
GeForce FX 5700 Ultra
Popular choices:

GeForce 6150 LE
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 6150 LE
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce FX 5700 Ultra uses modern memory architecture. The GeForce FX 5700 Ultra likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce 6150 LE lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce FX 5700 Ultra is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce 6150 LE offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GeForce FX 5700 Ultra | GeForce 6150 LE |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+3%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3%) |
| Longevity | Ampere (2020−2025) (8nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal (2016−2021)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce FX 5700 Ultra remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce FX 5700 Ultra and GeForce 6150 LE

GeForce FX 5700 Ultra
The GeForce FX 5700 Ultra is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in Maio 2022. It features the Rankine architecture. The core clock ranges from 832 MHz to 1155 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 34 points.

GeForce 6150 LE
The GeForce 6150 LE is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 17 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 937 MHz to 1038 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 10W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 33 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce FX 5700 Ultra scores 34 and the GeForce 6150 LE reaches 33 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce FX 5700 Ultra is built on Rankine while the GeForce 6150 LE uses Pascal, both on 8 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GeForce FX 5700 Ultra) vs 384 (GeForce 6150 LE). Raw compute: 4.731 TFLOPS (GeForce FX 5700 Ultra) vs 0.7972 TFLOPS (GeForce 6150 LE). Boost clocks: 1155 MHz vs 1038 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce FX 5700 Ultra | GeForce 6150 LE |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 34+3% | 33 |
| Architecture | Rankine | Pascal |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+433% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.731 TFLOPS+493% | 0.7972 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1155 MHz+11% | 1038 MHz |
| ROPs | 40+150% | 16 |
| TMUs | 64+167% | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 2 MB+1329% | 0.14 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+300% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce FX 5700 Ultra | GeForce 6150 LE |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce FX 5700 Ultra comes with 256 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce 6150 LE has 512 MB. The GeForce 6150 LE offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce FX 5700 Ultra) vs 0.5 MB (GeForce 6150 LE) — the GeForce FX 5700 Ultra has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce FX 5700 Ultra | GeForce 6150 LE |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.25 GB | 0.5 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+300% | 0.5 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 9.0a (GeForce FX 5700 Ultra) vs 9.0c (GeForce 6150 LE). OpenGL: 2.1 vs 2.1. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce FX 5700 Ultra | GeForce 6150 LE |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 9.0a | 9.0c |
| OpenGL | 2.1 | 2.1 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Integrated Decoder ONLY (GeForce FX 5700 Ultra) vs None (GeForce 6150 LE). Decoder: Integrated MPEG-2 Decoder vs PureVideo (VP1). Supported codecs: MPEG-2 (GeForce FX 5700 Ultra) vs MPEG-2,WMV9 (GeForce 6150 LE).
| Feature | GeForce FX 5700 Ultra | GeForce 6150 LE |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Integrated Decoder ONLY | None |
| Decoder | Integrated MPEG-2 Decoder | PureVideo (VP1) |
| Codecs | MPEG-2 | MPEG-2,WMV9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce FX 5700 Ultra draws 25W versus the GeForce 6150 LE's 10W — a 85.7% difference. The GeForce 6150 LE is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce FX 5700 Ultra) vs 350W (GeForce 6150 LE). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy. Card length: 229mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 65.
| Feature | GeForce FX 5700 Ultra | GeForce 6150 LE |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 25W | 10W-60% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | Legacy |
| Length | 229mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 65-13% |
| Perf/Watt | 1.4 | 3.3+136% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce FX 5700 Ultra launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $0, while the GeForce 6150 LE launched at $30 and now averages $10. The GeForce FX 5700 Ultra costs 100+% less ($10 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): Infinity (GeForce FX 5700 Ultra) vs 3.3 (GeForce 6150 LE) — the GeForce FX 5700 Ultra offers Infinity% better value. The GeForce FX 5700 Ultra is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2017).
| Feature | GeForce FX 5700 Ultra | GeForce 6150 LE |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $30 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $0-100% | $10 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | 3.3 |
| Codename | GA107 | GP108 |
| Release | Maio 2022 | May 17 2017 |
| Ranking | #387 | #657 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















