CPU
GPU
GeForce GTX 275
Popular choices:
GeForce GT 750M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce GTX 275 is positioned at rank 217 and the GeForce GT 750M is on rank 158, so the GeForce GT 750M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 275
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 750M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 275 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.3% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce GT 750M offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 275 | GeForce GT 750M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.3%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2009 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+128.6%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GT 750M offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GT 750M holds the technical lead. Priced at $50 (vs $249), it costs 80% less, resulting in a 391.7% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 275 | GeForce GT 750M |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+391.7%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($249) | ✅More affordable ($50) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 275 and GeForce GT 750M
GeForce GTX 275
The GeForce GTX 275 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 15 2009. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 633 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 219W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,349 points. Launch price was $249.
GeForce GT 750M
The GeForce GT 750M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 9 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 941 MHz to 967 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,332 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 275 scores 1,349 and the GeForce GT 750M reaches 1,332 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 275 is built on Tesla 2.0 while the GeForce GT 750M uses Kepler, both on 55 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 240 (GeForce GTX 275) vs 384 (GeForce GT 750M). Raw compute: 0.6739 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 275) vs 0.7427 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 750M).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 275 | GeForce GT 750M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,349+1% | 1,332 |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Kepler |
| Process Node | 55 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 240 | 384+60% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.6739 TFLOPS | 0.7427 TFLOPS+10% |
| ROPs | 28+75% | 16 |
| TMUs | 80+150% | 32 |
| L2 Cache | 224 KB | 256 KB+14% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 275 | GeForce GT 750M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 275 comes with 896 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GT 750M has 2 GB. The GeForce GT 750M offers 128.6% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 224 KB (GeForce GTX 275) vs 256 KB (GeForce GT 750M) — the GeForce GT 750M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 275 | GeForce GT 750M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.875 GB | 2 GB+129% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 224 KB | 256 KB+14% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11 (10_0) (GeForce GTX 275) vs 12 (FL11) (GeForce GT 750M). OpenGL: 3.3 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 275 | GeForce GT 750M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11 (10_0) | 12 (FL11)+9% |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6+39% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 4+100% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No (GeForce GTX 275) vs NVENC 1st gen (GeForce GT 750M). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP2 vs NVDEC 1st gen. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264 (GeForce GTX 275) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GT 750M).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 275 | GeForce GT 750M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No | NVENC 1st gen |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP2 | NVDEC 1st gen |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 275 draws 219W versus the GeForce GT 750M's 50W — a 125.7% difference. The GeForce GT 750M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce GTX 275) vs 350W (GeForce GT 750M). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 275 | GeForce GT 750M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 219W | 50W-77% |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 350W-36% |
| Power Connector | 2x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 6.2 | 26.6+329% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GT 750M costs 79.9% less ($199 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 5.4 (GeForce GTX 275) vs 26.6 (GeForce GT 750M) — the GeForce GT 750M offers 392.6% better value. The GeForce GT 750M is the newer GPU (2013 vs 2009).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 275 | GeForce GT 750M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $249 | $50-80% |
| Performance per Dollar | 5.4 | 26.6+393% |
| Codename | GT200B | GK107 |
| Release | January 15 2009 | January 9 2013 |
| Ranking | #789 | #792 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GTX 275 and GeForce GT 750M
