GeForce 8200
VS
FirePro 2460

GeForce 8200 vs FirePro 2460

NVIDIA

GeForce 8200

2014Core: 1082 MHzBoost: 1150 MHz
VS

FirePro 2460

2012Core: 750 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce 8200 is positioned at rank 517 and the FirePro 2460 is on rank 353, so the FirePro 2460 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce 8200

#507
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
2648%
#509
2400%
#510
2394%
#514
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
2177%
#515
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
2162%
#517
GeForce 8200
MSRP: $40|Avg: $5
100%
#518
Mobility Radeon HD 545v
MSRP: $49|Avg: $15
100%
#519
GeForce 9500M G
MSRP: $30|Avg: $30
99%
#520
99%
#521
99%
#522
Radeon HD 8550G + 8500M Dual
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
98%
#523
Radeon HD 8610G + 8670M Dual
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
98%
#524
97%
#525
97%
#526
Mobility Radeon HD 4830
MSRP: $130|Avg: $20
96%
#527
96%
#528
Radeon HD 8610G + 8600M Dual
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
96%
#529
Radeon HD 7660G + 8670M Dual
MSRP: $150|Avg: $40
96%
#530
Mobility Radeon HD 4550
MSRP: $49|Avg: $15
95%
#531
95%
#532
Radeon HD 7620G + 8670M Dual
MSRP: $150|Avg: $30
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar FirePro 2460

#338
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
15716%
#353
FirePro 2460
MSRP: $180|Avg: $10
100%
#355
Quadro FX 580
MSRP: $199|Avg: $500
97%
#356
FirePro 3D V5700
MSRP: $599|Avg: $25
97%
#358
GRID M60-1B
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $120
96%
#359
FireStream 9270
MSRP: $1499|Avg: $20
95%
#360
FirePro 2260
MSRP: $129|Avg: $15
94%
#361
Quadro 400
MSRP: $169|Avg: $500
94%
#362
Quadro FX 380 LP
MSRP: $169|Avg: $15
91%
#364
Quadro FX 1800
MSRP: $489|Avg: $100
86%
#365
FirePro 3D V8700
MSRP: $1499|Avg: $1229
85%
#366
FirePro 3D V9800
MSRP: $3499|Avg: $80
85%
#367
Quadro 5000
MSRP: $2499|Avg: $100
84%
#368
FirePro V9800
MSRP: $3499|Avg: $250
83%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The FirePro 2460 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.7% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce 8200.

InsightGeForce 8200FirePro 2460
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-3.7%)
Leading raw performance (+3.7%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Maxwell (2014−2017))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce 8200 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce 8200 holds the technical lead. Priced at $5 (vs $10), it costs 50% less, resulting in a 92.9% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightGeForce 8200FirePro 2460
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+92.9%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($5)
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($10)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 8200 and FirePro 2460

NVIDIA

GeForce 8200

The GeForce 8200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 22 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1082 MHz to 1150 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 164 points.

AMD

FirePro 2460

The FirePro 2460 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 13 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 750 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 170 points. Launch price was $599.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce 8200 scores 164 and the FirePro 2460 reaches 170 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 8200 is built on Maxwell while the FirePro 2460 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 256 (GeForce 8200) vs 512 (FirePro 2460). Raw compute: 0.5888 TFLOPS (GeForce 8200) vs 0.768 TFLOPS (FirePro 2460).

FeatureGeForce 8200FirePro 2460
G3D Mark Score
164
170+4%
Architecture
Maxwell
GCN 1.0
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
256
512+100%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.5888 TFLOPS
0.768 TFLOPS+30%
ROPs
8
16+100%
TMUs
16
32+100%
L1 Cache
128 KB
128 KB
L2 Cache
1 MB+300%
0.25 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce 8200FirePro 2460
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 8200) vs 0.25 MB (FirePro 2460) — the GeForce 8200 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce 8200FirePro 2460
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
1 MB+300%
0.25 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 10.0 (GeForce 8200) vs 11 (FirePro 2460). OpenGL: 3.3 vs 4.4. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 4.

FeatureGeForce 8200FirePro 2460
DirectX
10.0
11+10%
OpenGL
3.3
4.4+33%
Max Displays
1
4+300%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: No (GeForce 8200) vs UVD 2.3 (FirePro 2460). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP3 vs UVD 2.3. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (GeForce 8200) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (FirePro 2460).

FeatureGeForce 8200FirePro 2460
Encoder
No
UVD 2.3
Decoder
PureVideo HD VP3
UVD 2.3
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1
MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 8200 draws 33W versus the FirePro 2460's 75W — a 77.8% difference. The GeForce 8200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 8200) vs 350W (FirePro 2460). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 170mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 65°C.

FeatureGeForce 8200FirePro 2460
TDP
33W-56%
75W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
170mm
Height
0mm
69mm
Slots
0-100%
1
Temp (Load)
70°C
65°C-7%
Perf/Watt
5.0+117%
2.3
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce 8200 launched at $40 MSRP and currently averages $5, while the FirePro 2460 launched at $180 and now averages $10. The GeForce 8200 costs 50% less ($5 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 32.8 (GeForce 8200) vs 17.0 (FirePro 2460) — the GeForce 8200 offers 92.9% better value. The GeForce 8200 is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2012).

FeatureGeForce 8200FirePro 2460
MSRP
$40-78%
$180
Avg Price (30d)
$5-50%
$10
Performance per Dollar
32.8+93%
17.0
Codename
GM108
Cape Verde
Release
July 22 2014
June 13 2012
Ranking
#832
#732