
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs GeForce RTX 4070 Ti FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs GeForce RTX 4070 Ti: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
2012Why buy it
- ✅Costs $649 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 26.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.2 vs 39.5 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 285W, a 235W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌2012 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
2023Why buy it
- ✅578.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 4nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌432.7% HIGHER MSRP$799 MSRPvs$150 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 39.5 vs 50.2 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
- ❌470% higher power demand at 285W vs 50W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 9 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 928 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,525 points. Launch price was $149.

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2610 MHz. It has 7680 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 285W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 31,578 points. Launch price was $799.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 Ti scores 7,525 versus the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti's 31,578 — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti leads by 319.6%. The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is built on Kepler while the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti uses Ada Lovelace, both on 28 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 768 (GeForce GTX 1650 Ti) vs 7,680 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Raw compute: 1.425 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650 Ti) vs 40.09 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 Ti | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,525 | 31,578+320% |
| Architecture | Kepler | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 4 nm |
| Shading Units | 768 | 7680+900% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.425 TFLOPS | 40.09 TFLOPS+2713% |
| ROPs | 16 | 80+400% |
| TMUs | 64 | 240+275% |
| L1 Cache | 0.06 MB | 7.5 MB+12400% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 48 MB+19100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The clearest feature edge for the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti supports the newer DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is capped at Upscaling support.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 Ti | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti has 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti carries 12 GB. GeForce RTX 4070 Ti gives you 200% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 192 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1650 Ti) vs 504 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) — a 162.5% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 1650 Ti and 192-bit on the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (GeForce GTX 1650 Ti) vs 48 MB (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 Ti | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 12 GB+200% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6X |
| Memory Bandwidth | 192 GB/s | 504 GB/s+163% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 192-bit+50% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 48 MB+19100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (GeForce GTX 1650 Ti) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 Ti | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 4+33% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 6 (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650 Ti) vs NVENC (8th Gen) (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Decoder: NVDEC 4 vs NVDEC (5th Gen). Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (GeForce GTX 1650 Ti) vs AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 Ti | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 6 (Volta) | NVENC (8th Gen) |
| Decoder | NVDEC 4 | NVDEC (5th Gen) |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 | AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti draws 50W versus the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti's 285W — a 140.3% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 0W (GeForce GTX 1650 Ti) vs 700W (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Power connectors: None vs 8-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 285mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 70°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 Ti | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-82% | 285W |
| Recommended PSU | 0W-100% | 700W |
| Power Connector | None | 8-pin |
| Length | 0mm | 285mm |
| Height | 0mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75 | 70°C-7% |
| Perf/Watt | 150.5+36% | 110.8 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce GTX 1650 Ti came in at $150, while the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti launched at $799. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 1650 Ti was 81.2% cheaper ($649 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 50.2 (GeForce GTX 1650 Ti) vs 39.5 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) — the GeForce GTX 1650 Ti offers 27.1% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 4070 Ti (2023 vs 2012).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 Ti | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150-81% | $799 |
| Performance per Dollar | 50.2+27% | 39.5 |
| Codename | GK106 | AD104 |
| Release | October 9 2012 | January 3 2023 |
| Ranking | #633 | #11 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














