GeForce Go 7700 vs GeForce GT 120M

NVIDIA

GeForce Go 7700

2013Core: 1046 MHzBoost: 1085 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GT 120M

2017Core: 1228 MHzBoost: 1468 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce Go 7700 vs GeForce GT 120M Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce Go 7700 vs GeForce GT 120M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce Go 7700 vs GeForce GT 120M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce Go 7700

2013

Why buy it

  • 3.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2013 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 666.7% higher power demand at 230W vs 30W.

GeForce GT 120M

2017

Why buy it

  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).
  • Draws 30W instead of 230W, a 200W reduction.
  • More future proof: Pascal (2016−2021) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than GeForce Go 7700 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2017 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce Go 7700 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 3.4% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward GeForce GT 120M instead at 151 vs 148, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce Go 7700 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GT 120M makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GeForce GT 120M is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce Go 7700 has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce Go 7700 vs GeForce GT 120M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce Go 7700

The GeForce Go 7700 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 30 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 1046 MHz to 1085 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 230W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 148 points. Launch price was $399.

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 120M

The GeForce GT 120M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 17 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1228 MHz to 1468 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 151 points. Launch price was $79.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce Go 7700 scores 148 and the GeForce GT 120M reaches 151 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce Go 7700 is built on Kepler while the GeForce GT 120M uses Pascal, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (GeForce Go 7700) vs 384 (GeForce GT 120M). Raw compute: 3.333 TFLOPS (GeForce Go 7700) vs 1.127 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 120M). Boost clocks: 1085 MHz vs 1468 MHz.

FeatureGeForce Go 7700GeForce GT 120M
G3D Mark Score
148
151+2%
Architecture
Kepler
Pascal
Process Node
28 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
1536+300%
384
Compute (TFLOPS)
3.333 TFLOPS+196%
1.127 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
1085 MHz
1468 MHz+35%
ROPs
32+100%
16
TMUs
128+433%
24
L1 Cache
128 KB
144 KB+13%
L2 Cache
512 KB
512 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce Go 7700GeForce GT 120M
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce Go 7700 has 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GT 120M carries 1 GB. GeForce GT 120M gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce Go 7700 and 64-bit on the GeForce GT 120M.

FeatureGeForce Go 7700GeForce GT 120M
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
1 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
512 KB
512 KB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 9.0c (GeForce Go 7700) vs 11.1 (FL10_0) (GeForce GT 120M). OpenGL: 2.1 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

FeatureGeForce Go 7700GeForce GT 120M
DirectX
9.0c
11.1 (FL10_0)+23%
OpenGL
2.1
3.3+57%
Max Displays
2
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: No (GeForce Go 7700) vs VP3 (GeForce GT 120M). Decoder: PureVideo vs VP3. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,WMV9,H.264 (GeForce Go 7700) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GT 120M).

FeatureGeForce Go 7700GeForce GT 120M
Encoder
No
VP3
Decoder
PureVideo
VP3
Codecs
MPEG-2,WMV9,H.264
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce Go 7700 draws 230W versus the GeForce GT 120M's 30W — a 153.8% difference. The GeForce GT 120M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce Go 7700) vs 350W (GeForce GT 120M). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 80°C.

FeatureGeForce Go 7700GeForce GT 120M
TDP
230W
30W-87%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
0
Temp (Load)
85°C
80°C-6%
Perf/Watt
0.6
5.0+733%