GeForce 8200 vs GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
GeForce 8200
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The GeForce 8200 is positioned at rank #517 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 8200
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is significantly newer (2022 vs 2014). The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce 8200 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 7151.2% higher G3D Mark score and 1500% more VRAM (8 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce 8200.
| Insight | GeForce 8200 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-7151.2%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+7151.2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $150 (vs $5), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 141.7% better value per dollar than the GeForce 8200.
| Insight | GeForce 8200 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+141.7%) |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($5) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($150) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 8200 and GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
GeForce 8200
The GeForce 8200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 22 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1082 MHz to 1150 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 164 points.
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1515 MHz to 1755 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,892 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce 8200 scores 164 versus the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM's 11,892 — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM leads by 7151.2%. The GeForce 8200 is built on Maxwell while the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM uses Ampere, both on 28 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 256 (GeForce 8200) vs 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Raw compute: 0.5888 TFLOPS (GeForce 8200) vs 8.986 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Boost clocks: 1150 MHz vs 1755 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce 8200 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 164 | 11,892+7151% |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Ampere |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 256 | 2560+900% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.5888 TFLOPS | 8.986 TFLOPS+1426% |
| Boost Clock | 1150 MHz | 1755 MHz+53% |
| ROPs | 8 | 32+300% |
| TMUs | 16 | 80+400% |
| L1 Cache | 0.13 MB | 2.5 MB+1823% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce 8200 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | DLSS 2.0 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce 8200 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM offers 1500% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 8200) vs 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce 8200 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 8 GB+1500% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | 224 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.0 (GeForce 8200) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Vulkan: None vs 1.3. OpenGL: 3.3 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce 8200 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.0 | 12.2+22% |
| Vulkan | None | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6+39% |
| Max Displays | 1 | 4+300% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No (GeForce 8200) vs 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP3 vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (GeForce 8200) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM).
| Feature | GeForce 8200 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No | 8th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP3 | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 8200 draws 33W versus the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM's 130W — a 119% difference. The GeForce 8200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 8200) vs 450W (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Power connectors: Legacy vs 8-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 235mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce 8200 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 33W-75% | 130W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-22% | 450W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | 8-pin |
| Length | 0mm | 235mm |
| Height | 0mm | 124mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-7% | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 5.0 | 91.5+1730% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce 8200 launched at $40 MSRP and currently averages $5, while the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM launched at $249 and now averages $150. The GeForce 8200 costs 96.7% less ($145 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 32.8 (GeForce 8200) vs 79.3 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM offers 141.8% better value. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2014).
| Feature | GeForce 8200 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $40-84% | $249 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $5-97% | $150 |
| Performance per Dollar | 32.8 | 79.3+142% |
| Codename | GM108 | GA106 |
| Release | July 22 2014 | January 4 2022 |
| Ranking | #832 | #224 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce 8200 and GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
