G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs GeForce RTX 3070 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs GeForce RTX 3070: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 1650 Ti

2012

Why buy it

✅Costs $349 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
✅Delivers 12.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.2 vs 44.4 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
✅Draws 50W instead of 220W, a 170W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3070 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
❌2012 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.

GeForce RTX 3070

2020

Why buy it

✅474.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
✅Better long-term bet: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌
232.7% HIGHER MSRP
$499 MSRPvs$150 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 44.4 vs 50.2 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
❌340% higher power demand at 220W vs 50W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce RTX 3070 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 474.7% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 194.6% in PassMark G3D (22,172 vs 7,525), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 3070 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 8 GB vs 4 GB of VRAM, the newer upscaling stack, DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 8nm process instead of 28nm, and 46 vs 0 ray-tracing units. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GTX 1650 Ti makes the most sense to buy today. It is $349 cheaper on MSRP at $150 vs $499, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 12.9% (50.2 vs 44.4), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and strong 1440p headroom, GeForce RTX 3070 has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs GeForce RTX 3070 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 1650 Ti

The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 9 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 928 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,525 points. Launch price was $149.

GeForce RTX 3070

The GeForce RTX 3070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1725 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,172 points. Launch price was $499.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 Ti scores 7,525 versus the GeForce RTX 3070's 22,172 — the GeForce RTX 3070 leads by 194.6%. The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is built on Kepler while the GeForce RTX 3070 uses Ampere, both on 28 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 768 (GeForce GTX 1650 Ti) vs 5,888 (GeForce RTX 3070). Raw compute: 1.425 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650 Ti) vs 20.31 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3070).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650 Ti	GeForce RTX 3070
G3D Mark Score	7,525	22,172+195%
Architecture	Kepler	Ampere
Process Node	28 nm	8 nm
Shading Units	768	5888+667%
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.425 TFLOPS	20.31 TFLOPS+1325%
ROPs	16	96+500%
TMUs	64	184+188%
L1 Cache	0.06 MB	5.8 MB+9567%
L2 Cache	0.25 MB	4 MB+1500%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce RTX 3070 supports the newer DLSS 2 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is capped at Upscaling support.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650 Ti	GeForce RTX 3070
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	DLSS 2 Super Resolution
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti has 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3070 carries 8 GB. GeForce RTX 3070 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 192 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1650 Ti) vs 448 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3070) — a 133.3% advantage for the GeForce RTX 3070. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 1650 Ti and 256-bit on the GeForce RTX 3070. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (GeForce GTX 1650 Ti) vs 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3070) — the GeForce RTX 3070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650 Ti	GeForce RTX 3070
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	8 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth	192 GB/s	448 GB/s+133%
Bus Width	128-bit	256-bit+100%
L2 Cache	0.25 MB	4 MB+1500%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (GeForce GTX 1650 Ti) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3070). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650 Ti	GeForce RTX 3070
DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 Ultimate
Vulkan	1.3	1.4+8%
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	3	4+33%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 6 (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650 Ti) vs NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3070). Decoder: NVDEC 4 vs NVDEC 5th gen. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (GeForce GTX 1650 Ti) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3070).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650 Ti	GeForce RTX 3070
Encoder	NVENC 6 (Volta)	NVENC 7th gen
Decoder	NVDEC 4	NVDEC 5th gen
Codecs	H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1	H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti draws 50W versus the GeForce RTX 3070's 220W — a 125.9% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 0W (GeForce GTX 1650 Ti) vs 650W (GeForce RTX 3070). Power connectors: None vs 8-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 242mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 75°C.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650 Ti	GeForce RTX 3070
TDP	50W-77%	220W
Recommended PSU	0W-100%	650W
Power Connector	None	8-pin
Length	0mm	242mm
Height	0mm	112mm
Slots	0-100%	2
Temp (Load)	75	75°C
Perf/Watt	150.5+49%	100.8

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 1650 Ti came in at $150, while the GeForce RTX 3070 launched at $499. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 1650 Ti was 69.9% cheaper ($349 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 50.2 (GeForce GTX 1650 Ti) vs 44.4 (GeForce RTX 3070) — the GeForce GTX 1650 Ti offers 13.1% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 3070 (2020 vs 2012).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650 Ti	GeForce RTX 3070
MSRP	$150-70%	$499
Performance per Dollar	50.2+13%	44.4
Codename	GK106	GA104
Release	October 9 2012	September 1 2020
Ranking	#633	#63

Search GeForce GTX 1650 Ti on Amazon

Search GeForce RTX 3070 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.