FX-6200 vs Xeon E3-1260L
FX-6200
Xeon E3-1260L
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The FX-6200 is positioned at rank 701 and the Xeon E3-1260L is on rank 750, so the FX-6200 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar FX-6200
Performance Per Dollar Xeon E3-1260L
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | FX-6200 | Xeon E3-1260L |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($25) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($270) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Zambezi (2011−2012) / 32 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | FX-6200 | Xeon E3-1260L |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+990%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($25) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($270) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of FX-6200 and Xeon E3-1260L
FX-6200
The FX-6200 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 27 February 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Zambezi (2011−2012) architecture. It features 6 cores and 6 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 8192 kB. L2 cache: 6144 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,114 points. Launch price was $69.
Xeon E3-1260L
The Xeon E3-1260L is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 April 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,076 points. Launch price was $150.
Processing Power
The FX-6200 packs 6 cores / 6 threads, while the Xeon E3-1260L offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the FX-6200 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.1 GHz on the FX-6200 versus 3.3 GHz on the Xeon E3-1260L — a 21.6% clock advantage for the FX-6200 (base: 3.8 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The FX-6200 uses the Zambezi (2011−2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Xeon E3-1260L uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the FX-6200 scores 4,114 against the Xeon E3-1260L's 4,076 — a 0.9% lead for the FX-6200. L3 cache: 8192 kB on the FX-6200 vs 8 MB (total) on the Xeon E3-1260L.
| Feature | FX-6200 | Xeon E3-1260L |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 6+50% | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 4.1 GHz+24% | 3.3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.8 GHz+58% | 2.4 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 8192 kB | 8 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 6144 kB+2300% | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 32 nm | 32 nm |
| Architecture | Zambezi (2011−2012) | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) |
| PassMark | 4,114 | 4,076 |
Memory & Platform
The FX-6200 uses the AM3+ socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Xeon E3-1260L uses LGA1155 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | FX-6200 | Xeon E3-1260L |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM3+ | LGA1155 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 2.0 |
Value Analysis
The FX-6200 launched at $169 MSRP, while the Xeon E3-1260L debuted at $294. At current prices ($25 vs $270), the FX-6200 is $245 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the FX-6200 delivers 164.6 pts/$ vs 15.1 pts/$ for the Xeon E3-1260L — making the FX-6200 the 166.4% better value option.
| Feature | FX-6200 | Xeon E3-1260L |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $169-43% | $294 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $25-91% | $270 |
| Performance per Dollar | 164.6+990% | 15.1 |
| Release Date | 2012 | 2011 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on FX-6200 and Xeon E3-1260L
