
FirePro M6100

UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs
FirePro M6100 vs UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
FirePro M6100 vs UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
FirePro M6100 vs UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
FirePro M6100
2014Why buy it
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs Unknown).
- ✅UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs is already obsolete for modern gaming, so FirePro M6100 is the less risky modern option long term.
Trade-offs
- ❌2014 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌435.7% higher power demand at 150W vs 28W.
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs
2020Why buy it
- ✅Draws 28W instead of 150W, a 122W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022) on 10nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2020 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro M6100 vs UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FirePro M6100
The FirePro M6100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 27 2014. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 1100 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,495 points.

UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs
The UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs is manufactured by Intel. It was released in August 15 2020. It features the Gen. 11 Ice Lake architecture. The core clock ranges from 350 MHz to 1450 MHz. It has 48 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 28W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,400 points.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro M6100 scores 2,495 and the UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs reaches 2,400 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro M6100 is built on GCN 2.0 while the UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs uses Gen. 11 Ice Lake, both on 28 nm vs 10 nm. Shader units: 896 (FirePro M6100) vs 48 (UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs).
| Feature | FirePro M6100 | UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,495+4% | 2,400 |
| Architecture | GCN 2.0 | Gen. 11 Ice Lake |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 10 nm |
| Shading Units | 896+1767% | 48 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro M6100 | UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro M6100 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs carries 0 MB. FirePro M6100 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro M6100 and System on the UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs.
| Feature | FirePro M6100 | UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | System |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (FirePro M6100) vs 12 (12_1) (UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.
| Feature | FirePro M6100 | UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12 (12_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.3+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+33% | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 2.0 (FirePro M6100) vs Quick Sync (Tiger Lake) (UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs). Decoder: UVD 4.2 vs Quick Sync (Tiger Lake). Supported codecs: H.264 (FirePro M6100) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs).
| Feature | FirePro M6100 | UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 2.0 | Quick Sync (Tiger Lake) |
| Decoder | UVD 4.2 | Quick Sync (Tiger Lake) |
| Codecs | H.264 | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro M6100 draws 150W versus the UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs's 28W — a 137.1% difference. The UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro M6100) vs 1W (UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 85 vs 85.
| Feature | FirePro M6100 | UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 28W-81% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Integrated |
| Length | 0mm | 0mm |
| Height | 0mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 85 | 85 |
| Perf/Watt | 16.6 | 85.7+416% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the FirePro M6100 came in at $0, while the UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs launched at $0. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (FirePro M6100) vs Infinity (UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs) — the UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs offers NaN% better value. The newer card here is UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs (2020 vs 2014).
| Feature | FirePro M6100 | UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0 | $0 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | Infinity |
| Codename | Emerald | Tiger Lake Xe |
| Release | May 27 2014 | August 15 2020 |
| Ranking | #638 | #712 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















