GeForce GT 625 vs GeForce 8800M GTS

CPU

GPU

GeForce GT 625

2010Core: 607 MHz

GeForce 8800M GTS

2008Core: 500 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

GeForce GT 625

200

375

0.0%

GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU

GeForce 8800M GTS

150

382

+1.9%

GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The GeForce GT 625 is positioned at rank #195 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 625

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

MSRP: $399|Avg: $280

1161%

GeForce RTX 5060

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

1115%

Radeon RX 5600 XT

MSRP: $279|Avg: $180

1102%

Radeon RX 9060

MSRP: $249|Avg: $249

1100%

GeForce RTX 5050

MSRP: $249|Avg: $249

1098%

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

MSRP: $249|Avg: $150

1092%

Arc A580

MSRP: $179|Avg: $179

1078%

Radeon RX 9060 XT

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

1074%

Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

1064%

#10

Radeon RX 7600

MSRP: $269|Avg: $250

1061%

#11

Radeon RX 6600

MSRP: $329|Avg: $180

1048%

#12

GeForce RTX 4060

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

1046%

#13

Arc B570

MSRP: $219|Avg: $219

1027%

#14

Arc B580

MSRP: $249|Avg: $249

1027%

#96

Radeon Ryzen 3 5300U

MSRP: $250|Avg: $250

99%

#180

Radeon R5 430 OEM

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $13

1280%

#195

GeForce GT 625

MSRP: $60|Avg: $15

100%

#196

Radeon HD 5600/5700

MSRP: $99|Avg: $99

99%

#197

GeForce GT 240

MSRP: $80|Avg: $80

99%

#199

GeForce GT 705

MSRP: $60|Avg: $15

99%

#200

Radeon HD 7340

MSRP: $25|Avg: $5

98%

#201

GeForce GT 320

MSRP: $79|Avg: $30

95%

#202

Radeon HD 5570

MSRP: $80|Avg: $80

95%

#203

Radeon R5 A6-8500P

MSRP: $100|Avg: $50

94%

#204

Radeon HD 7580D

MSRP: $60|Avg: $15

94%

#205

Radeon HD 7470

MSRP: $50|Avg: $15

92%

#206

Radeon R5 A240

MSRP: $100|Avg: $10

92%

#207

Radeon HD 6550D

MSRP: $70|Avg: $70

91%

#208

Radeon HD 4670

MSRP: $67|Avg: $67

91%

#209

Radeon R5 235X

MSRP: $49|Avg: $15

90%

#210

Radeon R7 A360

MSRP: $109|Avg: $55

90%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce 8800M GTS is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.9% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce GT 625 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

Insight	GeForce GT 625	GeForce 8800M GTS
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.9%)	✅Leading raw performance (+1.9%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / Fermi (2010−2014))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / G9x (2007−2010))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	✅ More VRAM (+100%)	❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly	—

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce 8800M GTS remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GT 625 Benchmark Check

GeForce 8800M GTS Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

No prediction data available

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

No prediction data available

Valorant

No prediction data available

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GT 625 and GeForce 8800M GTS

GeForce GT 625

The GeForce GT 625 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 31 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 607 MHz. It has 352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 375 points. Launch price was $279.

GeForce 8800M GTS

The GeForce 8800M GTS is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 15 2008. It features the G9x architecture. The core clock speed is 500 MHz. It has 224 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 65 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 382 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GT 625 scores 375 and the GeForce 8800M GTS reaches 382 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 625 is built on Fermi while the GeForce 8800M GTS uses G9x, both on 40 nm vs 65 nm. Shader units: 352 (GeForce GT 625) vs 224 (GeForce 8800M GTS).

Feature	GeForce GT 625	GeForce 8800M GTS
G3D Mark Score	375	382+2%
Architecture	Fermi	G9x
Process Node	40 nm	65 nm
Shading Units	352+57%	224

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce GT 625	GeForce 8800M GTS
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GT 625 comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce 8800M GTS has 512 MB. The GeForce GT 625 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit.

Feature	GeForce GT 625	GeForce 8800M GTS
VRAM Capacity	1 GB+100%	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GT 625) vs 10.0 (GeForce 8800M GTS). Vulkan: N/A vs None. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

Feature	GeForce GT 625	GeForce 8800M GTS
DirectX	12 (11_0)+20%	10.0
Vulkan	N/A	None
OpenGL	4.6+39%	3.3
Max Displays	2	2

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (GeForce GT 625) vs No (GeForce 8800M GTS). Decoder: PureVideo HD (VP5) vs PureVideo HD VP2. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GT 625) vs MPEG-2,H.264 (GeForce 8800M GTS).

Feature	GeForce GT 625	GeForce 8800M GTS
Encoder	None	No
Decoder	PureVideo HD (VP5)	PureVideo HD VP2
Codecs	H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1	MPEG-2,H.264

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 625 draws 200W versus the GeForce 8800M GTS's 150W — a 28.6% difference. The GeForce 8800M GTS is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 250W (GeForce GT 625) vs 350W (GeForce 8800M GTS). Power connectors: None vs Legacy. Card length: 168mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 70 vs 95°C.