GeForce Go 7700 vs Radeon HD 6320

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce Go 7700 vs Radeon HD 6320 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce Go 7700 vs Radeon HD 6320: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce Go 7700

2013

Why buy it

✅More future proof: Kepler (2012−2018) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌2013 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 4.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $30 MSRP).
❌23.7% higher power demand at 230W vs 186W.

Radeon HD 6320

2011

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 4.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($30 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Draws 186W instead of 230W, a 44W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌2011 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce Go 7700 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.7% in PassMark G3D (148 vs 147), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce Go 7700 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 28nm process instead of 40nm and a newer 2013 generation instead of 2011. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon HD 6320 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon HD 6320 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce Go 7700 has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce Go 7700 vs Radeon HD 6320 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce Go 7700

The GeForce Go 7700 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 30 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 1046 MHz to 1085 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 230W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 148 points. Launch price was $399.

Radeon HD 6320

The Radeon HD 6320 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 1 2011. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The core clock speed is 750 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 186W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 147 points. Launch price was $180.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce Go 7700 scores 148 and the Radeon HD 6320 reaches 147 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce Go 7700 is built on Kepler while the Radeon HD 6320 uses TeraScale 3, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (GeForce Go 7700) vs 1,280 (Radeon HD 6320). Raw compute: 3.333 TFLOPS (GeForce Go 7700) vs 1.92 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6320).

Feature	GeForce Go 7700	Radeon HD 6320
G3D Mark Score	148	147
Architecture	Kepler	TeraScale 3
Process Node	28 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	1536+20%	1280
Compute (TFLOPS)	3.333 TFLOPS+74%	1.92 TFLOPS
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	128+60%	80
L1 Cache	128 KB	320 KB+150%
L2 Cache	512 KB	512 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce Go 7700 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon HD 6320 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce Go 7700	Radeon HD 6320
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce Go 7700 and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 6320.

Feature	GeForce Go 7700	Radeon HD 6320
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	512 KB	512 KB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 9.0c (GeForce Go 7700) vs 11.2 (Radeon HD 6320). OpenGL: 2.1 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 0.

Feature	GeForce Go 7700	Radeon HD 6320
DirectX	9.0c	11.2+24%
OpenGL	2.1	4.5+114%
Max Displays	2	0

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: No (GeForce Go 7700) vs UVD 3 (Radeon HD 6320). Decoder: PureVideo vs UVD 3. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,WMV9,H.264 (GeForce Go 7700) vs H.264,MPEG-2 (Radeon HD 6320).

Feature	GeForce Go 7700	Radeon HD 6320
Encoder	No	UVD 3
Decoder	PureVideo	UVD 3
Codecs	MPEG-2,WMV9,H.264	H.264,MPEG-2

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce Go 7700 draws 230W versus the Radeon HD 6320's 186W — a 21.2% difference. The Radeon HD 6320 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce Go 7700) vs 350W (Radeon HD 6320). Power connectors: Legacy vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 1mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots.

Feature	GeForce Go 7700	Radeon HD 6320
TDP	230W	186W-19%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	Legacy	1x 6-pin
Length	0mm	1mm
Height	0mm	—
Slots	0	0
Temp (Load)	85°C	—
Perf/Watt	0.6	0.8+33%

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce Go 7700 (2013 vs 2011).

Feature	GeForce Go 7700	Radeon HD 6320
MSRP	—	$30
Codename	GK104	Cayman
Release	May 30 2013	December 1 2011
Ranking	#398	#598

Search GeForce Go 7700 on Amazon

Search Radeon HD 6320 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.