GeForce Go 7700 vs GeForce GT 220M

NVIDIA

GeForce Go 7700

2013Core: 1046 MHzBoost: 1085 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GT 220M

2013Core: 941 MHzBoost: 967 MHz

GeForce Go 7700 vs GeForce GT 220M Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce Go 7700 vs GeForce GT 220M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce Go 7700 vs GeForce GT 220M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce Go 7700

2013

Why buy it

  • Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than GeForce GT 220M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2013 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 360% higher power demand at 230W vs 50W.

GeForce GT 220M

2013

Why buy it

  • 10.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).
  • Draws 50W instead of 230W, a 180W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • 2013 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce GT 220M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 10.7% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 8.8% in PassMark G3D (161 vs 148), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce Go 7700 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GT 220M makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GeForce GT 220M is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce Go 7700 has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce Go 7700 vs GeForce GT 220M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce Go 7700

The GeForce Go 7700 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 30 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 1046 MHz to 1085 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 230W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 148 points. Launch price was $399.

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 220M

The GeForce GT 220M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 9 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 941 MHz to 967 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 161 points.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce Go 7700 scores 148 versus the GeForce GT 220M's 161 — the GeForce GT 220M leads by 8.8%. The GeForce Go 7700 is built on Kepler while the GeForce GT 220M uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,536 (GeForce Go 7700) vs 384 (GeForce GT 220M). Raw compute: 3.333 TFLOPS (GeForce Go 7700) vs 0.7427 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 220M). Boost clocks: 1085 MHz vs 967 MHz.

FeatureGeForce Go 7700GeForce GT 220M
G3D Mark Score
148
161+9%
Architecture
Kepler
Kepler
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
1536+300%
384
Compute (TFLOPS)
3.333 TFLOPS+349%
0.7427 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
1085 MHz+12%
967 MHz
ROPs
32+100%
16
TMUs
128+300%
32
L1 Cache
128 KB+300%
32 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB+100%
256 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce Go 7700GeForce GT 220M
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce Go 7700 has 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GT 220M carries 1 GB. GeForce GT 220M gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce Go 7700 and 128-bit on the GeForce GT 220M. L2 Cache: 512 KB (GeForce Go 7700) vs 256 KB (GeForce GT 220M) — the GeForce Go 7700 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce Go 7700GeForce GT 220M
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
1 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
512 KB+100%
256 KB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 9.0c (GeForce Go 7700) vs 10.0 (GeForce GT 220M). Vulkan: None vs None. OpenGL: 2.1 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 1.

FeatureGeForce Go 7700GeForce GT 220M
DirectX
9.0c
10.0+11%
Vulkan
None
None
OpenGL
2.1
3.3+57%
Max Displays
2+100%
1
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: No (GeForce Go 7700) vs No (GeForce GT 220M). Decoder: PureVideo vs PureVideo HD VP3. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,WMV9,H.264 (GeForce Go 7700) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (GeForce GT 220M).

FeatureGeForce Go 7700GeForce GT 220M
Encoder
No
No
Decoder
PureVideo
PureVideo HD VP3
Codecs
MPEG-2,WMV9,H.264
MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce Go 7700 draws 230W versus the GeForce GT 220M's 50W — a 128.6% difference. The GeForce GT 220M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce Go 7700) vs 350W (GeForce GT 220M). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 70°C.

FeatureGeForce Go 7700GeForce GT 220M
TDP
230W
50W-78%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
0mm
Height
0mm
0mm
Slots
0
0
Temp (Load)
85°C
70°C-18%
Perf/Watt
0.6
3.2+433%