GeForce 240M GT
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
GeForce 240M GT vs GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce 240M GT vs GeForce RTX 3050 6GB FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce 240M GT vs GeForce RTX 3050 6GB: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce 240M GT
2015Why buy it
- ✅Costs $69 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 33W instead of 70W, a 37W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3050 6GB across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 3.2 vs 63.6 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024Why buy it
- ✅1337.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 1887.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 3.2 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅1100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 512 MB).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌112.1% higher power demand at 70W vs 33W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce 240M GT vs GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
GeForce 240M GT
The GeForce 240M GT is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1072 MHz to 1176 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 320 points.
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce 240M GT scores 320 versus the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB's 10,749 — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB leads by 3259.1%. The GeForce 240M GT is built on Maxwell while the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB uses Ampere, both on 28 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 240M GT) vs 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB). Raw compute: 0.9032 TFLOPS (GeForce 240M GT) vs 6.774 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB). Boost clocks: 1176 MHz vs 1470 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce 240M GT | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 320 | 10,749+3259% |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Ampere |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 2304+500% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.9032 TFLOPS | 6.774 TFLOPS+650% |
| Boost Clock | 1176 MHz | 1470 MHz+25% |
| ROPs | 8 | 32+300% |
| TMUs | 24 | 72+200% |
| L1 Cache | 0.19 MB | 2.3 MB+1111% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB supports the newer DLSS 2 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce 240M GT is capped at Upscaling support.
| Feature | GeForce 240M GT | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | DLSS 2 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce 240M GT has 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB carries 6 GB. GeForce RTX 3050 6GB gives you 1100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 240M GT and 96-bit on the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 240M GT) vs 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce 240M GT | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 6 GB+1100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | 168 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+33% | 96-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.1 (GeForce 240M GT) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB). OpenGL: 3.3 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce 240M GT | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.1 | 12 Ultimate+19% |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6+39% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 4+100% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (GeForce 240M GT) vs NVENC (5th Gen) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB). Decoder: PureVideo VP4 vs NVDEC (7th Gen). Supported codecs: MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264 (GeForce 240M GT) vs H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB).
| Feature | GeForce 240M GT | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | NVENC (5th Gen) |
| Decoder | PureVideo VP4 | NVDEC (7th Gen) |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264 | H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 240M GT draws 33W versus the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB's 70W — a 71.8% difference. The GeForce 240M GT is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 240M GT) vs 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB). Power connectors: Legacy vs None. Card length: 0mm vs 160mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce 240M GT | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 33W-53% | 70W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 300W-14% |
| Power Connector | Legacy | None |
| Length | 0mm | 160mm |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 75°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 9.7 | 153.6+1484% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce 240M GT came in at $100, while the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB launched at $169. On MSRP, GeForce 240M GT was 40.8% cheaper ($69 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 3.2 (GeForce 240M GT) vs 63.6 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 1887.5% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 3050 6GB (2024 vs 2015).
| Feature | GeForce 240M GT | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100-41% | $169 |
| Performance per Dollar | 3.2 | 63.6+1888% |
| Codename | GM108 | GA107 |
| Release | March 13 2015 | February 2 2024 |
| Ranking | #847 | #252 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce 240M GT and GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
