeatureFirePro M6100Radeon RX 550X
TDP
150W
50W-67%
Recommended PSU
350W
300W-14%
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
None
Length
0mm
145mm
Height
0mm
111mm
Slots
0-100%
2
Temp (Load)
85
85°C
Perf/Watt
16.6
47.6+187%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the FirePro M6100 came in at $0, while the Radeon RX 550X launched at $109. On MSRP, FirePro M6100 was 100+% cheaper ($109 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (FirePro M6100) vs 21.8 (Radeon RX 550X) — the FirePro M6100 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Radeon RX 550X (2018 vs 2014).

FeatureFirePro M6100Radeon RX 550X
MSRP
$0-100%
$109
Performance per Dollar
Infinity
21.8
Codename
Emerald
Lexa
Release
May 27 2014
December 16 2018
Ranking
#638
#642

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.