GeForce Go 6400
VS
GeForce Go 6100

GeForce Go 6400 vs GeForce Go 6100

NVIDIA

GeForce Go 6400

2012Core: 902 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce Go 6100

2017Core: 1228 MHzBoost: 1468 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce Go 6400 is positioned at rank 338 and the GeForce Go 6100 is on rank 344, so the GeForce Go 6400 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce Go 6400

#1
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
MSRP: $399|Avg: $280
9068%
#2
GeForce RTX 5060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
8711%
#3
Radeon RX 5600 XT
MSRP: $279|Avg: $180
8610%
#4
Radeon RX 9060
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
8595%
#5
GeForce RTX 5050
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
8578%
#6
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
MSRP: $249|Avg: $150
8529%
#7
Arc A580
MSRP: $179|Avg: $179
8421%
#8
Radeon RX 9060 XT
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
8390%
#9
Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
8313%
#10
Radeon RX 7600
MSRP: $269|Avg: $250
8290%
#11
Radeon RX 6600
MSRP: $329|Avg: $180
8190%
#12
GeForce RTX 4060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
8172%
#13
Arc B570
MSRP: $219|Avg: $219
8025%
#14
Arc B580
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
8020%
#323
Radeon R5 430 OEM
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $13
10000%
#338
GeForce Go 6400
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#339
Radeon X1950 GT
MSRP: $140|Avg: $49
95%
#340
GeForce 6600 GT
MSRP: $199|Avg: $50
90%
#341
RADEON X600 PRO
MSRP: $99|Avg: $10
85%
#342
Radeon X1600 Pro
MSRP: $149|Avg: $49
83%
#343
RADEON X300SE
MSRP: $60|Avg: $60
79%
#345
RADEON X800 GTO
MSRP: $199|Avg: $199
72%
#346
Radeon X1600 XT
MSRP: $199|Avg: $15
72%
#347
Radeon X1300
MSRP: $100|Avg: $49
72%
#348
Radeon X1800 GTO
MSRP: $249|Avg: $20
71%
#349
GeForce 7800 GT
MSRP: $449|Avg: $20
68%
#351
RADEON E2400
MSRP: $100|Avg: $100
65%
#352
Radeon X1650 GTO
MSRP: $150|Avg: $20
63%
#353
RADEON X800GT
MSRP: $160|Avg: $10
63%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce Go 6100

#1
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
MSRP: $399|Avg: $280
12090%
#2
GeForce RTX 5060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
11615%
#3
Radeon RX 5600 XT
MSRP: $279|Avg: $180
11480%
#4
Radeon RX 9060
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
11460%
#5
GeForce RTX 5050
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
11437%
#6
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
MSRP: $249|Avg: $150
11372%
#7
Arc A580
MSRP: $179|Avg: $179
11228%
#8
Radeon RX 9060 XT
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
11187%
#9
Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
11083%
#10
Radeon RX 7600
MSRP: $269|Avg: $250
11053%
#11
Radeon RX 6600
MSRP: $329|Avg: $180
10920%
#12
GeForce RTX 4060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
10897%
#13
Arc B570
MSRP: $219|Avg: $219
10700%
#14
Arc B580
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
10693%
#329
Radeon R5 430 OEM
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $13
13333%
#344
GeForce Go 6100
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#345
Radeon X1600 XT
MSRP: $199|Avg: $15
97%
#346
Radeon X1300
MSRP: $100|Avg: $49
97%
#347
RADEON X800 GTO
MSRP: $199|Avg: $199
97%
#348
Radeon X1800 GTO
MSRP: $249|Avg: $20
95%
#349
GeForce 7800 GT
MSRP: $449|Avg: $20
90%
#351
RADEON E2400
MSRP: $100|Avg: $100
87%
#352
Radeon X1650 GTO
MSRP: $150|Avg: $20
83%
#353
RADEON X800GT
MSRP: $160|Avg: $10
83%
#354
RADEON X600 SE
MSRP: $100|Avg: $5
82%
#355
Radeon X1900 GT
MSRP: $299|Avg: $20
82%
#356
RADEON X700
MSRP: $149|Avg: $10
82%
#357
GeForce G200
MSRP: $299|Avg: $15
75%
#358
RADEON X700 PRO
MSRP: $179|Avg: $30
70%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce Go 6400 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 33.3% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce Go 6100 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

InsightGeForce Go 6400GeForce Go 6100
Performance
Leading raw performance (+33.3%)
Lower raw frame rates (-33.3%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Kepler (2012−2018))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal (2016−2021))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+3025%)
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce Go 6400 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce Go 6400 and GeForce Go 6100

NVIDIA

GeForce Go 6400

The GeForce Go 6400 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 5 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 902 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 24 points. Launch price was $99.

NVIDIA

GeForce Go 6100

The GeForce Go 6100 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 17 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1228 MHz to 1468 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 18 points. Launch price was $79.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce Go 6400 scores 24 versus the GeForce Go 6100's 18 — the GeForce Go 6400 leads by 33.3%. The GeForce Go 6400 is built on Kepler while the GeForce Go 6100 uses Pascal, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce Go 6400) vs 384 (GeForce Go 6100). Raw compute: 0.6927 TFLOPS (GeForce Go 6400) vs 1.127 TFLOPS (GeForce Go 6100).

FeatureGeForce Go 6400GeForce Go 6100
G3D Mark Score
24+33%
18
Architecture
Kepler
Pascal
Process Node
28 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
384
384
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.6927 TFLOPS
1.127 TFLOPS+63%
ROPs
16
16
TMUs
32+33%
24
L1 Cache
32 KB
144 KB+350%
L2 Cache
256 KB
512 KB+100%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce Go 6400GeForce Go 6100
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce Go 6400 comes with 16 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce Go 6100 has 512 MB. The GeForce Go 6100 offers 3025% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 256 KB (GeForce Go 6400) vs 512 KB (GeForce Go 6100) — the GeForce Go 6100 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce Go 6400GeForce Go 6100
VRAM Capacity
0.016 GB
0.5 GB+3025%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
256 KB
512 KB+100%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 10.0 (GeForce Go 6400) vs 9.0 (GeForce Go 6100). Vulkan: None vs None. OpenGL: 2.1 vs 2.1. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 2.

FeatureGeForce Go 6400GeForce Go 6100
DirectX
10.0+11%
9.0
Vulkan
None
None
OpenGL
2.1
2.1
Max Displays
1
2+100%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: No (GeForce Go 6400) vs No (GeForce Go 6100). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP2 vs PureVideo. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (GeForce Go 6400) vs MPEG-2,WMV,H.264 (GeForce Go 6100).

FeatureGeForce Go 6400GeForce Go 6100
Encoder
No
No
Decoder
PureVideo HD VP2
PureVideo
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1
MPEG-2,WMV,H.264
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce Go 6400 draws 65W versus the GeForce Go 6100's 30W — a 73.7% difference. The GeForce Go 6100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce Go 6400) vs 350W (GeForce Go 6100). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.

FeatureGeForce Go 6400GeForce Go 6100
TDP
65W
30W-54%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
Legacy
Length
0mm
0mm
Height
0mm
0mm
Slots
0
0
Temp (Load)
75°C-6%
80°C
Perf/Watt
0.4
0.6+50%