GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design vs Radeon R9 M295X

CPU

GPU

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design

2018Core: 1152 MHzBoost: 1417 MHz

Buy on Amazon

Radeon R9 M295X

2014Core: 723 MHz

Buy on Amazon

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design vs Radeon R9 M295X Performance Spectrum

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design

4 GB 75

5,310

+3.1%

RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU

Radeon R9 M295X

4 GB 250

5,150

0.0%

Radeon HD 6970

Radeon HD8970M

Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design vs Radeon R9 M295X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design vs Radeon R9 M295X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design

2018

Why buy it

✅Radeon R9 M295X is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design is the less risky modern option long term.
✅Draws 75W instead of 250W, a 175W reduction.
✅More future proof: Pascal (2016−2021) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R9 M295X across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2018 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 17.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $300 MSRP).

Radeon R9 M295X

2014

Why buy it

✅36.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 17.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌2014 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌233.3% higher power demand at 250W vs 75W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon R9 M295X is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 36.8% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design instead at 5,310 vs 5,150, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 14nm process instead of 28nm and a newer 2018 generation instead of 2014. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon R9 M295X makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R9 M295X is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design vs Radeon R9 M295X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design

The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1152 MHz to 1417 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,310 points.

Radeon R9 M295X

The Radeon R9 M295X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 23 2014. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 723 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,150 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design scores 5,310 and the Radeon R9 M295X reaches 5,150 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design is built on Pascal while the Radeon R9 M295X uses GCN 3.0, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 768 (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design) vs 2,048 (Radeon R9 M295X). Raw compute: 2.177 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design) vs 2.961 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M295X).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design	Radeon R9 M295X
G3D Mark Score	5,310+3%	5,150
Architecture	Pascal	GCN 3.0
Process Node	14 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	768	2048+167%
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.177 TFLOPS	2.961 TFLOPS+36%
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	48	128+167%
L1 Cache	288 KB	512 KB+78%
L2 Cache	1 MB+100%	0.5 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon R9 M295X leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design	Radeon R9 M295X
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 4 GB of GDDR5. Memory bandwidth: 112 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design) vs 176 GB/s (Radeon R9 M295X) — a 57.1% advantage for the Radeon R9 M295X. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design and 256-bit on the Radeon R9 M295X. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon R9 M295X) — the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design	Radeon R9 M295X
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	112 GB/s	176 GB/s+57%
Bus Width	128-bit	256-bit+100%
L2 Cache	1 MB+100%	0.5 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design) vs 12 (Radeon R9 M295X). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design	Radeon R9 M295X
DirectX	12 (12_1)	12
Max Displays	4	0

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (6th Gen) (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design) vs VCE 3.0 (Radeon R9 M295X). Decoder: NVDEC (3rd Gen) vs UVD 4.2.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design	Radeon R9 M295X
Encoder	NVENC (6th Gen)	VCE 3.0
Decoder	NVDEC (3rd Gen)	UVD 4.2
Codecs	H.264,H.265 (HEVC),VP9	—

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design draws 75W versus the Radeon R9 M295X's 250W — a 107.7% difference. The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M295X). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design	Radeon R9 M295X
TDP	75W-70%	250W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	Mobile
Length	—	1mm
Slots	0	0
Temp (Load)	70°C	—
Perf/Watt	70.8+244%	20.6

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design (2018 vs 2014).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design	Radeon R9 M295X
MSRP	—	$300
Codename	GP107	Amethyst
Release	January 3 2018	November 23 2014
Ranking	#429	#437

Search GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design on Amazon

Search Radeon R9 M295X on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.