
GeForce Go 7700 vs Radeon X1900 GT

GeForce Go 7700
Popular choices:

Radeon X1900 GT
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar Radeon X1900 GT
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon X1900 GT is significantly newer (2022 vs 2013). The Radeon X1900 GT likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce Go 7700 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce Go 7700 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.4% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (512 MB vs 256 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon X1900 GT.
| Insight | GeForce Go 7700 | Radeon X1900 GT |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.4%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.4%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) (5nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce Go 7700 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

League of Legends

Valorant
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce Go 7700 and Radeon X1900 GT

GeForce Go 7700
The GeForce Go 7700 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 30 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 1046 MHz to 1085 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 230W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 148 points. Launch price was $399.

Radeon X1900 GT
The Radeon X1900 GT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 3 2022. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1387 MHz to 2394 MHz. It has 5376 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 84 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 146 points. Launch price was $899.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce Go 7700 scores 148 and the Radeon X1900 GT reaches 146 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce Go 7700 is built on Kepler while the Radeon X1900 GT uses RDNA 3.0, both on 28 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (GeForce Go 7700) vs 5,376 (Radeon X1900 GT). Raw compute: 3.333 TFLOPS (GeForce Go 7700) vs 51.48 TFLOPS (Radeon X1900 GT). Boost clocks: 1085 MHz vs 2394 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce Go 7700 | Radeon X1900 GT |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 148+1% | 146 |
| Architecture | Kepler | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 1536 | 5376+250% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.333 TFLOPS | 51.48 TFLOPS+1445% |
| Boost Clock | 1085 MHz | 2394 MHz+121% |
| ROPs | 32 | 192+500% |
| TMUs | 128 | 336+163% |
| L1 Cache | 0.13 MB | 3 MB+2208% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 6 MB+1100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce Go 7700 | Radeon X1900 GT |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce Go 7700 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon X1900 GT has 256 MB. The GeForce Go 7700 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GeForce Go 7700) vs 6 MB (Radeon X1900 GT) — the Radeon X1900 GT has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce Go 7700 | Radeon X1900 GT |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB+100% | 0.25 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 6 MB+1100% |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce Go 7700 draws 230W versus the Radeon X1900 GT's 300W — a 26.4% difference. The GeForce Go 7700 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce Go 7700) vs 350W (Radeon X1900 GT). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce Go 7700 | Radeon X1900 GT |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 230W-23% | 300W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 0.6+20% | 0.5 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon X1900 GT is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2013).
| Feature | GeForce Go 7700 | Radeon X1900 GT |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $299 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $20 |
| Codename | GK104 | Navi 31 |
| Release | May 30 2013 | November 3 2022 |
| Ranking | #398 | #21 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













