G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

FirePro W7000 Adapter

2012

Why buy it

✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).

Trade-offs

❌Very weak future-proofing: 2012-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌
808.1% HIGHER MSRP
$899 MSRPvs$99 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 4.9 vs 41.4 G3D/$ ($899 MSRP vs $99 MSRP).
❌172.7% higher power demand at 150W vs 55W.

Radeon RX 460 (móvel)

2016

Why buy it

✅Costs $800 less on MSRP ($99 MSRP vs $899 MSRP).
✅Delivers 749.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 41.4 vs 4.9 G3D/$ ($99 MSRP vs $899 MSRP).
✅Draws 55W instead of 150W, a 95W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.

FirePro W7000 Adapter

2012

Radeon RX 460 (móvel)

2016

Why buy it

✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).

Why buy it

✅Costs $800 less on MSRP ($99 MSRP vs $899 MSRP).
✅Delivers 749.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 41.4 vs 4.9 G3D/$ ($99 MSRP vs $899 MSRP).
✅Draws 55W instead of 150W, a 95W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Very weak future-proofing: 2012-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌
808.1% HIGHER MSRP
$899 MSRPvs$99 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 4.9 vs 41.4 G3D/$ ($899 MSRP vs $99 MSRP).
❌172.7% higher power demand at 150W vs 55W.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.

Quick Answers

So, is FirePro W7000 Adapter better than Radeon RX 460 (móvel)?

Yes, but this is not really about a huge raw performance gap. The broader synthetic picture is also very close at 4,383 vs 4,100 in G3D Mark. The bigger reason to prefer FirePro W7000 Adapter is the overall package: you are getting no meaningful modern upscaling stack.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

FirePro W7000 Adapter is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more VRAM at 4 GB instead of 2 GB and the stronger feature stack with no meaningful modern upscaling stack instead of FSR upscaling. That extra memory headroom makes it the safer pick for newer games, heavier textures, and higher settings over time.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

FirePro W7000 Adapter is the smarter buy by a wide margin. FirePro W7000 Adapter is about 808.1% more expensive on MSRP at $899 MSRP versus $99 MSRP, and you are getting 6.9% higher G3D Mark. Radeon RX 460 (móvel) really only makes sense now as a very cheap stopgap or a used-market placeholder.

When does Radeon RX 460 (móvel) make more sense than FirePro W7000 Adapter?

Yes. Radeon RX 460 (móvel) is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, lower power draw (55W vs 150W), and staying closer to $99 MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of FirePro W7000 Adapter. The trade-off is that FirePro W7000 Adapter currently gives you 6.9% higher G3D Mark. Radeon RX 460 (móvel) still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

FirePro W7000 Adapter Benchmark Check

Radeon RX 460 (móvel) Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	FirePro W7000 Adapter	Radeon RX 460 (móvel)
1080p
low	103 FPS	36 FPS
medium	88 FPS	22 FPS
high	71 FPS	16 FPS
ultra	42 FPS	8 FPS
1440p
low	90 FPS	24 FPS
medium	77 FPS	14 FPS
high	56 FPS	8 FPS
ultra	32 FPS	4 FPS
4K
low	28 FPS	9 FPS
medium	27 FPS	6 FPS
high	18 FPS	4 FPS
ultra	15 FPS	3 FPS

Open FirePro W7000 Adapter Open Radeon RX 460 (móvel)

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	FirePro W7000 Adapter	Radeon RX 460 (móvel)
1080p
low	134 FPS	64 FPS
medium	101 FPS	37 FPS
high	80 FPS	26 FPS
ultra	51 FPS	16 FPS
1440p
low	77 FPS	31 FPS
medium	52 FPS	19 FPS
high	38 FPS	12 FPS
ultra	27 FPS	9 FPS
4K
low	28 FPS	8 FPS
medium	19 FPS	6 FPS
high	15 FPS	5 FPS
ultra	11 FPS	3 FPS

Open FirePro W7000 Adapter Open Radeon RX 460 (móvel)

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	FirePro W7000 Adapter	Radeon RX 460 (móvel)
1080p
low	197 FPS	184 FPS
medium	158 FPS	148 FPS
high	131 FPS	123 FPS
ultra	99 FPS	92 FPS
1440p
low	148 FPS	138 FPS
medium	118 FPS	111 FPS
high	99 FPS	92 FPS
ultra	74 FPS	69 FPS
4K
low	99 FPS	92 FPS
medium	79 FPS	74 FPS
high	66 FPS	62 FPS
ultra	49 FPS	46 FPS

Open FirePro W7000 Adapter Open Radeon RX 460 (móvel)

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	FirePro W7000 Adapter	Radeon RX 460 (móvel)
1080p
low	181 FPS	131 FPS
medium	146 FPS	104 FPS
high	128 FPS	83 FPS
ultra	99 FPS	70 FPS
1440p
low	127 FPS	96 FPS
medium	104 FPS	77 FPS
high	92 FPS	63 FPS
ultra	67 FPS	50 FPS
4K
low	73 FPS	57 FPS
medium	57 FPS	44 FPS
high	45 FPS	34 FPS
ultra	31 FPS	25 FPS

Open FirePro W7000 Adapter Open Radeon RX 460 (móvel)

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of FirePro W7000 Adapter and Radeon RX 460 (móvel)

FirePro W7000 Adapter

The FirePro W7000 Adapter is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 13 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 950 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,383 points. Launch price was $899.

Radeon RX 460 (móvel)

The Radeon RX 460 (móvel) is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 8 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1180 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,100 points. Launch price was $86.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the FirePro W7000 Adapter scores 4,383 versus the Radeon RX 460 (móvel)'s 4,100 — the FirePro W7000 Adapter leads by 6.9%. The FirePro W7000 Adapter is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon RX 460 (móvel) uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (FirePro W7000 Adapter) vs 896 (Radeon RX 460 (móvel)). Raw compute: 2.432 TFLOPS (FirePro W7000 Adapter) vs 2.115 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 460 (móvel)).

Feature	FirePro W7000 Adapter	Radeon RX 460 (móvel)
G3D Mark Score	4,383+7%	4,100
Architecture	GCN 1.0	GCN 4.0
Process Node	28 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	1280+43%	896
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.432 TFLOPS+15%	2.115 TFLOPS
ROPs	32+100%	16
TMUs	80+43%	56
L1 Cache	320 KB+43%	224 KB
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	1 MB+100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	FirePro W7000 Adapter	Radeon RX 460 (móvel)
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro W7000 Adapter comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 460 (móvel) has 2 GB. The FirePro W7000 Adapter offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (FirePro W7000 Adapter) vs 1 MB (Radeon RX 460 (móvel)) — the Radeon RX 460 (móvel) has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	FirePro W7000 Adapter	Radeon RX 460 (móvel)
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+100%	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	1 MB+100%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (FirePro W7000 Adapter) vs 12 (12_0) (Radeon RX 460 (móvel)). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 4.

Feature	FirePro W7000 Adapter	Radeon RX 460 (móvel)
DirectX	12	12 (12_0)
Vulkan	1.2	1.3+8%
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	6+50%	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (FirePro W7000 Adapter) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon RX 460 (móvel)). Decoder: UVD vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (FirePro W7000 Adapter) vs H.264,H.265 (Radeon RX 460 (móvel)).

Feature	FirePro W7000 Adapter	Radeon RX 460 (móvel)
Encoder	VCE 1.0	VCE 3.4
Decoder	UVD	UVD 6.3
Codecs	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2	H.264,H.265

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro W7000 Adapter draws 150W versus the Radeon RX 460 (móvel)'s 55W — a 92.7% difference. The Radeon RX 460 (móvel) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro W7000 Adapter) vs 350W (Radeon RX 460 (móvel)). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 242mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 90°C vs 75.

Feature	FirePro W7000 Adapter	Radeon RX 460 (móvel)
TDP	150W	55W-63%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	242mm	0mm
Height	111mm	0mm
Slots	1	0-100%
Temp (Load)	90°C	75-17%
Perf/Watt	29.2	74.5+155%

💰

Value Analysis

The FirePro W7000 Adapter launched at $899 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 460 (móvel) launched at $99. The Radeon RX 460 (móvel) costs 89% less ($800 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 4.9 (FirePro W7000 Adapter) vs 41.4 (Radeon RX 460 (móvel)) — the Radeon RX 460 (móvel) offers 744.9% better value. The Radeon RX 460 (móvel) is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2012).