
GeForce Go 7700

GeForce GT 220M
GeForce Go 7700 vs GeForce GT 220M Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce Go 7700 vs GeForce GT 220M FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce Go 7700 vs GeForce GT 220M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce Go 7700
2013Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GT 220M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2013 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌360% higher power demand at 230W vs 50W.
GeForce GT 220M
2013Why buy it
- ✅10.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 230W, a 180W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌2013 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce Go 7700 vs GeForce GT 220M Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce Go 7700
The GeForce Go 7700 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 30 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 1046 MHz to 1085 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 230W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 148 points. Launch price was $399.

GeForce GT 220M
The GeForce GT 220M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 9 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 941 MHz to 967 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 161 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce Go 7700 scores 148 versus the GeForce GT 220M's 161 — the GeForce GT 220M leads by 8.8%. The GeForce Go 7700 is built on Kepler while the GeForce GT 220M uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,536 (GeForce Go 7700) vs 384 (GeForce GT 220M). Raw compute: 3.333 TFLOPS (GeForce Go 7700) vs 0.7427 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 220M). Boost clocks: 1085 MHz vs 967 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce Go 7700 | GeForce GT 220M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 148 | 161+9% |
| Architecture | Kepler | Kepler |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1536+300% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.333 TFLOPS+349% | 0.7427 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1085 MHz+12% | 967 MHz |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 128+300% | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB+300% | 32 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce Go 7700 | GeForce GT 220M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce Go 7700 has 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GT 220M carries 1 GB. GeForce GT 220M gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce Go 7700 and 128-bit on the GeForce GT 220M. L2 Cache: 512 KB (GeForce Go 7700) vs 256 KB (GeForce GT 220M) — the GeForce Go 7700 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce Go 7700 | GeForce GT 220M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 1 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 9.0c (GeForce Go 7700) vs 10.0 (GeForce GT 220M). Vulkan: None vs None. OpenGL: 2.1 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 1.
| Feature | GeForce Go 7700 | GeForce GT 220M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 9.0c | 10.0+11% |
| Vulkan | None | None |
| OpenGL | 2.1 | 3.3+57% |
| Max Displays | 2+100% | 1 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No (GeForce Go 7700) vs No (GeForce GT 220M). Decoder: PureVideo vs PureVideo HD VP3. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,WMV9,H.264 (GeForce Go 7700) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (GeForce GT 220M).
| Feature | GeForce Go 7700 | GeForce GT 220M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No | No |
| Decoder | PureVideo | PureVideo HD VP3 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,WMV9,H.264 | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce Go 7700 draws 230W versus the GeForce GT 220M's 50W — a 128.6% difference. The GeForce GT 220M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce Go 7700) vs 350W (GeForce GT 220M). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 70°C.
| Feature | GeForce Go 7700 | GeForce GT 220M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 230W | 50W-78% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 0mm |
| Height | 0mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 70°C-18% |
| Perf/Watt | 0.6 | 3.2+433% |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













