GeForce GT 140 vs GeForce 810A
GeForce GT 140
Popular choices:
GeForce 810A
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce GT 140 is positioned at rank 188 and the GeForce 810A is on rank 433, so the GeForce GT 140 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 140
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 810A
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GT 140 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.5% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (1 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce 810A.
| Insight | GeForce GT 140 | GeForce 810A |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.5%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.5%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GT 140 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GT 140 holds the technical lead. Priced at $15 (vs $20), it costs 25% less, resulting in a 33.9% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GT 140 | GeForce 810A |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+33.9%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($15) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($20) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GT 140 and GeForce 810A
GeForce GT 140
The GeForce GT 140 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 29 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 993 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 64W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 658 points. Launch price was $89.
GeForce 810A
The GeForce 810A is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 22 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1082 MHz to 1150 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 655 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GT 140 scores 658 and the GeForce 810A reaches 655 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 140 is built on Kepler while the GeForce 810A uses Maxwell, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 140) vs 256 (GeForce 810A). Raw compute: 0.7626 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 140) vs 0.5888 TFLOPS (GeForce 810A).
| Feature | GeForce GT 140 | GeForce 810A |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 658 | 655 |
| Architecture | Kepler | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 384+50% | 256 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.7626 TFLOPS+30% | 0.5888 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16+100% | 8 |
| TMUs | 32+100% | 16 |
| L1 Cache | 32 KB | 128 KB+300% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 1 MB+300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GT 140 | GeForce 810A |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GT 140 comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce 810A has 512 MB. The GeForce GT 140 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (GeForce GT 140) vs 1 MB (GeForce 810A) — the GeForce 810A has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GT 140 | GeForce 810A |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB+100% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 1 MB+300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.0 (GeForce GT 140) vs 11.0 (GeForce 810A). Vulkan: None vs 1.1. OpenGL: 3.3 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 1.
| Feature | GeForce GT 140 | GeForce 810A |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.0 | 11.0+10% |
| Vulkan | None | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.5+36% |
| Max Displays | 2+100% | 1 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No (GeForce GT 140) vs No (GeForce 810A). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP3 vs PureVideo HD VP5. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (GeForce GT 140) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 (GeForce 810A).
| Feature | GeForce GT 140 | GeForce 810A |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No | No |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP3 | PureVideo HD VP5 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GT 140 draws 64W versus the GeForce 810A's 33W — a 63.9% difference. The GeForce 810A is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 140) vs 350W (GeForce 810A). Power connectors: None vs Legacy. Card length: 229mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 70°C.
| Feature | GeForce GT 140 | GeForce 810A |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 64W | 33W-48% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | Legacy |
| Length | 229mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 70°C-18% |
| Perf/Watt | 10.3 | 19.8+92% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GT 140 launched at $99 MSRP and currently averages $15, while the GeForce 810A launched at $100 and now averages $20. The GeForce GT 140 costs 25% less ($5 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 43.9 (GeForce GT 140) vs 32.8 (GeForce 810A) — the GeForce GT 140 offers 33.8% better value.
| Feature | GeForce GT 140 | GeForce 810A |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $99-1% | $100 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $15-25% | $20 |
| Performance per Dollar | 43.9+34% | 32.8 |
| Codename | GK107 | GM108 |
| Release | May 29 2014 | July 22 2014 |
| Ranking | #777 | #832 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GT 140 and GeForce 810A
