
GeForce 8200 vs FirePro 2460

GeForce 8200
Popular choices:

FirePro 2460
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce 8200 is positioned at rank 517 and the FirePro 2460 is on rank 353, so the FirePro 2460 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 8200
Performance Per Dollar FirePro 2460
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The FirePro 2460 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.7% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce 8200.
| Insight | GeForce 8200 | FirePro 2460 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3.7%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+3.7%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce 8200 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce 8200 holds the technical lead. Priced at $5 (vs $10), it costs 50% less, resulting in a 92.9% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce 8200 | FirePro 2460 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+92.9%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($5) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($10) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 8200 and FirePro 2460

GeForce 8200
The GeForce 8200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 22 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1082 MHz to 1150 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 164 points.

FirePro 2460
The FirePro 2460 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 13 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 750 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 170 points. Launch price was $599.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce 8200 scores 164 and the FirePro 2460 reaches 170 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 8200 is built on Maxwell while the FirePro 2460 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 256 (GeForce 8200) vs 512 (FirePro 2460). Raw compute: 0.5888 TFLOPS (GeForce 8200) vs 0.768 TFLOPS (FirePro 2460).
| Feature | GeForce 8200 | FirePro 2460 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 164 | 170+4% |
| Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 256 | 512+100% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.5888 TFLOPS | 0.768 TFLOPS+30% |
| ROPs | 8 | 16+100% |
| TMUs | 16 | 32+100% |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB | 128 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+300% | 0.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce 8200 | FirePro 2460 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 8200) vs 0.25 MB (FirePro 2460) — the GeForce 8200 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce 8200 | FirePro 2460 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+300% | 0.25 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.0 (GeForce 8200) vs 11 (FirePro 2460). OpenGL: 3.3 vs 4.4. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce 8200 | FirePro 2460 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.0 | 11+10% |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.4+33% |
| Max Displays | 1 | 4+300% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No (GeForce 8200) vs UVD 2.3 (FirePro 2460). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP3 vs UVD 2.3. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (GeForce 8200) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (FirePro 2460).
| Feature | GeForce 8200 | FirePro 2460 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No | UVD 2.3 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP3 | UVD 2.3 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 8200 draws 33W versus the FirePro 2460's 75W — a 77.8% difference. The GeForce 8200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 8200) vs 350W (FirePro 2460). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 170mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 65°C.
| Feature | GeForce 8200 | FirePro 2460 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 33W-56% | 75W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 170mm |
| Height | 0mm | 69mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C | 65°C-7% |
| Perf/Watt | 5.0+117% | 2.3 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce 8200 launched at $40 MSRP and currently averages $5, while the FirePro 2460 launched at $180 and now averages $10. The GeForce 8200 costs 50% less ($5 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 32.8 (GeForce 8200) vs 17.0 (FirePro 2460) — the GeForce 8200 offers 92.9% better value. The GeForce 8200 is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2012).
| Feature | GeForce 8200 | FirePro 2460 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $40-78% | $180 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $5-50% | $10 |
| Performance per Dollar | 32.8+93% | 17.0 |
| Codename | GM108 | Cape Verde |
| Release | July 22 2014 | June 13 2012 |
| Ranking | #832 | #732 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.











