CPU
GPU
GeForce 9300M GS
Popular choices:
GeForce 8300 GS
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce 9300M GS is positioned at rank 686 and the GeForce 8300 GS is on rank 625, so the GeForce 8300 GS offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 9300M GS
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 8300 GS
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce 9300M GS is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.6% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce 8300 GS offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GeForce 9300M GS | GeForce 8300 GS |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.6%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.6%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce 9300M GS offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce 9300M GS holds the technical lead. Priced at $10 (vs $50), it costs 80% less, resulting in a 413% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce 9300M GS | GeForce 8300 GS |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+413%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($10) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($50) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 9300M GS and GeForce 8300 GS
GeForce 9300M GS
The GeForce 9300M GS is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 549 MHz to 549 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 118 points.
GeForce 8300 GS
The GeForce 8300 GS is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 22 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1082 MHz to 1150 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 115 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce 9300M GS scores 118 and the GeForce 8300 GS reaches 115 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 9300M GS is built on Maxwell while the GeForce 8300 GS uses Maxwell, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 9300M GS) vs 256 (GeForce 8300 GS). Raw compute: 0.4216 TFLOPS (GeForce 9300M GS) vs 0.5888 TFLOPS (GeForce 8300 GS). Boost clocks: 549 MHz vs 1150 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce 9300M GS | GeForce 8300 GS |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 118+3% | 115 |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 384+50% | 256 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.4216 TFLOPS | 0.5888 TFLOPS+40% |
| Boost Clock | 549 MHz | 1150 MHz+109% |
| ROPs | 8 | 8 |
| TMUs | 24+50% | 16 |
| L1 Cache | 192 KB+50% | 128 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce 9300M GS | GeForce 8300 GS |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce 9300M GS comes with 256 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce 8300 GS has 512 MB. The GeForce 8300 GS offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | GeForce 9300M GS | GeForce 8300 GS |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.25 GB | 0.5 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.0 (GeForce 9300M GS) vs 10.0 (GeForce 8300 GS). Vulkan: None vs None. OpenGL: 3.3 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce 9300M GS | GeForce 8300 GS |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.0 | 10.0 |
| Vulkan | None | None |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
| Max Displays | 1 | 2+100% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No (GeForce 9300M GS) vs No (GeForce 8300 GS). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP3 vs PureVideo HD VP2. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (GeForce 9300M GS) vs MPEG-2,H.264 (GeForce 8300 GS).
| Feature | GeForce 9300M GS | GeForce 8300 GS |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No | No |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP3 | PureVideo HD VP2 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 | MPEG-2,H.264 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 9300M GS draws 33W versus the GeForce 8300 GS's 33W — a 0% difference. The GeForce 8300 GS is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 9300M GS) vs 350W (GeForce 8300 GS). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy. Card length: 0mm vs 170mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 65°C.
| Feature | GeForce 9300M GS | GeForce 8300 GS |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 33W | 33W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | Legacy |
| Length | 0mm | 170mm |
| Height | 0mm | 106mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 65°C-19% |
| Perf/Watt | 3.6+3% | 3.5 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce 9300M GS launched at $100 MSRP and currently averages $10, while the GeForce 8300 GS launched at $50 and now averages $50. The GeForce 9300M GS costs 80% less ($40 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 11.8 (GeForce 9300M GS) vs 2.3 (GeForce 8300 GS) — the GeForce 9300M GS offers 413% better value. The GeForce 9300M GS is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2014).
| Feature | GeForce 9300M GS | GeForce 8300 GS |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100 | $50-50% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $10-80% | $50 |
| Performance per Dollar | 11.8+413% | 2.3 |
| Codename | GM108 | GM108 |
| Release | March 13 2015 | July 22 2014 |
| Ranking | #880 | #832 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce 9300M GS and GeForce 8300 GS
