GeForce Go 7700 vs GeForce GT 220M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 220M

#348

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

1012%

#350

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

917%

#351

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

915%

#355

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

832%

#356

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

826%

#358

GeForce GT 220M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#359

Radeon R7 M350

MSRP: $100|Avg: $100

99%

#360

GeForce 920MX

MSRP: $100|Avg: $54

99%

#361

Radeon RX Vega11 Ryzen 7 3750H

MSRP: $150|Avg: $45

99%

#362

Radeon HD 7670A

MSRP: $100|Avg: $40

98%

#363

Radeon Vega 8

MSRP: $150|Avg: $40

97%

#367

GeForce 615

MSRP: $50|Avg: $15

94%

#369

Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS

MSRP: $600|Avg: $600

93%

#370

GeForce GT 730A

MSRP: $75|Avg: $20

92%

#372

Radeon HD 7660G

MSRP: $50|Avg: $50

90%

#373

Radeon R7 M270DX

MSRP: $100|Avg: $20

90%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GT 220M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 8.8% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (1 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce Go 7700.

Insight	GeForce Go 7700	GeForce GT 220M
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-8.8%)	✅Leading raw performance (+8.8%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+100%)
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	—	—

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GT 220M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce Go 7700 Benchmark Check

GeForce GT 220M Benchmark Check

League of Legends

No prediction data available

League of Legends

Valorant

No prediction data available

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce Go 7700 and GeForce GT 220M

GeForce Go 7700

The GeForce Go 7700 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 30 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 1046 MHz to 1085 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 230W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 148 points. Launch price was $399.

GeForce GT 220M

The GeForce GT 220M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 9 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 941 MHz to 967 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 161 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce Go 7700 scores 148 versus the GeForce GT 220M's 161 — the GeForce GT 220M leads by 8.8%. The GeForce Go 7700 is built on Kepler while the GeForce GT 220M uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,536 (GeForce Go 7700) vs 384 (GeForce GT 220M). Raw compute: 3.333 TFLOPS (GeForce Go 7700) vs 0.7427 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 220M). Boost clocks: 1085 MHz vs 967 MHz.

Feature	GeForce Go 7700	GeForce GT 220M
G3D Mark Score	148	161+9%
Architecture	Kepler	Kepler
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	1536+300%	384
Compute (TFLOPS)	3.333 TFLOPS+349%	0.7427 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1085 MHz+12%	967 MHz
ROPs	32+100%	16
TMUs	128+300%	32
L1 Cache	128 KB+300%	32 KB
L2 Cache	512 KB+100%	256 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce Go 7700	GeForce GT 220M
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce Go 7700 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GT 220M has 1 GB. The GeForce GT 220M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 512 KB (GeForce Go 7700) vs 256 KB (GeForce GT 220M) — the GeForce Go 7700 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce Go 7700	GeForce GT 220M
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	1 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	512 KB+100%	256 KB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 9.0c (GeForce Go 7700) vs 10.0 (GeForce GT 220M). Vulkan: None vs None. OpenGL: 2.1 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 1.

Feature	GeForce Go 7700	GeForce GT 220M
DirectX	9.0c	10.0+11%
Vulkan	None	None
OpenGL	2.1	3.3+57%
Max Displays	2+100%	1

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: No (GeForce Go 7700) vs No (GeForce GT 220M). Decoder: PureVideo vs PureVideo HD VP3. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,WMV9,H.264 (GeForce Go 7700) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (GeForce GT 220M).

Feature	GeForce Go 7700	GeForce GT 220M
Encoder	No	No
Decoder	PureVideo	PureVideo HD VP3
Codecs	MPEG-2,WMV9,H.264	MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce Go 7700 draws 230W versus the GeForce GT 220M's 50W — a 128.6% difference. The GeForce GT 220M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce Go 7700) vs 350W (GeForce GT 220M). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 70°C.