GeForce GTX 1630 vs GeForce RTX 4070
GeForce GTX 1630
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 4070
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 1630
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 4070
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 4070 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 439.2% higher G3D Mark score and 200% more VRAM (12 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 1630.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 1630 | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-439.2%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+439.2%) |
| Longevity | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 5nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | 🎮 High Capacity (12 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | Standard Size (304mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 1630 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $90 versus $550 for the GeForce RTX 4070, it costs 84% less. While it maintains significantly lower raw performance, this results in a 13.3% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 1630 | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+13.3%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($90) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($550) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1630 and GeForce RTX 4070
GeForce GTX 1630
The GeForce GTX 1630 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 28 2022. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1740 MHz to 1785 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,992 points.
GeForce RTX 4070
The GeForce RTX 4070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1920 MHz to 2475 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,919 points. Launch price was $599.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1630 scores 4,992 versus the GeForce RTX 4070's 26,919 — the GeForce RTX 4070 leads by 439.2%. The GeForce GTX 1630 is built on Turing while the GeForce RTX 4070 uses Ada Lovelace, both on 12 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 512 (GeForce GTX 1630) vs 5,888 (GeForce RTX 4070). Raw compute: 1.828 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1630) vs 29.15 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070). Boost clocks: 1785 MHz vs 2475 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1630 | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,992 | 26,919+439% |
| Architecture | Turing | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 512 | 5888+1050% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.828 TFLOPS | 29.15 TFLOPS+1495% |
| Boost Clock | 1785 MHz | 2475 MHz+39% |
| ROPs | 16 | 64+300% |
| TMUs | 32 | 184+475% |
| L1 Cache | 0.5 MB | 5.8 MB+1060% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 36 MB+3500% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce GTX 1630 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1630 | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | DLSS 3.5 |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | DLSS 3.0 (Native) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1630 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4070 has 12 GB. The GeForce RTX 4070 offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 96 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1630) vs 504 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4070) — a 425% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070. Bus width: 64-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1630) vs 36 MB (GeForce RTX 4070) — the GeForce RTX 4070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1630 | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 12 GB+200% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6X |
| Memory Bandwidth | 96 GB/s | 504 GB/s+425% |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 192-bit+200% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 36 MB+3500% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce GTX 1630) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4070). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1630 | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 4+33% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 6th gen (GeForce GTX 1630) vs 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (GeForce RTX 4070). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1630) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4070).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1630 | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 6th gen | 8th Gen NVENC (2x) |
| Decoder | NVDEC 4th gen | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1630 draws 75W versus the GeForce RTX 4070's 200W — a 90.9% difference. The GeForce GTX 1630 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1630) vs 650W (GeForce RTX 4070). Power connectors: None vs 8-pin. Card length: 145mm vs 304mm, occupying 2 vs 3 slots. Typical load temperature: 60°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1630 | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-63% | 200W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-54% | 650W |
| Power Connector | None | 8-pin |
| Length | 145mm | 304mm |
| Height | 111mm | 137mm |
| Slots | 2-33% | 3 |
| Temp (Load) | 60°C-25% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 66.6 | 134.6+102% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1630 launched at $150 MSRP and currently averages $90, while the GeForce RTX 4070 launched at $599 and now averages $550. The GeForce GTX 1630 costs 83.6% less ($460 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 55.5 (GeForce GTX 1630) vs 48.9 (GeForce RTX 4070) — the GeForce GTX 1630 offers 13.5% better value. The GeForce RTX 4070 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2022).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1630 | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150-75% | $599 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $90-84% | $550 |
| Performance per Dollar | 55.5+13% | 48.9 |
| Codename | TU117 | AD104 |
| Release | June 28 2022 | April 12 2023 |
| Ranking | #444 | #32 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GTX 1630 and GeForce RTX 4070
