
GeForce GT 620

GeForce RTX 4060
GeForce GT 620 vs GeForce RTX 4060 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GT 620 vs GeForce RTX 4060 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GT 620 vs GeForce RTX 4060: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GT 620
2012Why buy it
- ✅Costs $240 less on MSRP ($59 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 115W, a 50W reduction.
- ✅Measures 145mm instead of 240mm, a 95mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌2012 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 6.6 vs 65.4 G3D/$ ($59 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 4060
2023Why buy it
- ✅2569.3% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 894.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 65.4 vs 6.6 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $59 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅1500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 512 MB).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌76.9% higher power demand at 115W vs 65W.
- ❌65.5% longer card at 240mm vs 145mm.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GT 620 vs GeForce RTX 4060 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GT 620
The GeForce GT 620 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 5 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 902 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 388 points. Launch price was $99.

GeForce RTX 4060
The GeForce RTX 4060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1830 MHz to 2460 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,548 points. Launch price was $299.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GT 620 scores 388 versus the GeForce RTX 4060's 19,548 — the GeForce RTX 4060 leads by 4938.1%. The GeForce GT 620 is built on Kepler while the GeForce RTX 4060 uses Ada Lovelace, both on 28 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 620) vs 3,072 (GeForce RTX 4060). Raw compute: 0.6927 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 620) vs 15.11 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060).
| Feature | GeForce GT 620 | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 388 | 19,548+4938% |
| Architecture | Kepler | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 3072+700% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.6927 TFLOPS | 15.11 TFLOPS+2081% |
| ROPs | 16 | 48+200% |
| TMUs | 32 | 96+200% |
| L1 Cache | 0.03 MB | 3 MB+9900% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 24 MB+9500% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The clearest feature edge for the GeForce RTX 4060 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The GeForce GT 620 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 supports the newer DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce GT 620 is capped at Upscaling support.
| Feature | GeForce GT 620 | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GT 620 has 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4060 carries 8 GB. GeForce RTX 4060 gives you 1500% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GT 620 and 128-bit on the GeForce RTX 4060. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (GeForce GT 620) vs 24 MB (GeForce RTX 4060) — the GeForce RTX 4060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GT 620 | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 8 GB+1500% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | 272 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 24 MB+9500% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.0 (GeForce GT 620) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4060). Vulkan: None vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.2 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GT 620 | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.0 | 12 Ultimate+9% |
| Vulkan | None | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.2 | 4.6+10% |
| Max Displays | 3 | 4+33% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No (GeForce GT 620) vs NVENC 8th gen (GeForce RTX 4060). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP5 vs NVDEC 5th gen. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GT 620) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060).
| Feature | GeForce GT 620 | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No | NVENC 8th gen |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP5 | NVDEC 5th gen |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GT 620 draws 65W versus the GeForce RTX 4060's 115W — a 55.6% difference. The GeForce GT 620 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 250W (GeForce GT 620) vs 550W (GeForce RTX 4060). Power connectors: None vs 8-pin. Card length: 145mm vs 240mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 73°C.
| Feature | GeForce GT 620 | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 65W-43% | 115W |
| Recommended PSU | 250W-55% | 550W |
| Power Connector | None | 8-pin |
| Length | 145mm | 240mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-4% | 73°C |
| Perf/Watt | 6.0 | 170.0+2733% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce GT 620 came in at $59, while the GeForce RTX 4060 launched at $299. On MSRP, GeForce GT 620 was 80.3% cheaper ($240 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 6.6 (GeForce GT 620) vs 65.4 (GeForce RTX 4060) — the GeForce RTX 4060 offers 890.9% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 4060 (2023 vs 2012).
| Feature | GeForce GT 620 | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $59-80% | $299 |
| Performance per Dollar | 6.6 | 65.4+891% |
| Codename | GK107 | AD107 |
| Release | June 5 2012 | May 18 2023 |
| Ranking | #837 | #84 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














