GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile) vs Radeon RX 470 (móvel)

CPU

GPU

GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile)

2020Core: 1350 MHzBoost: 1485 MHz

GTX family

····

Buy on Amazon

Radeon RX 470 (móvel)

2016Core: 926 MHzBoost: 1074 MHz

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile) vs Radeon RX 470 (móvel) Performance Spectrum

GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile)

4 GB 50

6,968

0.0%

RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile

GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU

GeForce RTX 5060 Ti

Radeon RX 470 (móvel)

4 GB 85

7,000

+0.5%

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile) vs Radeon RX 470 (móvel) FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile) vs Radeon RX 470 (móvel): Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile)

2020

Why buy it

✅1.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Radeon RX 470 (móvel) is already legacy-tier future-proofing, so GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile) is the less risky modern option long term.
✅Draws 50W instead of 85W, a 35W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 39.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $179 MSRP).

Radeon RX 470 (móvel)

2016

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 39.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($179 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile) across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2016 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
❌70% higher power demand at 85W vs 50W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile) is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 1.8% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon RX 470 (móvel) instead at 7,000 vs 6,968, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile) is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 12nm process instead of 14nm and a newer 2020 generation instead of 2016. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon RX 470 (móvel) makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon RX 470 (móvel) is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile) has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile) vs Radeon RX 470 (móvel) Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile)

The GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2020. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1350 MHz to 1485 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,968 points.

Radeon RX 470 (móvel)

The Radeon RX 470 (móvel) is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 4 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 926 MHz to 1074 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 85W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,000 points. Launch price was $549.99.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile) scores 6,968 and the Radeon RX 470 (móvel) reaches 7,000 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile) is built on Turing while the Radeon RX 470 (móvel) uses GCN 4.0, both on 12 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile)) vs 2,048 (Radeon RX 470 (móvel)). Raw compute: 3.041 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile)) vs 4.399 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 470 (móvel)). Boost clocks: 1485 MHz vs 1074 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile)	Radeon RX 470 (móvel)
G3D Mark Score	6,968	7,000
Architecture	Turing	GCN 4.0
Process Node	12 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	1024	2048+100%
Compute (TFLOPS)	3.041 TFLOPS	4.399 TFLOPS+45%
Boost Clock	1485 MHz+38%	1074 MHz
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	64	128+100%
L1 Cache	1 MB+100%	0.5 MB
L2 Cache	1 MB	2 MB+100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile) gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon RX 470 (móvel) leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile)	Radeon RX 470 (móvel)
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 4 GB of GDDR5. Memory bandwidth: 128 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile)) vs 224 GB/s (Radeon RX 470 (móvel)) — a 75% advantage for the Radeon RX 470 (móvel). Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile) and 256-bit on the Radeon RX 470 (móvel). L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile)) vs 2 MB (Radeon RX 470 (móvel)) — the Radeon RX 470 (móvel) has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile)	Radeon RX 470 (móvel)
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	128 GB/s	224 GB/s+75%
Bus Width	128-bit	256-bit+100%
L2 Cache	1 MB	2 MB+100%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile)) vs 12 (Radeon RX 470 (móvel)). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 0.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile)	Radeon RX 470 (móvel)
DirectX	12 (12_1)	12
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	3	0

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 6th Gen (Volta/Turing) (GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile)) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon RX 470 (móvel)). Decoder: NVDEC 4th Gen vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile)) vs H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX 470 (móvel)).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile)	Radeon RX 470 (móvel)
Encoder	NVENC 6th Gen (Volta/Turing)	VCE 3.4
Decoder	NVDEC 4th Gen	UVD 6.3
Codecs	H.264,H.265,VP9	H.264,HEVC,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile) draws 50W versus the Radeon RX 470 (móvel)'s 85W — a 51.9% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile)) vs 350W (Radeon RX 470 (móvel)). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 1mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 87 vs 80°C.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile)	Radeon RX 470 (móvel)
TDP	50W-41%	85W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	0mm	1mm
Height	0mm	—
Slots	0	0
Temp (Load)	87	80°C-8%
Perf/Watt	139.4+69%	82.4

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile) (2020 vs 2016).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile)	Radeon RX 470 (móvel)
MSRP	—	$179
Codename	TU116	Ellesmere
Release	April 23 2020	August 4 2016
Ranking	#324	#360

Search GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile) on Amazon

Search Radeon RX 470 (móvel) on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.