CPU
GPU
GeForce FX 5700 Ultra
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 4060
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 4060
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 4060 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 57394.1% higher G3D Mark score and 3100% more VRAM (8 GB vs 256 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce FX 5700 Ultra.
| Insight | GeForce FX 5700 Ultra | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-57394.1%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+57394.1%) |
| Longevity | Ampere (2020−2025) (8nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 5nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce RTX 4060 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce FX 5700 Ultra and GeForce RTX 4060
GeForce FX 5700 Ultra
The GeForce FX 5700 Ultra is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in Maio 2022. It features the Rankine architecture. The core clock ranges from 832 MHz to 1155 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 34 points.
GeForce RTX 4060
The GeForce RTX 4060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1830 MHz to 2460 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,548 points. Launch price was $299.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce FX 5700 Ultra scores 34 versus the GeForce RTX 4060's 19,548 — the GeForce RTX 4060 leads by 57394.1%. The GeForce FX 5700 Ultra is built on Rankine while the GeForce RTX 4060 uses Ada Lovelace, both on 8 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GeForce FX 5700 Ultra) vs 3,072 (GeForce RTX 4060). Raw compute: 4.731 TFLOPS (GeForce FX 5700 Ultra) vs 15.11 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060). Boost clocks: 1155 MHz vs 2460 MHz. Ray tracing: 16 RT cores (GeForce FX 5700 Ultra) vs 24 (GeForce RTX 4060) with 64 Tensor cores vs 96.
| Feature | GeForce FX 5700 Ultra | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 34 | 19,548+57394% |
| Architecture | Rankine | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048 | 3072+50% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.731 TFLOPS | 15.11 TFLOPS+219% |
| Boost Clock | 1155 MHz | 2460 MHz+113% |
| ROPs | 40 | 48+20% |
| TMUs | 64 | 96+50% |
| L1 Cache | 2 MB | 3 MB+50% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 24 MB+1100% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 16 | 24+50% |
| Tensor Cores | 64 | 96+50% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce FX 5700 Ultra lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | GeForce FX 5700 Ultra | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | DLSS 3.5 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.0 (Native) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce FX 5700 Ultra comes with 256 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4060 has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 4060 offers 3100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce FX 5700 Ultra) vs 24 MB (GeForce RTX 4060) — the GeForce RTX 4060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce FX 5700 Ultra | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.25 GB | 8 GB+3100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | 272 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 24 MB+1100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 9.0a (GeForce FX 5700 Ultra) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4060). OpenGL: 2.1 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce FX 5700 Ultra | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 9.0a | 12 Ultimate+33% |
| OpenGL | 2.1 | 4.6+119% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 4+100% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Integrated Decoder ONLY (GeForce FX 5700 Ultra) vs NVENC 8th gen (GeForce RTX 4060). Decoder: Integrated MPEG-2 Decoder vs NVDEC 5th gen. Supported codecs: MPEG-2 (GeForce FX 5700 Ultra) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060).
| Feature | GeForce FX 5700 Ultra | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Integrated Decoder ONLY | NVENC 8th gen |
| Decoder | Integrated MPEG-2 Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen |
| Codecs | MPEG-2 | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce FX 5700 Ultra draws 25W versus the GeForce RTX 4060's 115W — a 128.6% difference. The GeForce FX 5700 Ultra is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce FX 5700 Ultra) vs 550W (GeForce RTX 4060). Power connectors: Legacy vs 8-pin. Card length: 229mm vs 240mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 73°C.
| Feature | GeForce FX 5700 Ultra | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 25W-78% | 115W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-36% | 550W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | 8-pin |
| Length | 229mm | 240mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 73°C-3% |
| Perf/Watt | 1.4 | 170.0+12043% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce FX 5700 Ultra launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $0, while the GeForce RTX 4060 launched at $299 and now averages $299. The GeForce FX 5700 Ultra costs 100+% less ($299 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): Infinity (GeForce FX 5700 Ultra) vs 65.4 (GeForce RTX 4060) — the GeForce FX 5700 Ultra offers Infinity% better value. The GeForce RTX 4060 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2022).
| Feature | GeForce FX 5700 Ultra | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $299 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $0-100% | $299 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | 65.4 |
| Codename | GA107 | AD107 |
| Release | Maio 2022 | May 18 2023 |
| Ranking | #387 | #84 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce FX 5700 Ultra and GeForce RTX 4060
