GeForce GT 325M
VS
Radeon HD 7350

GeForce GT 325M vs Radeon HD 7350

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 325M

2013Core: 980 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon HD 7350

2012Boost: 1250 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce GT 325M is positioned at rank 274 and the Radeon HD 7350 is on rank 254, so the Radeon HD 7350 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 325M

#264
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
639%
#266
579%
#267
577%
#271
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
525%
#272
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
521%
#274
GeForce GT 325M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $20
100%
#275
GeForce GTS 160M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $30
100%
#276
GeForce GTX 470M SLI
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $60
100%
#277
Radeon Vega 8 Ryzen 3 3200G
MSRP: $99|Avg: $70
99%
#279
Radeon RX Vega 9
MSRP: $99|Avg: $50
99%
#282
Iris Xe Graphics G7
MSRP: $200|Avg: $100
97%
#283
Radeon R9 M395
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
97%
#285
GeForce GT 755M SLI
MSRP: $200|Avg: $50
96%
#286
GeForce GTX 950A
MSRP: $159|Avg: $30
96%
#288
Radeon 540X
MSRP: $99|Avg: $40
94%
#289
GeForce 930MX
MSRP: $80|Avg: $25
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 7350

#1
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
MSRP: $399|Avg: $280
1756%
#2
GeForce RTX 5060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
1687%
#3
Radeon RX 5600 XT
MSRP: $279|Avg: $180
1668%
#4
Radeon RX 9060
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
1665%
#5
GeForce RTX 5050
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
1662%
#6
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
MSRP: $249|Avg: $150
1652%
#7
Arc A580
MSRP: $179|Avg: $179
1631%
#8
Radeon RX 9060 XT
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
1625%
#9
Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
1610%
#10
Radeon RX 7600
MSRP: $269|Avg: $250
1606%
#11
Radeon RX 6600
MSRP: $329|Avg: $180
1586%
#12
GeForce RTX 4060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
1583%
#13
Arc B570
MSRP: $219|Avg: $219
1554%
#14
Arc B580
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
1554%
#239
Radeon R5 430 OEM
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $13
1937%
#254
Radeon HD 7350
MSRP: $40|Avg: $10
100%
#255
GeForce GTX 285
MSRP: $359|Avg: $30
100%
#256
Radeon HD 7570
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
98%
#257
Radeon HD 6380G
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
97%
#258
Radeon HD 4550
MSRP: $59|Avg: $15
97%
#259
RADEON HD7450
MSRP: $50|Avg: $15
96%
#260
GeForce GT 330
MSRP: $99|Avg: $30
96%
#262
Radeon HD 7340G
MSRP: $50|Avg: $15
95%
#263
Radeon HD 8210E
MSRP: $50|Avg: $50
94%
#264
Radeon 535DX
MSRP: $200|Avg: $40
94%
#266
GeForce GT 120 / 9500 GT
MSRP: $85|Avg: $15
92%
#267
GeForce GT 130
MSRP: $100|Avg: $20
92%
#268
Radeon M535DX
MSRP: $200|Avg: $40
91%
#269
Radeon HD 7310G
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
88%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GT 325M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (1 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon HD 7350.

InsightGeForce GT 325MRadeon HD 7350
Performance
Leading raw performance (+3%)
Lower raw frame rates (-3%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
✅ More VRAM (+100%)
❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit

💎 Value Proposition

The Radeon HD 7350 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon HD 7350 holds the technical lead. Priced at $10 (vs $20), it costs 50% less, resulting in a 94.1% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightGeForce GT 325MRadeon HD 7350
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+94.1%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($20)
More affordable ($10)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GT 325M and Radeon HD 7350

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 325M

The GeForce GT 325M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 25 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 980 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 170 points.

AMD

Radeon HD 7350

The Radeon HD 7350 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 31 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1250 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 165 points. Launch price was $449.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GT 325M scores 170 and the Radeon HD 7350 reaches 165 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 325M is built on Kepler while the Radeon HD 7350 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 325M) vs 1,792 (Radeon HD 7350). Raw compute: 0.7526 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 325M) vs 2.867 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 7350).

FeatureGeForce GT 325MRadeon HD 7350
G3D Mark Score
170+3%
165
Architecture
Kepler
GCN 1.0
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
384
1792+367%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.7526 TFLOPS
2.867 TFLOPS+281%
ROPs
16
32+100%
TMUs
32
112+250%
L1 Cache
32 KB
448 KB+1300%
L2 Cache
256 KB
768 KB+200%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce GT 325MRadeon HD 7350
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GT 325M comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 7350 has 512 MB. The GeForce GT 325M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 256 KB (GeForce GT 325M) vs 768 KB (Radeon HD 7350) — the Radeon HD 7350 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GT 325MRadeon HD 7350
VRAM Capacity
1 GB+100%
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
256 KB
768 KB+200%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 325M draws 50W versus the Radeon HD 7350's 200W — a 120% difference. The GeForce GT 325M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 325M) vs 350W (Radeon HD 7350). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.

FeatureGeForce GT 325MRadeon HD 7350
TDP
50W-75%
200W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
1x 6-pin
Slots
0
Perf/Watt
3.4+325%
0.8
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon HD 7350 costs 50% less ($10 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 8.5 (GeForce GT 325M) vs 16.5 (Radeon HD 7350) — the Radeon HD 7350 offers 94.1% better value. The GeForce GT 325M is the newer GPU (2013 vs 2012).

FeatureGeForce GT 325MRadeon HD 7350
MSRP
$40
Avg Price (30d)
$20
$10-50%
Performance per Dollar
8.5
16.5+94%
Codename
GK107
Tahiti
Release
June 25 2013
January 31 2012
Ranking
#726
#454