
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
2019Why buy it
- ✅Measures 229mm instead of 235mm, a 6mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌12% HIGHER MSRP$279 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $30 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $279 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
2019GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
2022Why buy it
- ✅Measures 229mm instead of 235mm, a 6mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $30 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $279 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌12% HIGHER MSRP$279 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce GTX 1660 Ti better than GeForce RTX 3050 OEM?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does GeForce RTX 3050 OEM make more sense than GeForce GTX 1660 Ti?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 98 FPS | 130 FPS |
| medium | 88 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 76 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 63 FPS | 83 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 90 FPS | 119 FPS |
| medium | 77 FPS | 96 FPS |
| high | 66 FPS | 81 FPS |
| ultra | 54 FPS | 69 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 45 FPS | 64 FPS |
| medium | 41 FPS | 57 FPS |
| high | 30 FPS | 39 FPS |
| ultra | 26 FPS | 33 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 269 FPS | 239 FPS |
| medium | 227 FPS | 206 FPS |
| high | 170 FPS | 164 FPS |
| ultra | 136 FPS | 128 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 183 FPS | 163 FPS |
| medium | 156 FPS | 135 FPS |
| high | 124 FPS | 112 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 92 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 106 FPS | 88 FPS |
| medium | 89 FPS | 74 FPS |
| high | 72 FPS | 62 FPS |
| ultra | 56 FPS | 49 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 574 FPS | 535 FPS |
| medium | 459 FPS | 428 FPS |
| high | 382 FPS | 357 FPS |
| ultra | 287 FPS | 268 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 430 FPS | 401 FPS |
| medium | 344 FPS | 321 FPS |
| high | 287 FPS | 268 FPS |
| ultra | 215 FPS | 201 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 287 FPS | 268 FPS |
| medium | 229 FPS | 214 FPS |
| high | 191 FPS | 178 FPS |
| ultra | 143 FPS | 134 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 401 FPS | 467 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 414 FPS |
| high | 263 FPS | 335 FPS |
| ultra | 221 FPS | 268 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 330 FPS | 372 FPS |
| medium | 268 FPS | 321 FPS |
| high | 206 FPS | 236 FPS |
| ultra | 164 FPS | 197 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 158 FPS | 199 FPS |
| medium | 119 FPS | 175 FPS |
| high | 107 FPS | 150 FPS |
| ultra | 85 FPS | 125 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1660 Ti and GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 22 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1770 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,747 points. Launch price was $279.

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1515 MHz to 1755 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,892 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti scores 12,747 versus the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM's 11,892 — the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti leads by 7.2%. The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is built on Turing while the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM uses Ampere, both on 12 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti) vs 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Raw compute: 5.437 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti) vs 8.986 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Boost clocks: 1770 MHz vs 1755 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 12,747+7% | 11,892 |
| Architecture | Turing | Ampere |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 1536 | 2560+67% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.437 TFLOPS | 8.986 TFLOPS+65% |
| Boost Clock | 1770 MHz | 1755 MHz |
| ROPs | 48+50% | 32 |
| TMUs | 96+20% | 80 |
| L1 Cache | 1.5 MB | 2.5 MB+67% |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 2 MB+33% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM supports the newer DLSS 2 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is capped at Upscaling support.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | DLSS 2 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 288 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti) vs 224 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) — a 28.6% advantage for the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti. Bus width: 192-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti) vs 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 8 GB+33% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 288 GB/s+29% | 224 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+50% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 2 MB+33% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th gen (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti) vs 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th gen | 8th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | NVDEC 4th gen | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti draws 120W versus the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM's 130W — a 8% difference. The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti) vs 450W (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 229mm vs 235mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 120W-8% | 130W |
| Recommended PSU | 450W | 450W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 229mm | 235mm |
| Height | 111mm | 124mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 106.2+16% | 91.5 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti launched at $279 MSRP, while the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM launched at $249. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM costs 10.8% less ($30 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 45.7 (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti) vs 47.8 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM offers 4.6% better value. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2019).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $279 | $249-11% |
| Performance per Dollar | 45.7 | 47.8+5% |
| Codename | TU116 | GA106 |
| Release | February 22 2019 | January 4 2022 |
| Ranking | #204 | #224 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












