
Radeon RX 6300

NVS 810
Radeon RX 6300 vs NVS 810 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Radeon RX 6300 vs NVS 810 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
Radeon RX 6300 vs NVS 810: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Radeon RX 6300
2022Why buy it
- ✅+346.2% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $640 less on MSRP ($60 MSRP vs $700 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 5106% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 88.7 vs 1.7 G3D/$ ($60 MSRP vs $700 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 6nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
NVS 810
2015Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (1,192 vs 5,319).
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌1066.7% HIGHER MSRP$700 MSRPvs$60 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.7 vs 88.7 G3D/$ ($700 MSRP vs $60 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon RX 6300 vs NVS 810 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon RX 6300
The Radeon RX 6300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2000 MHz to 2400 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,319 points.

NVS 810
The NVS 810 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 4 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 902 MHz to 1033 MHz. It has 512 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 68W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,192 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Radeon RX 6300 scores 5,319 versus the NVS 810's 1,192 — the Radeon RX 6300 leads by 346.2%. The Radeon RX 6300 is built on RDNA 2.0 while the NVS 810 uses Maxwell, both on 6 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 768 (Radeon RX 6300) vs 512 (NVS 810). Raw compute: 3.686 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6300) vs 1.058 TFLOPS ×2 (NVS 810). Boost clocks: 2400 MHz vs 1033 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6300 | NVS 810 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,319+346% | 1,192 |
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 768+50% | 512 ×2 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.686 TFLOPS+248% | 1.058 TFLOPS ×2 |
| Boost Clock | 2400 MHz+132% | 1033 MHz |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 ×2 |
| TMUs | 48+50% | 32 ×2 |
| L1 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The clearest feature edge for the Radeon RX 6300 is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The NVS 810 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6300 | NVS 810 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 3 | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 4 GB of video memory. Memory bus width is 32-bit on the Radeon RX 6300 and 64-bit on the NVS 810.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6300 | NVS 810 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 32-bit | 64-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12_2 (Radeon RX 6300) vs 12 (12_1) (NVS 810). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 8.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6300 | NVS 810 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12_2 | 12 (12_1) |
| Max Displays | 2 | 8+300% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 3.0 (Radeon RX 6300) vs NVENC 5 (NVS 810). Decoder: VCN 3.0 vs NVDEC 2.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6300 | NVS 810 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 3.0 | NVENC 5 |
| Decoder | VCN 3.0 | NVDEC 2 |
| Codecs | — | H.264,H.265 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX 6300 draws 35W versus the NVS 810's 68W — a 64.1% difference. The Radeon RX 6300 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (Radeon RX 6300) vs 350W (NVS 810). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 160mm vs 198mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6300 | NVS 810 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 35W-49% | 68W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-14% | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 160mm | 198mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 152.0+769% | 17.5 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Radeon RX 6300 came in at $60, while the NVS 810 launched at $700. On MSRP, Radeon RX 6300 was 91.4% cheaper ($640 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 88.7 (Radeon RX 6300) vs 1.7 (NVS 810) — the Radeon RX 6300 offers 5117.6% better value. The newer card here is Radeon RX 6300 (2022 vs 2015).
| Feature | Radeon RX 6300 | NVS 810 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $60-91% | $700 |
| Performance per Dollar | 88.7+5118% | 1.7 |
| Codename | Navi 24 | GM107 |
| Release | January 4 2022 | November 4 2015 |
| Ranking | #379 | #826 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















