GeForce GT 620 vs GeForce 8800M GTS
GeForce GT 620
Popular choices:
GeForce 8800M GTS
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The GeForce GT 620 is positioned at rank #190 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 620
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GT 620 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.6% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce 8800M GTS.
| Insight | GeForce GT 620 | GeForce 8800M GTS |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.6%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.6%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / G9x (2007−2010)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GT 620 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GT 620 and GeForce 8800M GTS
GeForce GT 620
The GeForce GT 620 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 5 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 902 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 388 points. Launch price was $99.
GeForce 8800M GTS
The GeForce 8800M GTS is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 15 2008. It features the G9x architecture. The core clock speed is 500 MHz. It has 224 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 65 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 382 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GT 620 scores 388 and the GeForce 8800M GTS reaches 382 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 620 is built on Kepler while the GeForce 8800M GTS uses G9x, both on 28 nm vs 65 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 620) vs 224 (GeForce 8800M GTS).
| Feature | GeForce GT 620 | GeForce 8800M GTS |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 388+2% | 382 |
| Architecture | Kepler | G9x |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 65 nm |
| Shading Units | 384+71% | 224 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GT 620 | GeForce 8800M GTS |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GT 620 | GeForce 8800M GTS |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.0 (GeForce GT 620) vs 10.0 (GeForce 8800M GTS). Vulkan: None vs None. OpenGL: 4.2 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce GT 620 | GeForce 8800M GTS |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.0+10% | 10.0 |
| Vulkan | None | None |
| OpenGL | 4.2+27% | 3.3 |
| Max Displays | 3+50% | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No (GeForce GT 620) vs No (GeForce 8800M GTS). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP5 vs PureVideo HD VP2. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GT 620) vs MPEG-2,H.264 (GeForce 8800M GTS).
| Feature | GeForce GT 620 | GeForce 8800M GTS |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No | No |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP5 | PureVideo HD VP2 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP | MPEG-2,H.264 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GT 620 draws 65W versus the GeForce 8800M GTS's 150W — a 79.1% difference. The GeForce GT 620 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 250W (GeForce GT 620) vs 350W (GeForce 8800M GTS). Power connectors: None vs Legacy. Card length: 145mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 95°C.
| Feature | GeForce GT 620 | GeForce 8800M GTS |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 65W-57% | 150W |
| Recommended PSU | 250W-29% | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | Legacy |
| Length | 145mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-26% | 95°C |
| Perf/Watt | 6.0+140% | 2.5 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GT 620 is the newer GPU (2012 vs 2008).
| Feature | GeForce GT 620 | GeForce 8800M GTS |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $59 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $20 | — |
| Codename | GK107 | NB9E-GTX |
| Release | June 5 2012 | July 15 2008 |
| Ranking | #837 | #825 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GT 620 and GeForce 8800M GTS
