G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FirePro W7000 Adapter vs Radeon RX 460 (móvel) FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

FirePro W7000 Adapter vs Radeon RX 460 (móvel): Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FirePro W7000 Adapter

2012

Why buy it

✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).

Trade-offs

❌2012 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
808.1% HIGHER MSRP
$899 MSRPvs$99 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 4.9 vs 41.4 G3D/$ ($899 MSRP vs $99 MSRP).
❌172.7% higher power demand at 150W vs 55W.

Radeon RX 460 (móvel)

2016

Why buy it

✅Costs $800 less on MSRP ($99 MSRP vs $899 MSRP).
✅Delivers 749.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 41.4 vs 4.9 G3D/$ ($99 MSRP vs $899 MSRP).
✅Draws 55W instead of 150W, a 95W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2016 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

FirePro W7000 Adapter is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 6.9% in PassMark G3D (4,383 vs 4,100), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

FirePro W7000 Adapter is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs 2 GB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon RX 460 (móvel) makes the most sense to buy today. It is $800 cheaper on MSRP at $99 vs $899, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 749.4% (41.4 vs 4.9), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon RX 460 (móvel) is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, FirePro W7000 Adapter has the stronger long-term case.

FirePro W7000 Adapter vs Radeon RX 460 (móvel) Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FirePro W7000 Adapter

The FirePro W7000 Adapter is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 13 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 950 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,383 points. Launch price was $899.

Radeon RX 460 (móvel)

The Radeon RX 460 (móvel) is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 8 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1180 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,100 points. Launch price was $86.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the FirePro W7000 Adapter scores 4,383 versus the Radeon RX 460 (móvel)'s 4,100 — the FirePro W7000 Adapter leads by 6.9%. The FirePro W7000 Adapter is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon RX 460 (móvel) uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (FirePro W7000 Adapter) vs 896 (Radeon RX 460 (móvel)). Raw compute: 2.432 TFLOPS (FirePro W7000 Adapter) vs 2.115 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 460 (móvel)).

Feature	FirePro W7000 Adapter	Radeon RX 460 (móvel)
G3D Mark Score	4,383+7%	4,100
Architecture	GCN 1.0	GCN 4.0
Process Node	28 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	1280+43%	896
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.432 TFLOPS+15%	2.115 TFLOPS
ROPs	32+100%	16
TMUs	80+43%	56
L1 Cache	320 KB+43%	224 KB
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	1 MB+100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	FirePro W7000 Adapter	Radeon RX 460 (móvel)
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro W7000 Adapter has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 460 (móvel) carries 2 GB. FirePro W7000 Adapter gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro W7000 Adapter and 128-bit on the Radeon RX 460 (móvel). L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (FirePro W7000 Adapter) vs 1 MB (Radeon RX 460 (móvel)) — the Radeon RX 460 (móvel) has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	FirePro W7000 Adapter	Radeon RX 460 (móvel)
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+100%	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	1 MB+100%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (FirePro W7000 Adapter) vs 12 (12_0) (Radeon RX 460 (móvel)). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 4.

Feature	FirePro W7000 Adapter	Radeon RX 460 (móvel)
DirectX	12	12 (12_0)
Vulkan	1.2	1.3+8%
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	6+50%	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (FirePro W7000 Adapter) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon RX 460 (móvel)). Decoder: UVD vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (FirePro W7000 Adapter) vs H.264,H.265 (Radeon RX 460 (móvel)).

Feature	FirePro W7000 Adapter	Radeon RX 460 (móvel)
Encoder	VCE 1.0	VCE 3.4
Decoder	UVD	UVD 6.3
Codecs	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2	H.264,H.265

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro W7000 Adapter draws 150W versus the Radeon RX 460 (móvel)'s 55W — a 92.7% difference. The Radeon RX 460 (móvel) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro W7000 Adapter) vs 350W (Radeon RX 460 (móvel)). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 242mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 90°C vs 75.

Feature	FirePro W7000 Adapter	Radeon RX 460 (móvel)
TDP	150W	55W-63%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	242mm	0mm
Height	111mm	0mm
Slots	1	0-100%
Temp (Load)	90°C	75-17%
Perf/Watt	29.2	74.5+155%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the FirePro W7000 Adapter came in at $899, while the Radeon RX 460 (móvel) launched at $99. On MSRP, Radeon RX 460 (móvel) was 89% cheaper ($800 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 4.9 (FirePro W7000 Adapter) vs 41.4 (Radeon RX 460 (móvel)) — the Radeon RX 460 (móvel) offers 744.9% better value. The newer card here is Radeon RX 460 (móvel) (2016 vs 2012).

Feature	FirePro W7000 Adapter	Radeon RX 460 (móvel)
MSRP	$899	$99-89%
Performance per Dollar	4.9	41.4+745%
Codename	Pitcairn	Baffin
Release	June 13 2012	August 8 2016
Ranking	#477	#499

Search FirePro W7000 Adapter on Amazon

Search Radeon RX 460 (móvel) on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.