G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GT 425M vs GeForce RTX 3050 6GB FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GT 425M vs GeForce RTX 3050 6GB: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GT 425M

2013

Why buy it

✅Draws 45W instead of 70W, a 25W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3050 6GB across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 1 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
❌2013 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 63.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $169 MSRP).

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

2024

Why buy it

✅1287.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 1 GB).
✅Better long-term bet: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌55.6% higher power demand at 70W vs 45W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 1287.4% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 2054.1% in PassMark G3D (10,749 vs 499), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 6 GB vs 1 GB of VRAM, the newer upscaling stack, DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 8nm process instead of 28nm, and 18 vs 0 ray-tracing units. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

GeForce GT 425M vs GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GT 425M

The GeForce GT 425M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 1 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 549 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 499 points.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GT 425M scores 499 versus the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB's 10,749 — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB leads by 2054.1%. The GeForce GT 425M is built on Kepler while the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB uses Ampere, both on 28 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 425M) vs 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB). Raw compute: 0.4216 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 425M) vs 6.774 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB).

Feature	GeForce GT 425M	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
G3D Mark Score	499	10,749+2054%
Architecture	Kepler	Ampere
Process Node	28 nm	8 nm
Shading Units	384	2304+500%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.4216 TFLOPS	6.774 TFLOPS+1507%
ROPs	16	32+100%
TMUs	32	72+125%
L1 Cache	0.03 MB	2.3 MB+7567%
L2 Cache	0.25 MB	2 MB+700%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB supports the newer DLSS 2 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce GT 425M is capped at Upscaling support.

Feature	GeForce GT 425M	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	DLSS 2 Super Resolution
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GT 425M has 1 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB carries 6 GB. GeForce RTX 3050 6GB gives you 500% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GT 425M and 96-bit on the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (GeForce GT 425M) vs 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GT 425M	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
VRAM Capacity	1 GB	6 GB+500%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	168 GB/s
Bus Width	128-bit+33%	96-bit
L2 Cache	0.25 MB	2 MB+700%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.0 (GeForce GT 425M) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB). Vulkan: None vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.0 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce GT 425M	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
DirectX	11.0	12 Ultimate+9%
Vulkan	None	1.3
OpenGL	4.0	4.6+15%
Max Displays	1	4+300%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: No (GeForce GT 425M) vs NVENC (5th Gen) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP4 vs NVDEC (7th Gen). Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GT 425M) vs H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB).

Feature	GeForce GT 425M	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
Encoder	No	NVENC (5th Gen)
Decoder	PureVideo HD VP4	NVDEC (7th Gen)
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP	H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only)

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 425M draws 45W versus the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB's 70W — a 43.5% difference. The GeForce GT 425M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 425M) vs 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Card length: 0mm vs 160mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75°C.

Feature	GeForce GT 425M	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
TDP	45W-36%	70W
Recommended PSU	350W	300W-14%
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	None
Length	0mm	160mm
Height	0mm	—
Slots	0-100%	2
Temp (Load)	75°C	75°C
Perf/Watt	11.1	153.6+1284%

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce RTX 3050 6GB (2024 vs 2013).

Feature	GeForce GT 425M	GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
MSRP	—	$169
Codename	GK107	GA107
Release	April 1 2013	February 2 2024
Ranking	#857	#252

Search GeForce GT 425M on Amazon

Search GeForce RTX 3050 6GB on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.