GeForce Go 7700 vs Radeon HD 7340

NVIDIA

GeForce Go 7700

2013Core: 1046 MHzBoost: 1085 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon HD 7340

2013Core: 800 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce Go 7700 vs Radeon HD 7340 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce Go 7700 vs Radeon HD 7340 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce Go 7700 vs Radeon HD 7340: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce Go 7700

2013

Why buy it

  • 9.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

  • 2013 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 6.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $25 MSRP).
  • 389.4% higher power demand at 230W vs 47W.

Radeon HD 7340

2013

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 6.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($25 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • Draws 47W instead of 230W, a 183W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than GeForce Go 7700 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2013 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce Go 7700 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 9.5% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon HD 7340 instead at 153 vs 148, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce Go 7700 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon HD 7340 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon HD 7340 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce Go 7700 has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce Go 7700 vs Radeon HD 7340 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce Go 7700

The GeForce Go 7700 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 30 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 1046 MHz to 1085 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 230W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 148 points. Launch price was $399.

AMD

Radeon HD 7340

The Radeon HD 7340 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 1 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 47W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 153 points. Launch price was $59.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce Go 7700 scores 148 and the Radeon HD 7340 reaches 153 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce Go 7700 is built on Kepler while the Radeon HD 7340 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,536 (GeForce Go 7700) vs 384 (Radeon HD 7340). Raw compute: 3.333 TFLOPS (GeForce Go 7700) vs 0.6144 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 7340).

FeatureGeForce Go 7700Radeon HD 7340
G3D Mark Score
148
153+3%
Architecture
Kepler
GCN 1.0
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
1536+300%
384
Compute (TFLOPS)
3.333 TFLOPS+442%
0.6144 TFLOPS
ROPs
32+300%
8
TMUs
128+433%
24
L1 Cache
128 KB+33%
96 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB+100%
256 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce Go 7700 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon HD 7340 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce Go 7700Radeon HD 7340
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce Go 7700 and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 7340. L2 Cache: 512 KB (GeForce Go 7700) vs 256 KB (Radeon HD 7340) — the GeForce Go 7700 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce Go 7700Radeon HD 7340
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
512 KB+100%
256 KB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 9.0c (GeForce Go 7700) vs 11.2 (Radeon HD 7340). OpenGL: 2.1 vs 4.4. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 0.

FeatureGeForce Go 7700Radeon HD 7340
DirectX
9.0c
11.2+24%
OpenGL
2.1
4.4+110%
Max Displays
2
0
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: No (GeForce Go 7700) vs UVD 3 (Radeon HD 7340). Decoder: PureVideo vs UVD 3. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,WMV9,H.264 (GeForce Go 7700) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (Radeon HD 7340).

FeatureGeForce Go 7700Radeon HD 7340
Encoder
No
UVD 3
Decoder
PureVideo
UVD 3
Codecs
MPEG-2,WMV9,H.264
H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce Go 7700 draws 230W versus the Radeon HD 7340's 47W — a 132.1% difference. The Radeon HD 7340 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce Go 7700) vs 350W (Radeon HD 7340). Power connectors: Legacy vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 1mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots.

FeatureGeForce Go 7700Radeon HD 7340
TDP
230W
47W-80%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
1x 6-pin
Length
0mm
1mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
0
Temp (Load)
85°C
Perf/Watt
0.6
3.3+450%