CPU
GPU
GeForce GTX 275
Popular choices:
FireStream 9270
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce GTX 275 is positioned at rank 217 and the FireStream 9270 is on rank 359, so the GeForce GTX 275 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 275
Performance Per Dollar FireStream 9270
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 275 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.6% higher G3D Mark score. However, the FireStream 9270 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 275 | FireStream 9270 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.6%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.6%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2009 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / TeraScale (2005−2013)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+128.6%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The FireStream 9270 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the FireStream 9270 holds the technical lead. Priced at $20 (vs $249), it costs 92% less, resulting in a 1137.6% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 275 | FireStream 9270 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+1137.6%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($249) | ✅More affordable ($20) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 275 and FireStream 9270
GeForce GTX 275
The GeForce GTX 275 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 15 2009. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 633 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 219W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,349 points. Launch price was $249.
FireStream 9270
The FireStream 9270 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 13 2008. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 750 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,341 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 275 scores 1,349 and the FireStream 9270 reaches 1,341 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 275 is built on Tesla 2.0 while the FireStream 9270 uses TeraScale, both on a 55 nm process. Shader units: 240 (GeForce GTX 275) vs 800 (FireStream 9270). Raw compute: 0.6739 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 275) vs 1.2 TFLOPS (FireStream 9270).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 275 | FireStream 9270 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,349 | 1,341 |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | TeraScale |
| Process Node | 55 nm | 55 nm |
| Shading Units | 240 | 800+233% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.6739 TFLOPS | 1.2 TFLOPS+78% |
| ROPs | 28+75% | 16 |
| TMUs | 80+100% | 40 |
| L2 Cache | 224 KB | 256 KB+14% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 275 | FireStream 9270 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 275 comes with 896 MB of VRAM, while the FireStream 9270 has 2 GB. The FireStream 9270 offers 128.6% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 224 KB (GeForce GTX 275) vs 256 KB (FireStream 9270) — the FireStream 9270 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 275 | FireStream 9270 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.875 GB | 2 GB+129% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 224 KB | 256 KB+14% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11 (10_0) (GeForce GTX 275) vs 10.1 (FireStream 9270). OpenGL: 3.3 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 1.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 275 | FireStream 9270 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11 (10_0)+9% | 10.1 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
| Max Displays | 2+100% | 1 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No (GeForce GTX 275) vs None (FireStream 9270). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP2 vs UVD 2.2. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264 (GeForce GTX 275) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (FireStream 9270).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 275 | FireStream 9270 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No | None |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP2 | UVD 2.2 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 275 draws 219W versus the FireStream 9270's 160W — a 31.1% difference. The FireStream 9270 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce GTX 275) vs 350W (FireStream 9270). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 241mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 275 | FireStream 9270 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 219W | 160W-27% |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 350W-36% |
| Power Connector | 2x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 241mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C-6% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 6.2 | 8.4+35% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 275 launched at $249 MSRP and currently averages $249, while the FireStream 9270 launched at $1499 and now averages $20. The FireStream 9270 costs 92% less ($229 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 5.4 (GeForce GTX 275) vs 67.0 (FireStream 9270) — the FireStream 9270 offers 1140.7% better value. The GeForce GTX 275 is the newer GPU (2009 vs 2008).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 275 | FireStream 9270 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249-83% | $1499 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $249 | $20-92% |
| Performance per Dollar | 5.4 | 67.0+1141% |
| Codename | GT200B | RV770 |
| Release | January 15 2009 | November 13 2008 |
| Ranking | #789 | #790 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GTX 275 and FireStream 9270
