GeForce GTX 1630 vs GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
GeForce GTX 1630
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 1630
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 532.6% higher G3D Mark score and 200% more VRAM (12 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 1630.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 1630 | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-532.6%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+532.6%) |
| Longevity | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 4nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | 🎮 High Capacity (12 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | Standard Size (285mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 1630 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $90 versus $590 for the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti, it costs 85% less. While it maintains significantly lower raw performance, this results in a 3.6% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 1630 | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+3.6%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($90) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($590) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1630 and GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
GeForce GTX 1630
The GeForce GTX 1630 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 28 2022. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1740 MHz to 1785 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,992 points.
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2610 MHz. It has 7680 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 285W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 31,578 points. Launch price was $799.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1630 scores 4,992 versus the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti's 31,578 — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti leads by 532.6%. The GeForce GTX 1630 is built on Turing while the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti uses Ada Lovelace, both on 12 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 512 (GeForce GTX 1630) vs 7,680 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Raw compute: 1.828 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1630) vs 40.09 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Boost clocks: 1785 MHz vs 2610 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1630 | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,992 | 31,578+533% |
| Architecture | Turing | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 4 nm |
| Shading Units | 512 | 7680+1400% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.828 TFLOPS | 40.09 TFLOPS+2093% |
| Boost Clock | 1785 MHz | 2610 MHz+46% |
| ROPs | 16 | 80+400% |
| TMUs | 32 | 240+650% |
| L1 Cache | 0.5 MB | 7.5 MB+1400% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 48 MB+4700% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce GTX 1630 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1630 | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | DLSS 3.5 |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | DLSS 3.0 (Native) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1630 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti has 12 GB. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 96 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1630) vs 504 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) — a 425% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti. Bus width: 64-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1630) vs 48 MB (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1630 | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 12 GB+200% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6X |
| Memory Bandwidth | 96 GB/s | 504 GB/s+425% |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 192-bit+200% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 48 MB+4700% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce GTX 1630) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1630 | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 4+33% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 6th gen (GeForce GTX 1630) vs NVENC (8th Gen) (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs NVDEC (5th Gen). Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1630) vs AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1630 | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 6th gen | NVENC (8th Gen) |
| Decoder | NVDEC 4th gen | NVDEC (5th Gen) |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 | AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1630 draws 75W versus the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti's 285W — a 116.7% difference. The GeForce GTX 1630 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1630) vs 700W (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Power connectors: None vs 8-pin. Card length: 145mm vs 285mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 60°C vs 70°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1630 | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-74% | 285W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-57% | 700W |
| Power Connector | None | 8-pin |
| Length | 145mm | 285mm |
| Height | 111mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 60°C-14% | 70°C |
| Perf/Watt | 66.6 | 110.8+66% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1630 launched at $150 MSRP and currently averages $90, while the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti launched at $799 and now averages $590. The GeForce GTX 1630 costs 84.7% less ($500 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 55.5 (GeForce GTX 1630) vs 53.5 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) — the GeForce GTX 1630 offers 3.7% better value. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2022).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1630 | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150-81% | $799 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $90-85% | $590 |
| Performance per Dollar | 55.5+4% | 53.5 |
| Codename | TU117 | AD104 |
| Release | June 28 2022 | January 3 2023 |
| Ranking | #444 | #11 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GTX 1630 and GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
