GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile) vs FirePro W8100

Performance Spectrum - GPU

GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile)

50

6,968

+2.3%

RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile

GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU

GeForce RTX 5060 Ti

FirePro W8100

220

6,812

0.0%

Radeon 840M

Radeon RX 560 (móvel)

Radeon HD 7970 / R9 280X

Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS

Radeon RX 7600M

Radeon RX 6700S

Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10GB

Radeon RX 7800 XT

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile) is positioned at rank 50 and the FirePro W8100 is on rank 254, so the GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile) offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile)

#16

Radeon RX 7600S

MSRP: $269|Avg: $250

100%

#40

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

187%

#42

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

169%

#43

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

169%

#47

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

154%

#48

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

153%

#50

GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $75

100%

#53

GeForce GTX 980M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $80

97%

#54

GeForce GTX 770M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $40

96%

#57

GeForce 770M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $40

93%

#62

Radeon 820M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $25

92%

#65

GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

91%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar FirePro W8100

#106

L40S

MSRP: $7500|Avg: $7500

98%

#107

Quadro P6000

MSRP: $5999|Avg: $1500

95%

#238

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

5411%

#253

L2

MSRP: $2000|Avg: $1500

100%

#254

FirePro W8100

MSRP: $2499|Avg: $200

100%

#255

Quadro K5200

MSRP: $2250|Avg: $70

100%

#257

Quadro K2000D

MSRP: $599|Avg: $35

98%

#258

FirePro V7800

MSRP: $759|Avg: $96

98%

#259

FirePro W8000

MSRP: $1599|Avg: $1599

97%

#260

Quadro K2000

MSRP: $599|Avg: $500

97%

#261

GRID P4-8Q

MSRP: $2000|Avg: $200

97%

#263

FirePro 3D V5800

MSRP: $479|Avg: $30

94%

#264

GRID M40

MSRP: $1000|Avg: $100

92%

#265

GRID P40-8Q

MSRP: $3000|Avg: $150

92%

#266

GRID M3-3020

MSRP: $1000|Avg: $50

92%

#267

FirePro V3800

MSRP: $129|Avg: $12

91%

#268

FirePro V5800

MSRP: $479|Avg: $15

90%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile) is significantly newer (2020 vs 2014). The GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile) likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The FirePro W8100 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile) is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.3% higher G3D Mark score. However, the FirePro W8100 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

Insight	GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile)	FirePro W8100
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+2.3%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.3%)
Longevity	Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 2.0 (2013−2017))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+100%)
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	—	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile) offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $75 versus $200 for the FirePro W8100, it costs 63% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 172.8% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile)	FirePro W8100
Cost Efficiency	✅Better overall value (+172.8%)	❌Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	✅More affordable ($75)	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($200)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile) Benchmark Check

FirePro W8100 Benchmark Check

Loading...

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile) and FirePro W8100

GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile)

The GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2020. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1350 MHz to 1485 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,968 points.

FirePro W8100

The FirePro W8100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 23 2014. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 824 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,812 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile) scores 6,968 and the FirePro W8100 reaches 6,812 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile) is built on Turing while the FirePro W8100 uses GCN 2.0, both on 12 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile)) vs 2,560 (FirePro W8100). Raw compute: 3.041 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile)) vs 4.219 TFLOPS (FirePro W8100).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile)	FirePro W8100
G3D Mark Score	6,968+2%	6,812
Architecture	Turing	GCN 2.0
Process Node	12 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	1024	2560+150%
Compute (TFLOPS)	3.041 TFLOPS	4.219 TFLOPS+39%
ROPs	32	64+100%
TMUs	64	160+150%
L1 Cache	1 MB+59%	0.63 MB
L2 Cache	1 MB	1 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile)	FirePro W8100
Upscaling Tech	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	FSR 3 (Compatible)	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile) comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the FirePro W8100 has 8 GB. The FirePro W8100 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile)	FirePro W8100
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	8 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Bus Width	128-bit	256-bit+100%
L2 Cache	1 MB	1 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile)) vs 12 (FirePro W8100). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 6.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile)	FirePro W8100
DirectX	12 (12_1)	12
Vulkan	1.3+8%	1.2
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	3	6+100%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 6th Gen (Volta/Turing) (GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile)) vs VCE 2.0 (FirePro W8100). Decoder: NVDEC 4th Gen vs UVD 4.2. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile)) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 Part 2,MVC (FirePro W8100).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile)	FirePro W8100
Encoder	NVENC 6th Gen (Volta/Turing)	VCE 2.0
Decoder	NVDEC 4th Gen	UVD 4.2
Codecs	H.264,H.265,VP9	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 Part 2,MVC

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile) draws 50W versus the FirePro W8100's 220W — a 125.9% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile)) vs 350W (FirePro W8100). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 241mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 87 vs 87°C.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile)	FirePro W8100
TDP	50W-77%	220W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	0mm	241mm
Height	0mm	111mm
Slots	0-100%	2
Temp (Load)	87	87°C
Perf/Watt	139.4+350%	31.0

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile) costs 62.5% less ($125 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 92.9 (GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile)) vs 34.1 (FirePro W8100) — the GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile) offers 172.4% better value. The GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile) is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2014).