GeForce 240M GT vs Radeon R3

CPU

GPU

GeForce 240M GT

2015Core: 1072 MHzBoost: 1176 MHz

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

Radeon R3

2019Core: 1082 MHzBoost: 1218 MHz

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

GeForce 240M GT vs Radeon R3 Performance Spectrum

GeForce 240M GT

0.5 GB 33

320

+1.9%

GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU

Radeon R3

0.5 GB 50

314

0.0%

Mobility Radeon HD 530v

Radeon HD 4650 AGP

Radeon HD4650

Radeon R5 235X

Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire

Radeon RX 6550M

Radeon RX 7600M XT

Radeon RX 6700 XT

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce 240M GT vs Radeon R3 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce 240M GT vs Radeon R3: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce 240M GT

2015

Why buy it

✅1.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Draws 33W instead of 50W, a 17W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
100% HIGHER MSRP
$100 MSRPvs$50 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 3.2 vs 6.3 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $50 MSRP).

Radeon R3

2019

Why buy it

✅Costs $50 less on MSRP ($50 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
✅Delivers 96.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 6.3 vs 3.2 G3D/$ ($50 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
✅GeForce 240M GT is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon R3 is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce 240M GT across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2019 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
❌51.5% higher power demand at 50W vs 33W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce 240M GT is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 1.7% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 1.9% in PassMark G3D (320 vs 314), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon R3 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 14nm process instead of 28nm, and a newer 2019 generation instead of 2015. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon R3 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $50 cheaper on MSRP at $50 vs $100, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 96.3% (6.3 vs 3.2), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. GeForce 240M GT still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce 240M GT vs Radeon R3 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 240M GT

The GeForce 240M GT is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1072 MHz to 1176 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 320 points.

Radeon R3

The Radeon R3 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2019. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1082 MHz to 1218 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 314 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce 240M GT scores 320 and the Radeon R3 reaches 314 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 240M GT is built on Maxwell while the Radeon R3 uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 240M GT) vs 512 (Radeon R3). Raw compute: 0.9032 TFLOPS (GeForce 240M GT) vs 1.247 TFLOPS (Radeon R3). Boost clocks: 1176 MHz vs 1218 MHz.

Feature	GeForce 240M GT	Radeon R3
G3D Mark Score	320+2%	314
Architecture	Maxwell	GCN 4.0
Process Node	28 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	384	512+33%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.9032 TFLOPS	1.247 TFLOPS+38%
Boost Clock	1176 MHz	1218 MHz+4%
ROPs	8	16+100%
TMUs	24	32+33%
L1 Cache	192 KB+50%	128 KB
L2 Cache	1 MB+100%	0.5 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce 240M GT gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon R3 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce 240M GT	Radeon R3
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 240M GT and 64-bit on the Radeon R3. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 240M GT) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon R3) — the GeForce 240M GT has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce 240M GT	Radeon R3
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	1 MB+100%	0.5 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 10.1 (GeForce 240M GT) vs 12 (12_0) (Radeon R3). OpenGL: 3.3 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

Feature	GeForce 240M GT	Radeon R3
DirectX	10.1	12 (12_0)+19%
OpenGL	3.3	4.6+39%
Max Displays	2	2

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (GeForce 240M GT) vs VCE 2.0 (Radeon R3). Decoder: PureVideo VP4 vs UVD 4.2. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264 (GeForce 240M GT) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 (Radeon R3).

Feature	GeForce 240M GT	Radeon R3
Encoder	None	VCE 2.0
Decoder	PureVideo VP4	UVD 4.2
Codecs	MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 240M GT draws 33W versus the Radeon R3's 50W — a 41% difference. The GeForce 240M GT is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 240M GT) vs 350W (Radeon R3). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 70°C.

Feature	GeForce 240M GT	Radeon R3
TDP	33W-34%	50W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	Legacy	PCIe-powered
Length	0mm	—
Height	0mm	—
Slots	1	0-100%
Temp (Load)	80°C	70°C-13%
Perf/Watt	9.7+54%	6.3

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce 240M GT came in at $100, while the Radeon R3 launched at $50. On MSRP, Radeon R3 was 50% cheaper ($50 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 3.2 (GeForce 240M GT) vs 6.3 (Radeon R3) — the Radeon R3 offers 96.9% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R3 (2019 vs 2015).

Feature	GeForce 240M GT	Radeon R3
MSRP	$100	$50-50%
Performance per Dollar	3.2	6.3+97%
Codename	GM108	Polaris 23
Release	March 13 2015	May 13 2019
Ranking	#847	#757

Search GeForce 240M GT on Amazon

Search Radeon R3 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.