CPU
GPU
GeForce GTX 275
Popular choices:
FirePro M40003
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce GTX 275 is positioned at rank 217 and the FirePro M40003 is on rank 151, so the FirePro M40003 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 275
Performance Per Dollar FirePro M40003
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The FirePro M40003 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.1% higher G3D Mark score and 357.1% more VRAM (4 GB vs 896 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 275.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 275 | FirePro M40003 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.1%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2009 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+357.1%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The FirePro M40003 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the FirePro M40003 holds the technical lead. Priced at $72 (vs $249), it costs 71% less, resulting in a 249.7% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 275 | FirePro M40003 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+249.7%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($249) | ✅More affordable ($72) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 275 and FirePro M40003
GeForce GTX 275
The GeForce GTX 275 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 15 2009. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 633 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 219W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,349 points. Launch price was $249.
FirePro M40003
The FirePro M40003 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 27 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 675 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,364 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 275 scores 1,349 and the FirePro M40003 reaches 1,364 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 275 is built on Tesla 2.0 while the FirePro M40003 uses GCN 1.0, both on 55 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 240 (GeForce GTX 275) vs 512 (FirePro M40003). Raw compute: 0.6739 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 275) vs 0.6912 TFLOPS (FirePro M40003).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 275 | FirePro M40003 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,349 | 1,364+1% |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 55 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 240 | 512+113% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.6739 TFLOPS | 0.6912 TFLOPS+3% |
| ROPs | 28+75% | 16 |
| TMUs | 80+150% | 32 |
| L2 Cache | 224 KB | 256 KB+14% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 275 | FirePro M40003 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 275 comes with 896 MB of VRAM, while the FirePro M40003 has 4 GB. The FirePro M40003 offers 357.1% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 224 KB (GeForce GTX 275) vs 256 KB (FirePro M40003) — the FirePro M40003 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 275 | FirePro M40003 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.875 GB | 4 GB+357% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 224 KB | 256 KB+14% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11 (10_0) (GeForce GTX 275) vs 12 (FirePro M40003). OpenGL: 3.3 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 6.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 275 | FirePro M40003 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11 (10_0) | 12+9% |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6+39% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 6+200% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No (GeForce GTX 275) vs VCE 1.0 (FirePro M40003). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP2 vs UVD 4.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264 (GeForce GTX 275) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 (FirePro M40003).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 275 | FirePro M40003 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No | VCE 1.0 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP2 | UVD 4.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 275 draws 219W versus the FirePro M40003's 33W — a 147.6% difference. The FirePro M40003 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce GTX 275) vs 350W (FirePro M40003). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 82mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 275 | FirePro M40003 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 219W | 33W-85% |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 350W-36% |
| Power Connector | 2x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 82mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 75°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 6.2 | 41.3+566% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 275 launched at $249 MSRP and currently averages $249, while the FirePro M40003 launched at $150 and now averages $72. The FirePro M40003 costs 71.1% less ($177 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 5.4 (GeForce GTX 275) vs 18.9 (FirePro M40003) — the FirePro M40003 offers 250% better value. The FirePro M40003 is the newer GPU (2012 vs 2009).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 275 | FirePro M40003 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249 | $150-40% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $249 | $72-71% |
| Performance per Dollar | 5.4 | 18.9+250% |
| Codename | GT200B | Chelsea |
| Release | January 15 2009 | June 27 2012 |
| Ranking | #789 | #752 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GTX 275 and FirePro M40003
