GeForce GT 625 vs GeForce GT 130
GeForce GT 625
Popular choices:
GeForce GT 130
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce GT 625 is positioned at rank 195 and the GeForce GT 130 is on rank 267, so the GeForce GT 625 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 625
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 130
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce GT 130 is significantly newer (2017 vs 2010). The GeForce GT 130 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GT 625 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GT 130 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.6% higher G3D Mark score and 50% more VRAM (2 GB vs 1 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GT 625.
| Insight | GeForce GT 625 | GeForce GT 130 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.6%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.6%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / Fermi (2010−2014)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal (2016−2021)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+50%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GT 625 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GT 625 holds the technical lead. Priced at $15 (vs $20), it costs 25% less, resulting in a 31.2% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GT 625 | GeForce GT 130 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+31.2%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($15) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($20) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GT 625 and GeForce GT 130
GeForce GT 625
The GeForce GT 625 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 31 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 607 MHz. It has 352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 375 points. Launch price was $279.
GeForce GT 130
The GeForce GT 130 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 17 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1228 MHz to 1468 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 381 points. Launch price was $79.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GT 625 scores 375 and the GeForce GT 130 reaches 381 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 625 is built on Fermi while the GeForce GT 130 uses Pascal, both on 40 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 352 (GeForce GT 625) vs 384 (GeForce GT 130). Raw compute: 0.8554 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 625) vs 1.127 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 130).
| Feature | GeForce GT 625 | GeForce GT 130 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 375 | 381+2% |
| Architecture | Fermi | Pascal |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 352 | 384+9% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.8554 TFLOPS | 1.127 TFLOPS+32% |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 44+83% | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 704 KB+389% | 144 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GT 625 | GeForce GT 130 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GT 625 comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GT 130 has 2 GB. The GeForce GT 130 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GT 625 | GeForce GT 130 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB | 1.5 GB+50% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GT 625) vs 10.0 (GeForce GT 130). Vulkan: N/A vs None. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce GT 625 | GeForce GT 130 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0)+20% | 10.0 |
| Vulkan | N/A | None |
| OpenGL | 4.6+39% | 3.3 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (GeForce GT 625) vs No (GeForce GT 130). Decoder: PureVideo HD (VP5) vs PureVideo HD VP3. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GT 625) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (GeForce GT 130).
| Feature | GeForce GT 625 | GeForce GT 130 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | No |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD (VP5) | PureVideo HD VP3 |
| Codecs | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GT 625 draws 200W versus the GeForce GT 130's 30W — a 147.8% difference. The GeForce GT 130 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 250W (GeForce GT 625) vs 350W (GeForce GT 130). Power connectors: None vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 168mm vs 229mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 70 vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce GT 625 | GeForce GT 130 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W | 30W-85% |
| Recommended PSU | 250W-29% | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 168mm | 229mm |
| Height | 69mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 70-7% | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 1.9 | 12.7+568% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GT 625 launched at $60 MSRP and currently averages $15, while the GeForce GT 130 launched at $100 and now averages $20. The GeForce GT 625 costs 25% less ($5 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 25.0 (GeForce GT 625) vs 19.1 (GeForce GT 130) — the GeForce GT 625 offers 30.9% better value. The GeForce GT 130 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2010).
| Feature | GeForce GT 625 | GeForce GT 130 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $60-40% | $100 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $15-25% | $20 |
| Performance per Dollar | 25.0+31% | 19.1 |
| Codename | GF100 | GP108 |
| Release | May 31 2010 | May 17 2017 |
| Ranking | #618 | #641 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GT 625 and GeForce GT 130
