G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GT 625 vs GeForce RTX 4060 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GT 625 vs GeForce RTX 4060: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GT 625

2010

Why buy it

✅Costs $239 less on MSRP ($60 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
✅Measures 168mm instead of 240mm, a 72mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 1 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌2010 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 6.3 vs 65.4 G3D/$ ($60 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).

GeForce RTX 4060

2023

Why buy it

✅1843.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 946% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 65.4 vs 6.3 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $60 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 1 GB).
✅Better long-term bet: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌42.9% longer card at 240mm vs 168mm.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce RTX 4060 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 1843.1% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 5112.8% in PassMark G3D (19,548 vs 375), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 4060 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 8 GB vs 1 GB of VRAM, the newer feature stack, with DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023) and DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023), while GeForce GT 625 is limited to no meaningful modern upscaling stack and no comparable frame-generation support, a 5nm process instead of 40nm, and 24 vs 0 ray-tracing units. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce RTX 4060 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $239 more expensive on MSRP at $299 vs $60, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 946% (65.4 vs 6.3), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce GT 625 vs GeForce RTX 4060 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GT 625

The GeForce GT 625 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 31 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 607 MHz. It has 352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 375 points. Launch price was $279.

GeForce RTX 4060

The GeForce RTX 4060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1830 MHz to 2460 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,548 points. Launch price was $299.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GT 625 scores 375 versus the GeForce RTX 4060's 19,548 — the GeForce RTX 4060 leads by 5112.8%. The GeForce GT 625 is built on Fermi while the GeForce RTX 4060 uses Ada Lovelace, both on 40 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 352 (GeForce GT 625) vs 3,072 (GeForce RTX 4060). Raw compute: 0.8554 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 625) vs 15.11 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060).

Feature	GeForce GT 625	GeForce RTX 4060
G3D Mark Score	375	19,548+5113%
Architecture	Fermi	Ada Lovelace
Process Node	40 nm	5 nm
Shading Units	352	3072+773%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.8554 TFLOPS	15.11 TFLOPS+1666%
ROPs	32	48+50%
TMUs	44	96+118%
L1 Cache	0.69 MB	3 MB+335%
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	24 MB+4700%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The clearest feature edge for the GeForce RTX 4060 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The GeForce GT 625 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 supports the newer DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce GT 625 is capped at Upscaling support.

Feature	GeForce GT 625	GeForce RTX 4060
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution
Frame Generation	Not Supported	DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation
Ray Reconstruction	No	Yes (DLSS 3.5)
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GT 625 has 1 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4060 carries 8 GB. GeForce RTX 4060 gives you 700% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GT 625 and 128-bit on the GeForce RTX 4060. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GeForce GT 625) vs 24 MB (GeForce RTX 4060) — the GeForce RTX 4060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GT 625	GeForce RTX 4060
VRAM Capacity	1 GB	8 GB+700%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	272 GB/s
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	24 MB+4700%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GT 625) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4060). Vulkan: N/A vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce GT 625	GeForce RTX 4060
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 Ultimate
Vulkan	N/A	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	2	4+100%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (GeForce GT 625) vs NVENC 8th gen (GeForce RTX 4060). Decoder: PureVideo HD (VP5) vs NVDEC 5th gen. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GT 625) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060).

Feature	GeForce GT 625	GeForce RTX 4060
Encoder	None	NVENC 8th gen
Decoder	PureVideo HD (VP5)	NVDEC 5th gen
Codecs	H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1	H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 625 draws 200W versus the GeForce RTX 4060's 115W — a 54% difference. The GeForce RTX 4060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 250W (GeForce GT 625) vs 550W (GeForce RTX 4060). Power connectors: None vs 8-pin. Card length: 168mm vs 240mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70 vs 73°C.

Feature	GeForce GT 625	GeForce RTX 4060
TDP	200W	115W-43%
Recommended PSU	250W-55%	550W
Power Connector	None	8-pin
Length	168mm	240mm
Height	69mm	111mm
Slots	1-50%	2
Temp (Load)	70-4%	73°C
Perf/Watt	1.9	170.0+8847%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GT 625 came in at $60, while the GeForce RTX 4060 launched at $299. On MSRP, GeForce GT 625 was 79.9% cheaper ($239 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 6.3 (GeForce GT 625) vs 65.4 (GeForce RTX 4060) — the GeForce RTX 4060 offers 938.1% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 4060 (2023 vs 2010).

Feature	GeForce GT 625	GeForce RTX 4060
MSRP	$60-80%	$299
Performance per Dollar	6.3	65.4+938%
Codename	GF100	AD107
Release	May 31 2010	May 18 2023
Ranking	#618	#84

Search GeForce GT 625 on Amazon

Search GeForce RTX 4060 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.