Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile) vs GRID P40-24Q

CPUCPUGPUGPU
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile)

2020Core: 1350 MHzBoost: 1485 MHz
GTX family
····
Buy on Amazon
VS

GRID P40-24Q

2015Core: 557 MHzBoost: 1178 MHz
Buy on Amazon

GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile) vs GRID P40-24Q Performance Spectrum

GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile)
4 GB 50
6,968
0.0%
brand logoGeForce GTX 750 Ti
brand logoGeForce GTX 580
brand logoGeForce GTX 670
brand logoGeForce GTX 960
brand logoGeForce GTX 980
brand logoRTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
brand logoGeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
brand logoGeForce RTX 5060 Ti
GRID P40-24Q
4 GB 225
7,057
+1.3%
brand logoGeForce GTX 570
brand logoGeForce GTX 580
brand logoGeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2
brand logoGeForce MX570 A
brand logoGeForce GTX 980
brand logoGeForce RTX 2080 (Mobile)
brand logoGeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
brand logoGeForce RTX 5060 Ti

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile) vs GRID P40-24Q: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile)

2020

Why buy it

  • ✅GRID P40-24Q is already legacy-tier future-proofing, so GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile) is the less risky modern option long term.
  • ✅Draws 50W instead of 225W, a 175W reduction.
  • ✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
  • ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 1.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $5,699 MSRP).

GRID P40-24Q

2015

Why buy it

  • ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($5,699 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • ❌2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
  • ❌350% higher power demand at 225W vs 50W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GRID P40-24Q is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1.3% in PassMark G3D (7,057 vs 6,968), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile) is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 12nm process instead of 28nm and a newer 2020 generation instead of 2015. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GRID P40-24Q makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GRID P40-24Q is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile) has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile) vs GRID P40-24Q Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile)

The GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2020. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1350 MHz to 1485 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,968 points.

NVIDIA

GRID P40-24Q

The GRID P40-24Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,057 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile) scores 6,968 and the GRID P40-24Q reaches 7,057 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile) is built on Turing while the GRID P40-24Q uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 12 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile)) vs 2,048 (GRID P40-24Q). Raw compute: 3.041 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile)) vs 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID P40-24Q). Boost clocks: 1485 MHz vs 1178 MHz.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile)GRID P40-24Q
G3D Mark Score
6,968
7,057+1%
Architecture
Turing
Maxwell 2.0
Process Node
12 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
1024
2048+100%
Compute (TFLOPS)
3.041 TFLOPS
4.825 TFLOPS+59%
Boost Clock
1485 MHz+26%
1178 MHz
ROPs
32
64+100%
TMUs
64
128+100%
L1 Cache
1 MB+33%
0.75 MB
L2 Cache
1 MB
2 MB+100%
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile) gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The GRID P40-24Q leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile)GRID P40-24Q
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 4 GB of video memory. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile) and 128-bit on the GRID P40-24Q. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile)) vs 2 MB (GRID P40-24Q) — the GRID P40-24Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile)GRID P40-24Q
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR6
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
1 MB
2 MB+100%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile)) vs 12.0 (GRID P40-24Q). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 0.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile)GRID P40-24Q
DirectX
12 (12_1)
12.0
Vulkan
1.3+18%
1.1
OpenGL
4.6+2%
4.5
Max Displays
3
0
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 6th Gen (Volta/Turing) (GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile)) vs NVENC 4.0 (GRID P40-24Q). Decoder: NVDEC 4th Gen vs PureVideo HD VP7. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile)) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (GRID P40-24Q).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile)GRID P40-24Q
Encoder
NVENC 6th Gen (Volta/Turing)
NVENC 4.0
Decoder
NVDEC 4th Gen
PureVideo HD VP7
Codecs
H.264,H.265,VP9
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile) draws 50W versus the GRID P40-24Q's 225W — a 127.3% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile)) vs 350W (GRID P40-24Q). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 267mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile)GRID P40-24Q
TDP
50W-78%
225W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
267mm
Height
0mm
111mm
Slots
0-100%
2
Temp (Load)
87
—
Perf/Watt
139.4+344%
31.4
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile) (2020 vs 2015).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile)GRID P40-24Q
MSRP
—
$5699
Codename
TU116
GM204
Release
April 23 2020
August 30 2015
Ranking
#324
#433
Search GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile) on AmazonSearch GRID P40-24Q on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.