GeForce GTS 240
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
GeForce GTS 240 vs GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GTS 240 vs GeForce RTX 3050 6GB FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GTS 240 vs GeForce RTX 3050 6GB: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GTS 240
2010Why buy it
- ✅Costs $89 less on MSRP ($80 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3050 6GB across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 1 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌2010 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 6.4 vs 63.6 G3D/$ ($80 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024Why buy it
- ✅1011.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 888% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 6.4 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $80 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 1 GB).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTS 240 vs GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
GeForce GTS 240
The GeForce GTS 240 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 13 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 783 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 106W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 515 points. Launch price was $129.
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTS 240 scores 515 versus the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB's 10,749 — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB leads by 1987.2%. The GeForce GTS 240 is built on Fermi while the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB uses Ampere, both on 40 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 192 (GeForce GTS 240) vs 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB). Raw compute: 0.6013 TFLOPS (GeForce GTS 240) vs 6.774 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB).
| Feature | GeForce GTS 240 | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 515 | 10,749+1987% |
| Architecture | Fermi | Ampere |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 192 | 2304+1100% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.6013 TFLOPS | 6.774 TFLOPS+1027% |
| ROPs | 16 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 32 | 72+125% |
| L1 Cache | 0.25 MB | 2.3 MB+820% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 2 MB+700% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB supports the newer DLSS 2 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce GTS 240 is capped at Upscaling support.
| Feature | GeForce GTS 240 | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | DLSS 2 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTS 240 has 1 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB carries 6 GB. GeForce RTX 3050 6GB gives you 500% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTS 240 and 96-bit on the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (GeForce GTS 240) vs 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTS 240 | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB | 6 GB+500% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | 168 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+33% | 96-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 2 MB+700% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.1 (10_0) (GeForce GTS 240) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB). OpenGL: 3.2 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTS 240 | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 Ultimate+8% |
| OpenGL | 3.2 | 4.6+44% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 4+100% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: PureVideo HD VP2 (GeForce GTS 240) vs NVENC (5th Gen) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP2 vs NVDEC (7th Gen). Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GTS 240) vs H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB).
| Feature | GeForce GTS 240 | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | PureVideo HD VP2 | NVENC (5th Gen) |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP2 | NVDEC (7th Gen) |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTS 240 draws 106W versus the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB's 70W — a 40.9% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTS 240) vs 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs None. Card length: 229mm vs 160mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTS 240 | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 106W | 70W-34% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 300W-14% |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | None |
| Length | 229mm | 160mm |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 75°C-12% |
| Perf/Watt | 4.9 | 153.6+3035% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce GTS 240 came in at $80, while the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB launched at $169. On MSRP, GeForce GTS 240 was 52.7% cheaper ($89 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 6.4 (GeForce GTS 240) vs 63.6 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 893.8% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 3050 6GB (2024 vs 2010).
| Feature | GeForce GTS 240 | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $80-53% | $169 |
| Performance per Dollar | 6.4 | 63.6+894% |
| Codename | GF106 | GA107 |
| Release | September 13 2010 | February 2 2024 |
| Ranking | #791 | #252 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GTS 240 and GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
